lastID = -10077822
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an...
Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 07:57:47 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 20:08:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-18 10:35:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-18 10:35:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-18 09:40:41 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-14 11:00:21 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2021-09-14 12:28:29 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an...
Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset

Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset

Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an...
Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset
Abstract
This study investigated the process upset of a benchtop low rate anaerobic reactor by quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC) using typical wastewater quality analysis used by AD process operators and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. NMR is a fully quantifying and non-targeting method to detect changes in wastewater quality. The anaerobic reactor was seeded using anaerobic sludge from a potato processer and operated with a blanched potato wastewater mixture to provide nutrients and substrate. The system was operated for eight weeks to achieve steady state. During steady state, NMR was used to analyze the reactor effluent to generate steady state spectra of effluent quality for comparison during upset conditions. Once steady state was achieved, one dose of Benzolakonium chloride (BAC, a common QAC used in industrial sanitary processes) was added at 15 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in the reactor and the impact of the single dose on reactor performance was assessed. The study found that the reactor performance measured using COD removal efficiency, effluent volatile acid to partial alkalinity (VA/PA) ratio, effluent oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and methane gas yield indicated a process upset. NMR spectra identified an increase in volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in the effluent as a result of BAC addition. The results indicate that process upset conditions were caused by the single dose of QAC to the reactor at 15 mg/L and the upset conditions persisted for seven hydraulic retention times (HRTs) after the QAC was added.
This paper summarizes an experiment that investigated the effects of 15 mg/L benzalkonium chloride on a benchtop anaerobic digester using typical wastewater analytical methods (i.e., COD removal efficiency, methane generation yield, pH, etc.) as well as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The analytical methods were compared to understand advantages using NMR to analyze reactor performance and additional analytical results gained by NMR to diagnose anaerobic digestion process upsets.
SpeakerButson, Nick
Presentation time
11:20:00
11:30:00
Session time
11:00:00
12:00:00
SessionFinding Better Ways to Digest
Session number205
TopicBiosolids and Residuals
TopicBiosolids and Residuals
Author(s)
Nick Butson
Author(s)N. Butson1; J. Goodfellow2;
Author affiliation(s)Geosyntec Consultants, Waterloo, ON, CA1Geosyntec Consultants, Guelph, ON, CA2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2021
DOI10.2175/193864718825158036
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2021
Word count15

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an...
Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10077822
Get access
-10077822
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an...
Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset
Abstract
This study investigated the process upset of a benchtop low rate anaerobic reactor by quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC) using typical wastewater quality analysis used by AD process operators and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. NMR is a fully quantifying and non-targeting method to detect changes in wastewater quality. The anaerobic reactor was seeded using anaerobic sludge from a potato processer and operated with a blanched potato wastewater mixture to provide nutrients and substrate. The system was operated for eight weeks to achieve steady state. During steady state, NMR was used to analyze the reactor effluent to generate steady state spectra of effluent quality for comparison during upset conditions. Once steady state was achieved, one dose of Benzolakonium chloride (BAC, a common QAC used in industrial sanitary processes) was added at 15 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in the reactor and the impact of the single dose on reactor performance was assessed. The study found that the reactor performance measured using COD removal efficiency, effluent volatile acid to partial alkalinity (VA/PA) ratio, effluent oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and methane gas yield indicated a process upset. NMR spectra identified an increase in volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in the effluent as a result of BAC addition. The results indicate that process upset conditions were caused by the single dose of QAC to the reactor at 15 mg/L and the upset conditions persisted for seven hydraulic retention times (HRTs) after the QAC was added.
This paper summarizes an experiment that investigated the effects of 15 mg/L benzalkonium chloride on a benchtop anaerobic digester using typical wastewater analytical methods (i.e., COD removal efficiency, methane generation yield, pH, etc.) as well as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The analytical methods were compared to understand advantages using NMR to analyze reactor performance and additional analytical results gained by NMR to diagnose anaerobic digestion process upsets.
SpeakerButson, Nick
Presentation time
11:20:00
11:30:00
Session time
11:00:00
12:00:00
SessionFinding Better Ways to Digest
Session number205
TopicBiosolids and Residuals
TopicBiosolids and Residuals
Author(s)
Nick Butson
Author(s)N. Butson1; J. Goodfellow2;
Author affiliation(s)Geosyntec Consultants, Waterloo, ON, CA1Geosyntec Consultants, Guelph, ON, CA2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2021
DOI10.2175/193864718825158036
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2021
Word count15

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Nick Butson. Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset. Water Environment Federation, 2021. Web. 17 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10077822CITANCHOR>.
Nick Butson. Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset. Water Environment Federation, 2021. Accessed July 17, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10077822CITANCHOR.
Nick Butson
Comparison of NMR Analysis and Traditional Wastewater Analysis to Evaluate an Anaerobic Bioreactor Upset
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 19, 2021
July 17, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10077822CITANCHOR