lastID = -297341
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:34:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 00:41:33 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:41:32 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:41:31 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition

Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition

Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition
Abstract
The acceptance and processing of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) wastes from truck haulers at municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are of increasing interest because of the need to keep these materials out of wastewater collection systems, as well as the added energy recovery potential when FOG wastes are anaerobically digested or incinerated. The addition of FOG wastes to a WWTP usually requires the commingling of FOG waste and sludges or biosolids, and usually in a process that utilizes the energy from FOG such as anaerobic digestion or incineration. The manner in which this is done can impact the performance of the anaerobic digesters or thermal oxidation unit, as well as other solids handling processes, and so must be done properly.The objective of this paper is to present a body of experience for accepting and co-processing FOG wastes with sludges. The presentation will focus on the selection of FOG waste receiving and process flow alternatives to minimize the problems that have been associated negatively with introduction of FOG wastes into a treatment plant. These problems have included: blockage of pipes and pumps; digester foaming; grit accumulation in digesters; “stuck” digesters (curtailed methanogenesis); clogging of gas collection and handling systems; flashback and air emission exceedances in multiple hearth incineration systems; and excessive downtime for maintenance.The authors have been involved in the evaluation and development of FOG waste acceptance and transfer systems for sewage sludge incinerators at Greater New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority, CT and Hampton Roads Sanitation District, VA, and for anaerobic digestion systems at Gwinnett County, GA, Johnson County, KS, Pinellas County, FL and elsewhere. These projects have contributed to the collective knowledge base that is to be presented in this paper. Most of the referenced projects have been completed and performance experience will be summarized as well as lessons learned.Site surveys were used to gather information on multiple facilities, including those mentioned above as well as at Redwood City, Millbrae and Oakland, CA, Gresham, OR and Gothenburg, Sweden. Each facility visited was surveyed with respect to: facility size; FOG quantities received; off-loading; transfer to storage; storage; mixing; heating; digester feeding; load tracking; wash down; and odor control. The survey results were analyzed to develop a basis of design for several projects as well as to prepare this paper.
The acceptance and processing of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) wastes from truck haulers at municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are of increasing interest because of the need to keep these materials out of wastewater collection systems, as well as the added energy recovery potential when FOG wastes are anaerobically digested or incinerated. The addition of FOG wastes to a WWTP usually...
Author(s)
Tim SheaThomas D. JohnsonDale GabelBob Forbes
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 44: Enhanced Bioenergy Production
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:14L.2688;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798170513
Volume / Issue2010 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)2688 - 2700
Copyright2010
Word count388
Subject keywordsFOG wasteFOG handlingsolids handlingdigester gascogenerationenergy recoverythermal oxidationsustainability

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-297341
Get access
-297341
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition
Abstract
The acceptance and processing of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) wastes from truck haulers at municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are of increasing interest because of the need to keep these materials out of wastewater collection systems, as well as the added energy recovery potential when FOG wastes are anaerobically digested or incinerated. The addition of FOG wastes to a WWTP usually requires the commingling of FOG waste and sludges or biosolids, and usually in a process that utilizes the energy from FOG such as anaerobic digestion or incineration. The manner in which this is done can impact the performance of the anaerobic digesters or thermal oxidation unit, as well as other solids handling processes, and so must be done properly.The objective of this paper is to present a body of experience for accepting and co-processing FOG wastes with sludges. The presentation will focus on the selection of FOG waste receiving and process flow alternatives to minimize the problems that have been associated negatively with introduction of FOG wastes into a treatment plant. These problems have included: blockage of pipes and pumps; digester foaming; grit accumulation in digesters; “stuck” digesters (curtailed methanogenesis); clogging of gas collection and handling systems; flashback and air emission exceedances in multiple hearth incineration systems; and excessive downtime for maintenance.The authors have been involved in the evaluation and development of FOG waste acceptance and transfer systems for sewage sludge incinerators at Greater New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority, CT and Hampton Roads Sanitation District, VA, and for anaerobic digestion systems at Gwinnett County, GA, Johnson County, KS, Pinellas County, FL and elsewhere. These projects have contributed to the collective knowledge base that is to be presented in this paper. Most of the referenced projects have been completed and performance experience will be summarized as well as lessons learned.Site surveys were used to gather information on multiple facilities, including those mentioned above as well as at Redwood City, Millbrae and Oakland, CA, Gresham, OR and Gothenburg, Sweden. Each facility visited was surveyed with respect to: facility size; FOG quantities received; off-loading; transfer to storage; storage; mixing; heating; digester feeding; load tracking; wash down; and odor control. The survey results were analyzed to develop a basis of design for several projects as well as to prepare this paper.
The acceptance and processing of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) wastes from truck haulers at municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are of increasing interest because of the need to keep these materials out of wastewater collection systems, as well as the added energy recovery potential when FOG wastes are anaerobically digested or incinerated. The addition of FOG wastes to a WWTP usually...
Author(s)
Tim SheaThomas D. JohnsonDale GabelBob Forbes
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 44: Enhanced Bioenergy Production
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:14L.2688;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710798170513
Volume / Issue2010 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)2688 - 2700
Copyright2010
Word count388
Subject keywordsFOG wasteFOG handlingsolids handlingdigester gascogenerationenergy recoverythermal oxidationsustainability

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Tim Shea# Thomas D. Johnson# Dale Gabel# Bob Forbes. Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-297341CITANCHOR>.
Tim Shea# Thomas D. Johnson# Dale Gabel# Bob Forbes. Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297341CITANCHOR.
Tim Shea# Thomas D. Johnson# Dale Gabel# Bob Forbes
Introducing Fog to Sludge – A Sticky Proposition
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297341CITANCHOR