This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: A Virtual Full-scale Ozonation Plant for Micropollutant Removal: How to Reduce...
A Virtual Full-scale Ozonation Plant for Micropollutant Removal: How to Reduce (eliminate?) Piloting Efforts
Abstract
The AMOZONE kinetic ozonation model was applied for assessing the suitability of ozonation for the removal of micropollutants (MPs) from the effluent of a full-scale Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF). The model was calibrated on the real water matrix. Different control strategies for MP removal (considering the complete list of 11 guide MPs of the current Dutch legislation and an extended set of 19 MPs) and BrO3 formation were tested. Results unravelled the complex dynamics behind O3 and HO* reactions in this specific water matrix. The virtual full-scale experiments revealed the potential MP removal, the extent of production of BrO3 (average levels varied between 1 and 3 μg/L), and the influence of the upstream WRRF dynamics. OpEx and CapEx of the virtual ful-scale installation were also assessed (the total cost varied between 9.2 and 10.7 cEUR/m³). No onsite piloting or MP analyses were needed and innovative controls could be tested.
The AMOZONE kinetic ozonation model was applied for assessing the suitability of ozonation for the removal of micropollutants (MPs) from the effluent of a full-scale Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF). The model was calibrated on the real water matrix. Different control strategies for MP removal (considering the complete list of 11 guide MPs of the current Dutch legislation and an extended set of 19 MPs) and BrO3 formation were tested. Results unravelled the complex dynamics behind O3 and HO* reactions in this specific water matrix. The virtual full-scale experiments revealed the potential MP removal, the extent of production of BrO3 (average levels varied between 1 and 3 μg/L), and the influence of the upstream WRRF dynamics. OpEx and CapEx of the virtual ful-scale installation were also assessed (the total cost varied between 9.2 and 10.7 cEUR/m³). No onsite piloting or MP analyses were needed and innovative controls could be tested.
SpeakerBellandi, Giacomo
Presentation time
16:00:00
16:20:00
Session time
16:00:00
17:30:00
SessionKeeping the Taste of Your Own Medicine Out of Water
Session number318
TopicMicroconstituents
TopicMicroconstituents
Author(s)
Giacomo Bellandi
Author(s)G. Bellandi1; M. Daza1; R. Muoio1; U. Rehman1; P. van Dijk2; R. Schemen2; T. Weijtmans2; W. Audenaert1;
Author affiliation(s)AM-TEAM, Advanced Modeling for Process Optimisation, Gent, BE1Waterboard De Dommel, Boxtel, DU2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2021
DOI10.2175/193864718825158070
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2021
Word count15

Purchase price $11.50

Get access