lastID = -10082020
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard...
More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-23 21:08:23 Adam Phillips Release
  • 2022-05-23 20:43:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-23 20:43:53 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard...
More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater

More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater

More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard...
More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater
Abstract
With many municipalities having excess anaerobic digester capacity, anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) provides an opportunity to improve biogas recovery while potentially reducing landfilling of organic municipal waste streams. In the United States, 12% of municipal solid wastes are yard trimmings (YT), which are often sent to landfills or composting for disposal (US EPA 2021a). However, YT landfilling and composting releases 475-1100 and 20-130 kg CO2 eq. per dry ton of fugitive methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide emissions per year, respectively (Brown and Chang 2014; Zhu-Baker et al. 2017). Utilizing yard trimmings as a co-digestion stream improves energy recovery, meets higher renewable energy credits (REU) credit standards than food waste and fats/oils/grease, and reduces climate impact due to fugitive emissions of CH4 and N2O. In this work, we developed nature-inspired bacterial enrichments for cellulose degradation and use them to pretreat common yard wastes to the Southwest and a stock chemical cellulose mixture. We evaluate the impacts of pretreatment using our inoculum and its improvement of CH4 production and landfilling offsets through sludge reduction as part of AcoD with thickened sludge. We cultivated lignocellulose-degrading batch inoculum over 10 generations based on feces obtained from Oryctolagus cuniculus domesticus, who primarily eat hays, grasses, and leafy matter with a digestive retention time of about 4 days. The inoculum were exposed to a variety of typical Phoenix yard waste & lantana and grass & or purchased cellulose. Each generation of inoculum was inoculated for 10-14 d, and then 1/10 of the total volume was added as seed for the next inoculum generation. An inoculum was used as the seed for fermenting reactors with 5-14 d hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Rehydrated plant matter was fed into the fermenters at 40 to 80 g DW/L each of lantana, grass, and cellulose. Fermented material was also fed to anaerobic co-digesters. Thickened sludge and seed anaerobic digester inoculum were provided by the City of Mesa, Arizona's Northwest Water Reclamation Plant (MNWWRP). To test pretreatment coupled with anaerobic digestion, AcoD reactors were fed the same amount of thickened sludge as the control plus an additional amount of material from the fermenters to maintain a 19.2-d HRT. We had two controls in the system: (1) only thickened sludge fed to control reactor was operated at a 25-d HRT to mimic MNWWRP; and (2) the same amount of thickened sludge was fed as a control plus 80 g DW/L undigested plant matter at a 19.2-d HRT. The reactors were allowed to operate at least 3 HRTs to achieve steady state prior to taking the data reported here. To ensure reactors would not sour, the pH in all reactors was kept at 7.5 ± 0.2 using NaOH for pH adjustment and CaCO3 to improve buffering capacity. We monitored pH, total and soluble COD (TCOD; SCOD), total and volatile solids (TS; VS), CH4, hydrogen gas, the volatile fatty acids (VFAs) of formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, valerate, and caproate, and lignocellulose content based on an Ankom 2000 fiber analyzer. YT prefermentation provided increased solubilization of plant matter to VFAs and with negligible biogas production. For example, VS decreased an average 29% at a 14-d HRT with 80g DW/L loading of YT. At the same time, SCOD increased 20% leaving the reactor, with 6.3% being converted to VFAs. While the analysis is still in process, it appears that proteins in the leaf matter and some hemicellulose were hydrolyzed to soluble forms. Our initial results show that AcoD fed prefermented YT has higher CH4 production and better volatile solids reduction than the control or AcoD with untreated YT. As an example using the prefermented YT discussed above, Figure 1 shows that AcoD fed prefermented YT and thickened sludge averaged the highest CH4 production, 330 mg CH4/d, versus 270 mg CH4/d for the control and 160 mg CH4/d for AcoD with untreated YT. The AcoD with prefermented YT also achieved the highest sludge reduction, 52%, versus 40% with the control and 43% AcoD with untreated YT. At the same time, the AcoD with prefermented YT had a lower yield of CH4 per g VS reduced (610 mL CH4/g VS) versus the control (914 mL CH4/g VS). This lower yield is likely due to lignocellulose being highly recalcitrant. The encouraging results with AcoD fed prefermented YT could have far reaching impacts on the wastewater and AcoD community. Based on these results for 4000 m3 (~879,000 gallon) capacity anaerobic digester, AcoD fed prefermented YT produces 184,000 m3/yr more CH4 than the control and 805,000 kg/yr of YT diverted from landfilling. In addition, the gas produced from YT qualifies for D3 cellulosic RIN credits as part of the EPA's Renewable Fuel Standards program versus other co-digestion streams like food waste and fats/oils/grease (FOG), which qualify for D5 RIN credits. Based on September 20, 2021, data, D3 RINs were worth $1.13 more than D5 RINs (US EPA 2021b).
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference in Columbus, Ohio, May 24-27, 2022.
SpeakerPittman, Smith
Presentation time
9:00:00
9:30:00
Session time
8:30:00
10:00:00
Session number07
Session locationGreater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio
TopicAnaerobic co-digestion, Biogas Production, sludge production rates
TopicAnaerobic co-digestion, Biogas Production, sludge production rates
Author(s)
S. Pittman
Author(s)S. Pittman1; M. Young2; B. Rittmann3
Author affiliation(s)Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology; 1Arizona State University; 2Arizona State University; 3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158395
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids
Copyright2022
Word count16

