Access Water | Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at...
lastID = -10116820
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-05-04 06:59:28 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-05-01 21:29:08 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-05-01 11:17:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-05-01 09:27:25 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD

Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD

Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Abstract
FINDINGS & OBJECTIVE Northeast Ohio Regional Sanitary District's (NEORSD's) nine (9) dewatering centrifuges can handle a surprisingly diverse array of operating conditions and are capable of significant operational cost savings. These are findings based on unique full-scale centrifuge tests performed at its Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center (WWTC). The tests were done to understand how the centrifuges will work as upstream process conditions are stressed including wet-weather events and hydraulicly overloaded primary sludge gravity thickeners (GVTs). INTRODUCTION | BACKGROUND Wet-weather events greatly impact sludge operations at the WWTC. Operators try to maintain a >5-foot sludge blanket in the GVTs for downstream sludge storage and centrifuge operation purposes. However, wet weather events flush thinner sludge through the process and can overload GVTs. NEORSD engineering and operations wanted to determine if a consistently thinner sludge into the dewatering centrifuges would have any negative impacts to its operations. Allowing thinner sludge blankets at the primary clarifiers and GVTs would reduce hydraulic overloading incidents during wet-weather events. The goal of the testing was to simulate a lower solids sludge concentration (thin sludge) into a centrifuge and determine any needed setpoint changes for successful performance. A secondary goal of the testing was to optimize centrifuge operation including polymer dose and energy use. Six different tests were performed. The first two tests evaluated the impact of feeding low solid concentration sludge. Four additional tests were performed to optimize polymer use, recognize energy savings, and abilities to control percent cake total solids. The testing revealed that thin sludge down at least 0.8% can be successfully fed to dewatering without negative impacts to polymer, centrate quality, or cake total solids. In addition, at much as a 30% polymer dose savings could be recognized and electrical energy savings are possible. Process Flow Description The WWTC utilizes four (4) Sludge Storage Tanks to hold Primary Sludge (PS) and Excess Activated Sludge (EAS) prior to centrifuge dewatering and incineration. At the Sludge Storage Tank complex, three (3) Centrifuge Feed Pumps (CFPs) feed the sludge to the Renewable Energy Facility (REF) for centrifuge dewatering. The REF includes three (3) equipment trains, each consisting of three (3) centrifuges, design to operate at around 200 GPM each. The target minimum solids concentration of the centrifuge cake is 28%. The target for centrate capture rate is greater than 95%. Test Preparation A rigorous testing protocol was developed to create clarity in roles, responsibilities, sampling points, measurement locations, data recording. One unique aspect of the testing setup was how to introduce Non-Potable Water (NPW) into the centrifuge feed piping to simulate a desired thin sludge concentration. NPW introduction was made via a temporary piping system with clamp-on ultrasonic flow meter and globe valve for flow control. Polymer bench testing with feed sludge was performed to observe if any deleterious polymer consumption impacts were created with the introduction of NPW. FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Test #1 - Thin Sludge, Low Solids Loading Rate Testing included introduction of NPW into the feed sludge pipeline for a single centrifuge. The goal of this test was to confirm stable operations of thinned sludge, as low as 0.5% TS, down to the machine's minimum rated total solids throughput of 1,500 lbs/hr and determine if parameters need to be adjusted for stable operations. Operation of the centrifuge was unaffected with the NPW addition, feed sludge as low as 0.84% total solids, and machine loading rate to its minimum of 1,500 lbs/hr. Centrifuge performance maintained its Torque, Centrate Quality, and Cake Total Solids. No operational impacts were identified. These results add confidence to NEORSD's operations group that the dewatering system will handle thin sludge if it is encountered in the future due to wet weather events. Test #2 - Thin Sludge and High Solids Loading The goal of this test was to confirm stable operations of thinned sludge, with a 350 GPM hydraulic limitation, up to the machine's maximum rated total solids throughput of 4,500 lbs/hr and determine if parameters need to be adjusted for stable operations. Feed sludge total solids were sampled and tested prior to the beginning of the test. The sludge flow rate was then increased to the calculated maximum solids loading rate of 4,500 lbs/hr. Once stable centrifuge operation was confirmed at 4,500 lbs/hr, NPW water was introduced to achieve thinned sludge without exceeding the centrifuge maximum hydraulic loading rate. Operation of the centrifuge was unaffected with the NPW addition, operating at the maximum hydraulic feed rate of 350 GPM, and with a thinned sludge down to as low as 1.79% TS during this test. Centrifuge performance maintained its Torque, Centrate Quality, and Cake