lastID = -298481
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 21:25:12 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:25:11 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants

Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants

Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants
Abstract
Indirect potable reuse plants, such as those located in Southern California, Singapore, and Australia, often use reverse osmosis (RO) membranes as part of the treatment process for removal of many constituents, including trace organics, nutrients, and dissolved solids, including divalent ions and large fractions of monovalent ions. Rejection of some of these ions, including bicarbonate (HCO3−) and calcium (Ca2+), creates RO permeate with low pH and insufficient calcium that must be stabilized before distribution to avoid corrosion of downstream infrastructure. Chemicals, such as lime, are typically used for water stabilization; however, lime often increases finished water turbidity due to impurities, which can lead to numerous issues associated with solids deposition, including difficulty complying with water quality requirements established by the end user. This paper will compare and contrast stabilization approaches utilized at two full-scale indirect potable reuse (IPR) plants.
Indirect potable reuse plants, such as those located in Southern California, Singapore, and Australia, often use reverse osmosis (RO) membranes as part of the treatment process for removal of many constituents, including trace organics, nutrients, and dissolved solids, including divalent ions and large fractions of monovalent ions. Rejection of some of these ions, including bicarbonate...
Author(s)
U. G. ErdalL. SchimmollerJ. LozierP. Fu
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 48: Advances in Treatment Technologies for Potable Reuse
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:14L.3005;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802720920
Volume / Issue2011 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3005 - 3018
Copyright2011
Word count151
Subject keywordsWater stabilizationlime saturatorliquid chemicalsMFIturbidityadvanced treatment

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-298481
Get access
-298481
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants
Abstract
Indirect potable reuse plants, such as those located in Southern California, Singapore, and Australia, often use reverse osmosis (RO) membranes as part of the treatment process for removal of many constituents, including trace organics, nutrients, and dissolved solids, including divalent ions and large fractions of monovalent ions. Rejection of some of these ions, including bicarbonate (HCO3−) and calcium (Ca2+), creates RO permeate with low pH and insufficient calcium that must be stabilized before distribution to avoid corrosion of downstream infrastructure. Chemicals, such as lime, are typically used for water stabilization; however, lime often increases finished water turbidity due to impurities, which can lead to numerous issues associated with solids deposition, including difficulty complying with water quality requirements established by the end user. This paper will compare and contrast stabilization approaches utilized at two full-scale indirect potable reuse (IPR) plants.
Indirect potable reuse plants, such as those located in Southern California, Singapore, and Australia, often use reverse osmosis (RO) membranes as part of the treatment process for removal of many constituents, including trace organics, nutrients, and dissolved solids, including divalent ions and large fractions of monovalent ions. Rejection of some of these ions, including bicarbonate...
Author(s)
U. G. ErdalL. SchimmollerJ. LozierP. Fu
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 48: Advances in Treatment Technologies for Potable Reuse
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2011
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20110101)2011:14L.3005;1-
DOI10.2175/193864711802720920
Volume / Issue2011 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3005 - 3018
Copyright2011
Word count151
Subject keywordsWater stabilizationlime saturatorliquid chemicalsMFIturbidityadvanced treatment

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
U. G. Erdal# L. Schimmoller# J. Lozier# P. Fu. Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-298481CITANCHOR>.
U. G. Erdal# L. Schimmoller# J. Lozier# P. Fu. Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298481CITANCHOR.
U. G. Erdal# L. Schimmoller# J. Lozier# P. Fu
Contrasting Finished Water Stabilization Approaches at Two Full-Scale Indirect Potable Reuse Plants
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-298481CITANCHOR