lastID = -10028473
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater...
Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:01:13 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:09:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:09:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-10-16 09:18:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 12:05:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:29:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 10:29:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:32:25 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-24 07:32:24 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:31:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 16:31:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 14:57:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-09-23 14:57:16 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater...
Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"

Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"

Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater...
Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"
Abstract
The City of Bend, Oregon, and Carollo Engineers, Inc. worked together to select a new dewatering technology to replace the City’s aging, poorly performing belt filter press. While the selection process included economic and non-economic analyses, the project team also assessed solids dewaterability through testing by third-party experts and incorporated criteria specific to the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) to identify the most suitable technology for the plant. The WRF’s digested solids are extremely difficult to dewater so dewaterability testing was used to determine the underlying reasons for poor dewaterability and the realistically achievable performance from different technologies. Belt filter presses, screw presses, centrifuges, and drying beds were considered, and centrifuges were ultimately selected as the most appropriate technology for the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). In-person site visits and telephone surveys of operating facilities allowed staff to hear about different equipment directly from other operators and maintenance personnel, which proved essential in building consensus around technology selection. Performance criteria and ultimate design features were based on the plant’s specific O&M needs and the results of the third-party dewaterability testing and on-site pilot tests.
The City of Bend, Oregon, and Carollo Engineers, Inc. worked together to select a new dewatering technology to replace the City’s aging, poorly performing belt filter press. While the selection process included economic and non-economic analyses, the project team also assessed solids dewaterability through testing by third-party experts and incorporated criteria specific to the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) to identify the most suitable technology for the plant. The WRF’s digested solids are extremely difficult to dewater so dewaterability testing was used to determine the underlying reasons for poor dewaterability and the realistically achievable performance from different technologies. Belt filter presses, screw presses, centrifuges, and drying beds were considered, and centrifuges were ultimately selected as the most appropriate technology for the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). In-person site visits and telephone surveys of operating facilities allowed staff to hear about different equipment directly from other operators and maintenance personnel, which proved essential in building consensus around technology selection. Performance criteria and ultimate design features were based on the plant’s specific O&M needs and the results of the third-party dewaterability testing and on-site pilot tests.
SpeakerGupta, Rashi
Presentation time
10:30:00
10:50:00
Session time
10:30:00
11:30:00
SessionOvercoming Dewatering Difficulties
Session number520
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance
Author(s)
R. GuptaR. Gupta
Author(s)R. Gupta1; R. Gupta1;
Author affiliation(s)Carollo Engineers, CA1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157542
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count13

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater...
Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10028473
Get access
-10028473
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater...
Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"
Abstract
The City of Bend, Oregon, and Carollo Engineers, Inc. worked together to select a new dewatering technology to replace the City’s aging, poorly performing belt filter press. While the selection process included economic and non-economic analyses, the project team also assessed solids dewaterability through testing by third-party experts and incorporated criteria specific to the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) to identify the most suitable technology for the plant. The WRF’s digested solids are extremely difficult to dewater so dewaterability testing was used to determine the underlying reasons for poor dewaterability and the realistically achievable performance from different technologies. Belt filter presses, screw presses, centrifuges, and drying beds were considered, and centrifuges were ultimately selected as the most appropriate technology for the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). In-person site visits and telephone surveys of operating facilities allowed staff to hear about different equipment directly from other operators and maintenance personnel, which proved essential in building consensus around technology selection. Performance criteria and ultimate design features were based on the plant’s specific O&M needs and the results of the third-party dewaterability testing and on-site pilot tests.
The City of Bend, Oregon, and Carollo Engineers, Inc. worked together to select a new dewatering technology to replace the City’s aging, poorly performing belt filter press. While the selection process included economic and non-economic analyses, the project team also assessed solids dewaterability through testing by third-party experts and incorporated criteria specific to the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) to identify the most suitable technology for the plant. The WRF’s digested solids are extremely difficult to dewater so dewaterability testing was used to determine the underlying reasons for poor dewaterability and the realistically achievable performance from different technologies. Belt filter presses, screw presses, centrifuges, and drying beds were considered, and centrifuges were ultimately selected as the most appropriate technology for the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF). In-person site visits and telephone surveys of operating facilities allowed staff to hear about different equipment directly from other operators and maintenance personnel, which proved essential in building consensus around technology selection. Performance criteria and ultimate design features were based on the plant’s specific O&M needs and the results of the third-party dewaterability testing and on-site pilot tests.
SpeakerGupta, Rashi
Presentation time
10:30:00
10:50:00
Session time
10:30:00
11:30:00
SessionOvercoming Dewatering Difficulties
Session number520
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance
TopicBiosolids and Residuals, Facility Operations and Maintenance
Author(s)
R. GuptaR. Gupta
Author(s)R. Gupta1; R. Gupta1;
Author affiliation(s)Carollo Engineers, CA1
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2020
DOI10.2175/193864718825157542
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2020
Word count13

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
R. Gupta# R. Gupta#. Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World". Water Environment Federation, 2020. Web. 16 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10028473CITANCHOR>.
R. Gupta# R. Gupta#. Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World". Water Environment Federation, 2020. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028473CITANCHOR.
R. Gupta# R. Gupta#
Dewatering Technology Selection for the "2nd Most Difficult-to-Dewater Sludge in the World"
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 7, 2020
June 16, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10028473CITANCHOR