lastID = -10077925
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for...
In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2023-08-16 08:10:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-18 10:36:22 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-18 10:36:21 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-18 09:41:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-10-14 11:07:49 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2021-09-14 12:30:25 Adam Phillips
  • 2021-09-14 12:30:24 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for...
In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance

In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance

In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for...
In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance
Abstract
As effluent nutrient limits get more stringent, water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) will continue to need to implement biological nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal. BPR systems in particular are susceptible to upset and many plants struggle to maintain BPR year-round because of a multitude of factors including, insufficient bioavailable carbon for PAOs, suboptimal aeration control, solids recycle impacts, excessive solids retention times, suboptimal pH operation, and secondary phosphorus release. Recently, it has been suggested that current BPR designs are inadequate for stable performance and that sidestream RAS fermentation is needed for stable BPR (Barnard et al., 2017). The authors propose that RAS fermentation selects for unique BPR organisms (e.g., Tetrasphaera) that can perform anoxic P uptake and also ferment in the presence of deeply anaerobic conditions redox conditions. Barnard et al., 2017 have also suggested that the influent wastewater characteristics can become irrelevant if RAS fermentation is implemented. Interestingly, recent work has shown that the microbial community in conventional BPR systems has less diversity than sidestream RAS or MLSS fermentation systems; however, the functional community (primary organisms responsible for BPR) were similar regardless of configuration (Onniss-Hayden et al., 2019). These authors were also careful to suggest that the "superior" performance of RAS/MLSS fermentation systems may be due to positive bias in their comparison of facilities. Given these findings, it is still not clear to practitioners what may be driving RAS/MLSS fermentation systems to have stable BPR. This work investigates the underlying reasons for scenarios where implementing RAS or MLSS fermentation as part of a flexible BNR design can help to stabilize BPR. Specifically, this work documents how RAS/MLSS fermentation can be used to ensure that sufficient carbon is provided to a BPR system that is subjected to shifts in wastewater characteristics in response to peak flow conditions and cold temperatures.
This work investigates the underlying reasons for scenarios where implementing RAS or MLSS fermentation as part of a flexible BNR design can help to stabilize BPR. Specifically, this work documents how RAS/MLSS fermentation can be used to ensure that sufficient carbon is provided to a BPR system that is subjected to shifts in wastewater characteristics in response to peak flow conditions and cold temperatures. Historical data, profile sampling, phosphorus release batch tests, and 48-hour fermentation batch tests were performed at two facilities to determine the carbon generation potential of the MLSS and RAS.
SpeakerWankmuller, David
Presentation time
14:00:00
14:15:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionBringing It All Together: Guide to Designing and Implementing S2EBPR Processes
Session number502
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients
Author(s)
David Wankmuller
Author(s)D. Wankmuller1; W. Khunjar2; D. Forney3; J. Pridgen4;
Author affiliation(s)Hazen and Sawyer, Raleigh, NC 1Hazen and Sawyer, Fairfax, NC 2Town of Cary, Cary, NC 3City of Wilson, Wilson, NC 4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2021
DOI10.2175/193864718825158139
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2021
Word count19

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for...
In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10077925
Get access
-10077925
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for...
In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance
Abstract
As effluent nutrient limits get more stringent, water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) will continue to need to implement biological nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal. BPR systems in particular are susceptible to upset and many plants struggle to maintain BPR year-round because of a multitude of factors including, insufficient bioavailable carbon for PAOs, suboptimal aeration control, solids recycle impacts, excessive solids retention times, suboptimal pH operation, and secondary phosphorus release. Recently, it has been suggested that current BPR designs are inadequate for stable performance and that sidestream RAS fermentation is needed for stable BPR (Barnard et al., 2017). The authors propose that RAS fermentation selects for unique BPR organisms (e.g., Tetrasphaera) that can perform anoxic P uptake and also ferment in the presence of deeply anaerobic conditions redox conditions. Barnard et al., 2017 have also suggested that the influent wastewater characteristics can become irrelevant if RAS fermentation is implemented. Interestingly, recent work has shown that the microbial community in conventional BPR systems has less diversity than sidestream RAS or MLSS fermentation systems; however, the functional community (primary organisms responsible for BPR) were similar regardless of configuration (Onniss-Hayden et al., 2019). These authors were also careful to suggest that the "superior" performance of RAS/MLSS fermentation systems may be due to positive bias in their comparison of facilities. Given these findings, it is still not clear to practitioners what may be driving RAS/MLSS fermentation systems to have stable BPR. This work investigates the underlying reasons for scenarios where implementing RAS or MLSS fermentation as part of a flexible BNR design can help to stabilize BPR. Specifically, this work documents how RAS/MLSS fermentation can be used to ensure that sufficient carbon is provided to a BPR system that is subjected to shifts in wastewater characteristics in response to peak flow conditions and cold temperatures.
This work investigates the underlying reasons for scenarios where implementing RAS or MLSS fermentation as part of a flexible BNR design can help to stabilize BPR. Specifically, this work documents how RAS/MLSS fermentation can be used to ensure that sufficient carbon is provided to a BPR system that is subjected to shifts in wastewater characteristics in response to peak flow conditions and cold temperatures. Historical data, profile sampling, phosphorus release batch tests, and 48-hour fermentation batch tests were performed at two facilities to determine the carbon generation potential of the MLSS and RAS.
SpeakerWankmuller, David
Presentation time
14:00:00
14:15:00
Session time
13:30:00
15:00:00
SessionBringing It All Together: Guide to Designing and Implementing S2EBPR Processes
Session number502
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients
TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Municipal Wastewater Treatment Design, Nutrients
Author(s)
David Wankmuller
Author(s)D. Wankmuller1; W. Khunjar2; D. Forney3; J. Pridgen4;
Author affiliation(s)Hazen and Sawyer, Raleigh, NC 1Hazen and Sawyer, Fairfax, NC 2Town of Cary, Cary, NC 3City of Wilson, Wilson, NC 4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2021
DOI10.2175/193864718825158139
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2021
Word count19

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
David Wankmuller. In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance. Water Environment Federation, 2021. Web. 9 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10077925CITANCHOR>.
David Wankmuller. In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance. Water Environment Federation, 2021. Accessed June 9, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10077925CITANCHOR.
David Wankmuller
In-Tank Carbon Generation as a Primary Benefit of RAS and MLSS Fermentation for Stabilizing Biological Phosphorus Removal Performance
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 20, 2021
June 9, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10077925CITANCHOR