lastID = -297784
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:25:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 20:25:14 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:01:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:45 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:44 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:11:43 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers

Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers

Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers
Abstract
Traditional activated carbon odor control equipment for the waste water industry uses deep bed configurations with 36 inches of media. Non-traditional activated carbon odor scrubbers use cassettes holding “V”-shaped media beds with total bed depth ranging from 3 to 12 inches. The Cassette Systems have a wider velocity range that provides opportunity to reduce the system pressure drop, save energy, and reduce the total life cycle cost relative to traditional Deep Bed Adsorbers.The life cycle costs will differ based on the initial capital costs, cost of media replacement, cost of labor for media replacement, number of media replacements per year, media disposal, and energy consumption of the system. A life cycle valuation was performed for an airflow of 5,500 cubic feet per minute and a hydrogen sulfide design concentration of 5.5 parts per million by volume. The Cassette System using a high capacity carbon achieved a lower life cycle cost over a 10 year period than the Deep Bed Adsorber odor control unit using standard KOH impregnated carbon.
Traditional activated carbon odor control equipment for the waste water industry uses deep bed configurations with 36 inches of media. Non-traditional activated carbon odor scrubbers use cassettes holding “V”-shaped media beds with total bed depth ranging from 3 to 12 inches. The Cassette Systems have a wider velocity range that provides opportunity to reduce the system pressure drop,...
Author(s)
W. BradM. Stanley
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectArticles
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:3L.615;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710802767911
Volume / Issue2010 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)615 - 622
Copyright2010
Word count181
Subject keywordsOdor ControlEnergy ConsumptionLife Cycle CostDeep Bed AdsorberCassette

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-297784
Get access
-297784
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers
Abstract
Traditional activated carbon odor control equipment for the waste water industry uses deep bed configurations with 36 inches of media. Non-traditional activated carbon odor scrubbers use cassettes holding “V”-shaped media beds with total bed depth ranging from 3 to 12 inches. The Cassette Systems have a wider velocity range that provides opportunity to reduce the system pressure drop, save energy, and reduce the total life cycle cost relative to traditional Deep Bed Adsorbers.The life cycle costs will differ based on the initial capital costs, cost of media replacement, cost of labor for media replacement, number of media replacements per year, media disposal, and energy consumption of the system. A life cycle valuation was performed for an airflow of 5,500 cubic feet per minute and a hydrogen sulfide design concentration of 5.5 parts per million by volume. The Cassette System using a high capacity carbon achieved a lower life cycle cost over a 10 year period than the Deep Bed Adsorber odor control unit using standard KOH impregnated carbon.
Traditional activated carbon odor control equipment for the waste water industry uses deep bed configurations with 36 inches of media. Non-traditional activated carbon odor scrubbers use cassettes holding “V”-shaped media beds with total bed depth ranging from 3 to 12 inches. The Cassette Systems have a wider velocity range that provides opportunity to reduce the system pressure drop,...
Author(s)
W. BradM. Stanley
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectArticles
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2010
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20100101)2010:3L.615;1-
DOI10.2175/193864710802767911
Volume / Issue2010 / 3
Content sourceOdors and Air Pollutants Conference
First / last page(s)615 - 622
Copyright2010
Word count181
Subject keywordsOdor ControlEnergy ConsumptionLife Cycle CostDeep Bed AdsorberCassette

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
W. Brad# M. Stanley. Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 27 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-297784CITANCHOR>.
W. Brad# M. Stanley. Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed August 27, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297784CITANCHOR.
W. Brad# M. Stanley
Comparison of Cassette Odor Control Scrubbers and Traditional Deep Bed Odor Control Scrubbers
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
August 27, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-297784CITANCHOR