lastID = -296746
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:37:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 13:37:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:36:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 02:00:57 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:00:56 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint

Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint

Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint
Abstract
Traditional top-down methods of determining the carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant does not provide the detailed feedback needed by operations and design to minimize carbon footprint at the facility. A detailed bottom-up approach based upon whole plant modeling has been developed that gives the detail needed by designers and operators. This bottom up approach is based upon the ASMN model where two step nitrification and four step denitrification is used for secondary treatment. This model releases N2O as a part of the denitrification system. Autotrophic N2O production is not considered.This modeling study of nitrogen removal and its impacts upon whole plant carbon footprint clearly show the importance of biogenic N2O production in the secondary treatment system. This production accounted for between 35% and almost 65% of the total plant footprint.In this model, N2O release is primarily by stripping in the aerobic zone by the fine bubble aeration system. As a result the lowest N2O production levels were seen in systems that minimized the amount of N2O entering that first aerobic zone. The last anoxic zone nitrate/nitrite level was used as a surrogate for N2O levels since it is more easily measured. Essentially if there are significant nitrate/nitrite levels in the last anoxic zone, the denitrification intermediate, N2O, is also likely to be present at higher levels.If the designer's, or operator's, goal is to minimize their plant's carbon footprint, the goal should be to minimize the concentration of nitrate leaving the plant's anoxic zones. While the plant influent COD/N ratio is not under the control of either party the design and operation of the nitrogen removal system can be adjusted for the desired goals.On a whole plant basis, the production of N2O in the bioreactor system is the single largest variable on the plant carbon footprint, with it accounting for between 25% and 65% of the total. This paper has shown that this carbon impact can be minimized during design and operation ofthe facility.
Traditional top-down methods of determining the carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant does not provide the detailed feedback needed by operations and design to minimize carbon footprint at the facility. A detailed bottom-up approach based upon whole plant modeling has been developed that gives the detail needed by designers and operators. This bottom up approach is based upon the ASMN...
Author(s)
Bruce R. JohnsonWilliam C. Hiatt
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7 - Carbon Footprinting & Sustainable Design
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:4L.556;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793901347
Volume / Issue2009 / 4
Content sourceNutrient Removal and Recovery Symposium
First / last page(s)556 - 564
Copyright2009
Word count340
Subject keywordsASMNGreenhouse GasN2ONitrous OxideDenitrificationmodeling

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-296746
Get access
-296746
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint
Abstract
Traditional top-down methods of determining the carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant does not provide the detailed feedback needed by operations and design to minimize carbon footprint at the facility. A detailed bottom-up approach based upon whole plant modeling has been developed that gives the detail needed by designers and operators. This bottom up approach is based upon the ASMN model where two step nitrification and four step denitrification is used for secondary treatment. This model releases N2O as a part of the denitrification system. Autotrophic N2O production is not considered.This modeling study of nitrogen removal and its impacts upon whole plant carbon footprint clearly show the importance of biogenic N2O production in the secondary treatment system. This production accounted for between 35% and almost 65% of the total plant footprint.In this model, N2O release is primarily by stripping in the aerobic zone by the fine bubble aeration system. As a result the lowest N2O production levels were seen in systems that minimized the amount of N2O entering that first aerobic zone. The last anoxic zone nitrate/nitrite level was used as a surrogate for N2O levels since it is more easily measured. Essentially if there are significant nitrate/nitrite levels in the last anoxic zone, the denitrification intermediate, N2O, is also likely to be present at higher levels.If the designer's, or operator's, goal is to minimize their plant's carbon footprint, the goal should be to minimize the concentration of nitrate leaving the plant's anoxic zones. While the plant influent COD/N ratio is not under the control of either party the design and operation of the nitrogen removal system can be adjusted for the desired goals.On a whole plant basis, the production of N2O in the bioreactor system is the single largest variable on the plant carbon footprint, with it accounting for between 25% and 65% of the total. This paper has shown that this carbon impact can be minimized during design and operation ofthe facility.
Traditional top-down methods of determining the carbon footprint of a wastewater treatment plant does not provide the detailed feedback needed by operations and design to minimize carbon footprint at the facility. A detailed bottom-up approach based upon whole plant modeling has been developed that gives the detail needed by designers and operators. This bottom up approach is based upon the ASMN...
Author(s)
Bruce R. JohnsonWilliam C. Hiatt
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7 - Carbon Footprinting & Sustainable Design
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2009
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:4L.556;1-
DOI10.2175/193864709793901347
Volume / Issue2009 / 4
Content sourceNutrient Removal and Recovery Symposium
First / last page(s)556 - 564
Copyright2009
Word count340
Subject keywordsASMNGreenhouse GasN2ONitrous OxideDenitrificationmodeling

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Bruce R. Johnson# William C. Hiatt. Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 10 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-296746CITANCHOR>.
Bruce R. Johnson# William C. Hiatt. Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 10, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296746CITANCHOR.
Bruce R. Johnson# William C. Hiatt
Nitrogen Removal System Impacts on Secondary Treatment Greenhouse Gas Production and Whole Plant Carbon Footprint
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 10, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-296746CITANCHOR