Total Solids. No operational impacts were identified. These results confirm the solids capacity of the machine, the machine's ability to run at the hydraulic maximum, and ability to handle changing conditions without impacting normal operation parameters. Test #3 - Polymer Reduction Optimization Polymer optimization is the process of adjusting the polymer dose without losing performance in cake total solids or centrate capture rate. The goal of this test was to determine if lower polymer dosing rates can produce similar centrifuge performance. The result of lower polymer dose at similar performance is a cost saving measure that NEORSD may consider in future operations. The process of reducing polymer dose on an existing centrifuge is an operator adjustment via the SCADA system. During the testing, polymer was reduced to as low as 5.2 lbs/dt active polymer dose while still achieving a 95% solids recover/capture rate. This represents a 30% polymer savings potential versus current full-scale operations and an opportunity for significant cost savings with limited impacts to operations. Test #4 - Increasing Centrifuge Bowl Speed for Cake Solids Control The centrifuge's normal operating speed was increased from the current setpoint of 2300 RPM up to 2500 RPM to observe any operational change or improvements. The centrifuge manufacturer's O&M Manual indicated that 2500 RPM is the recommended rotational bowl speed; higher than the 2300 RPM that the bowls have operated since they were commissioned. During testing, centrifuge operations were basically unchanged while the bowl speed was increased. The higher bowl did not reduce flocculation stabilization, nor did it provide any observable value to operations. The downside of operating at the higher bowl speed is the energy cost, increasing wear on the bearings, and increasing potential for vibration issues. Test #5 - Centrifuge Lower Bowl Speed The centrifuge's normal operating speed was decreased from the current setpoint of 2300 RPM to as low as 2000 RPM to observe operational changes or improvements. The speed at which cake total solids concentration decrease was at 2000 RPM. This offers and opportunity for energy savings if the bowl speed is reduced permanently. Data collected during the testing showed an 11-amp energy savings. In addition, if a lower bowl speed can be implemented less wear-and-tear on the centrifuge bearings and lower vibration offers an opportunity to extend equipment life. Test #6 - Centrifuge Lower Torque This test was performed to observe how a lower torque setting will decrease cake total solids. This could be used as a tool by operators if feed solids are too dry for the incinerator. Centrifuge torque was reduced from its current setpoint of 50% down to as low as 42% with performance impacts. Lowering the torque setpoint created a wetter cake as predicted. Operations may use this adjustment to manage their cake total solids going to the incinerator, especially if the solids are dry and the incinerator is overheated. DISCUSSION & RESULTS Six different centrifuge tests were performed, each of them provided additional insight to NEORSD operations staff. The robustness of the centrifuge operating system was confirmed with differing sludge concentrations and throughputs to handle future scenarios. Significant cost savings potentials and operational flexibility with polymer use and operating parameters were also confirmed. NEORSD is continuing to improve their processes with the knowledge of full-scale testing. The testing effort allows improvements to their system by providing reliable, efficient, and robust solids processing. Attendees of this presentation can gain detailed knowledge of centrifuge operation and understanding optimization opportunities at their facilities.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals & Biosolids and Innovations in Treatment Technology Joint Conference, May 6-9, 2025.
SpeakerParmenter, Adam
Presentation time
16:05:00
16:25:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
SessionCase Studies for Optimizing THP, Dewatering, and Digestion
Session number7
Session locationBaltimore Convention Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Biosolids, Dewatering Optimization, Energy and Carbon Neutrality, fugitive methane emission, Full-scale Optimization, Greenhouse Gases, Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion, Odor/Air Emissions, Operations And Maintenance, Process modeling, Reliability, Sludge Digestion, THP, THP, CAMBI
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Biosolids, Dewatering Optimization, Energy and Carbon Neutrality, fugitive methane emission, Full-scale Optimization, Greenhouse Gases, Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion, Odor/Air Emissions, Operations And Maintenance, Process modeling, Reliability, Sludge Digestion, THP, THP, CAMBI
Author(s)
Parmenter, Adam, Merchant-Wells, Nicholas
Author(s)A. Parmenter1, N. Merchant-Wells2
Author affiliation(s)HDR, 1Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, 2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825159779
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Word count11

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10116820
Get access
-10116820
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Abstract