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard...
More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10082020
Get access
-10082020
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard...
More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater
Abstract
With many municipalities having excess anaerobic digester capacity, anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) provides an opportunity to improve biogas recovery while potentially reducing landfilling of organic municipal waste streams. In the United States, 12% of municipal solid wastes are yard trimmings (YT), which are often sent to landfills or composting for disposal (US EPA 2021a). However, YT landfilling and composting releases 475-1100 and 20-130 kg CO2 eq. per dry ton of fugitive methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide emissions per year, respectively (Brown and Chang 2014; Zhu-Baker et al. 2017). Utilizing yard trimmings as a co-digestion stream improves energy recovery, meets higher renewable energy credits (REU) credit standards than food waste and fats/oils/grease, and reduces climate impact due to fugitive emissions of CH4 and N2O. In this work, we developed nature-inspired bacterial enrichments for cellulose degradation and use them to pretreat common yard wastes to the Southwest and a stock chemical cellulose mixture. We evaluate the impacts of pretreatment using our inoculum and its improvement of CH4 production and landfilling offsets through sludge reduction as part of AcoD with thickened sludge. We cultivated lignocellulose-degrading batch inoculum over 10 generations based on feces obtained from Oryctolagus cuniculus domesticus, who primarily eat hays, grasses, and leafy matter with a digestive retention time of about 4 days. The inoculum were exposed to a variety of typical Phoenix yard waste & lantana and grass & or purchased cellulose. Each generation of inoculum was inoculated for 10-14 d, and then 1/10 of the total volume was added as seed for the next inoculum generation. An inoculum was used as the seed for fermenting reactors with 5-14 d hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Rehydrated plant matter was fed into the fermenters at 40 to 80 g DW/L each of lantana, grass, and cellulose. Fermented material was also fed to anaerobic co-digesters. Thickened sludge and seed anaerobic digester inoculum were provided by the City of Mesa, Arizona's Northwest Water Reclamation Plant (MNWWRP). To test pretreatment coupled with anaerobic digestion, AcoD reactors were fed the same amount of thickened sludge as the control plus an additional amount of material from the fermenters to maintain a 19.2-d HRT. We had two controls in the system: (1) only thickened sludge fed to control reactor was operated at a 25-d HRT to mimic MNWWRP; and (2) the same amount of thickened sludge was fed as a control plus 80 g DW/L undigested plant matter at a 19.2-d HRT. The reactors were allowed to operate at least 3 HRTs to achieve steady state prior to taking the data reported here. To ensure reactors would not sour, the pH in all reactors was kept at 7.5 ± 0.2 using NaOH for pH adjustment and CaCO3 to improve buffering capacity. We monitored pH, total and soluble COD (TCOD; SCOD), total and volatile solids (TS; VS), CH4, hydrogen gas, the volatile fatty acids (VFAs) of formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, valerate, and caproate, and lignocellulose content based on an Ankom 2000 fiber analyzer. YT prefermentation provided increased solubilization of plant matter to VFAs and with negligible biogas production. For example, VS decreased an average 29% at a 14-d HRT with 80g DW/L loading of YT. At the same time, SCOD increased 20% leaving the reactor, with 6.3% being converted to VFAs. While the analysis is still in process, it appears that proteins in the leaf matter and some hemicellulose were hydrolyzed to soluble forms. Our initial results show that AcoD fed prefermented YT has higher CH4 production and better volatile solids reduction than the control or AcoD with untreated YT. As an example using the prefermented YT discussed above, Figure 1 shows that AcoD fed prefermented YT and thickened sludge averaged the highest CH4 production, 330 mg CH4/d, versus 270 mg CH4/d for the control and 160 mg CH4/d for AcoD with untreated YT. The AcoD with prefermented YT also achieved the highest sludge reduction, 52%, versus 40% with the control and 43% AcoD with untreated YT. At the same time, the AcoD with prefermented YT had a lower yield of CH4 per g VS reduced (610 mL CH4/g VS) versus the control (914 mL CH4/g VS). This lower yield is likely due to lignocellulose being highly recalcitrant. The encouraging results with AcoD fed prefermented YT could have far reaching impacts on the wastewater and AcoD community. Based on these results for 4000 m3 (~879,000 gallon) capacity anaerobic digester, AcoD fed prefermented YT produces 184,000 m3/yr more CH4 than the control and 805,000 kg/yr of YT diverted from landfilling. In addition, the gas produced from YT qualifies for D3 cellulosic RIN credits as part of the EPA's Renewable Fuel Standards program versus other co-digestion streams like food waste and fats/oils/grease (FOG), which qualify for D5 RIN credits. Based on September 20, 2021, data, D3 RINs were worth $1.13 more than D5 RINs (US EPA 2021b).
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference in Columbus, Ohio, May 24-27, 2022.
SpeakerPittman, Smith
Presentation time
9:00:00
9:30:00
Session time
8:30:00
10:00:00
Session number07
Session locationGreater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio
TopicAnaerobic co-digestion, Biogas Production, sludge production rates
TopicAnaerobic co-digestion, Biogas Production, sludge production rates
Author(s)
S. Pittman
Author(s)S. Pittman1; M. Young2; B. Rittmann3
Author affiliation(s)Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology; 1Arizona State University; 2Arizona State University; 3
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2022
DOI10.2175/193864718825158395
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids
Copyright2022
Word count16

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
S. Pittman. More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Web. 6 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10082020CITANCHOR>.
S. Pittman. More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater. Water Environment Federation, 2022. Accessed September 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10082020CITANCHOR.
S. Pittman
More Methane and Less Landfilling? The Case for Anaerobic Co-digestion of Yard Trimmings and Wastewater
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
May 26, 2022
September 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10082020CITANCHOR