FINDINGS & OBJECTIVE Northeast Ohio Regional Sanitary District's (NEORSD's) nine (9) dewatering centrifuges can handle a surprisingly diverse array of operating conditions and are capable of significant operational cost savings. These are findings based on unique full-scale centrifuge tests performed at its Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center (WWTC). The tests were done to understand how the centrifuges will work as upstream process conditions are stressed including wet-weather events and hydraulicly overloaded primary sludge gravity thickeners (GVTs). INTRODUCTION | BACKGROUND Wet-weather events greatly impact sludge operations at the WWTC. Operators try to maintain a >5-foot sludge blanket in the GVTs for downstream sludge storage and centrifuge operation purposes. However, wet weather events flush thinner sludge through the process and can overload GVTs. NEORSD engineering and operations wanted to determine if a consistently thinner sludge into the dewatering centrifuges would have any negative impacts to its operations. Allowing thinner sludge blankets at the primary clarifiers and GVTs would reduce hydraulic overloading incidents during wet-weather events. The goal of the testing was to simulate a lower solids sludge concentration (thin sludge) into a centrifuge and determine any needed setpoint changes for successful performance. A secondary goal of the testing was to optimize centrifuge operation including polymer dose and energy use. Six different tests were performed. The first two tests evaluated the impact of feeding low solid concentration sludge. Four additional tests were performed to optimize polymer use, recognize energy savings, and abilities to control percent cake total solids. The testing revealed that thin sludge down at least 0.8% can be successfully fed to dewatering without negative impacts to polymer, centrate quality, or cake total solids. In addition, at much as a 30% polymer dose savings could be recognized and electrical energy savings are possible. Process Flow Description The WWTC utilizes four (4) Sludge Storage Tanks to hold Primary Sludge (PS) and Excess Activated Sludge (EAS) prior to centrifuge dewatering and incineration. At the Sludge Storage Tank complex, three (3) Centrifuge Feed Pumps (CFPs) feed the sludge to the Renewable Energy Facility (REF) for centrifuge dewatering. The REF includes three (3) equipment trains, each consisting of three (3) centrifuges, design to operate at around 200 GPM each. The target minimum solids concentration of the centrifuge cake is 28%. The target for centrate capture rate is greater than 95%. Test Preparation A rigorous testing protocol was developed to create clarity in roles, responsibilities, sampling points, measurement locations, data recording. One unique aspect of the testing setup was how to introduce Non-Potable Water (NPW) into the centrifuge feed piping to simulate a desired thin sludge concentration. NPW introduction was made via a temporary piping system with clamp-on ultrasonic flow meter and globe valve for flow control. Polymer bench testing with feed sludge was performed to observe if any deleterious polymer consumption impacts were created with the introduction of NPW. FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Test #1 - Thin Sludge, Low Solids Loading Rate Testing included introduction of NPW into the feed sludge pipeline for a single centrifuge. The goal of this test was to confirm stable operations of thinned sludge, as low as 0.5% TS, down to the machine's minimum rated total solids throughput of 1,500 lbs/hr and determine if parameters need to be adjusted for stable operations. Operation of the centrifuge was unaffected with the NPW addition, feed sludge as low as 0.84% total solids, and machine loading rate to its minimum of 1,500 lbs/hr. Centrifuge performance maintained its Torque, Centrate Quality, and Cake Total Solids. No operational impacts were identified. These results add confidence to NEORSD's operations group that the dewatering system will handle thin sludge if it is encountered in the future due to wet weather events. Test #2 - Thin Sludge and High Solids Loading The goal of this test was to confirm stable operations of thinned sludge, with a 350 GPM hydraulic limitation, up to the machine's maximum rated total solids throughput of 4,500 lbs/hr and determine if parameters need to be adjusted for stable operations. Feed sludge total solids were sampled and tested prior to the beginning of the test. The sludge flow rate was then increased to the calculated maximum solids loading rate of 4,500 lbs/hr. Once stable centrifuge operation was confirmed at 4,500 lbs/hr, NPW water was introduced to achieve thinned sludge without exceeding the centrifuge maximum hydraulic loading rate. Operation of the centrifuge was unaffected with the NPW addition, operating at the maximum hydraulic feed rate of 350 GPM, and with a thinned sludge down to as low as 1.79% TS during this test. Centrifuge performance maintained its Torque, Centrate Quality, and Cake Total Solids. No operational impacts were identified. These results confirm the solids capacity of the machine, the machine's ability to run at the hydraulic maximum, and ability to handle changing conditions without impacting normal operation parameters. Test #3 - Polymer Reduction Optimization Polymer optimization is the process of adjusting the polymer dose without losing performance in cake total solids or centrate capture rate. The goal of this test was to determine if lower polymer dosing rates can produce similar centrifuge performance. The result of lower polymer dose at similar performance is a cost saving measure that NEORSD may consider in future operations. The process of reducing polymer dose on an existing centrifuge is an operator adjustment via the SCADA system. During the testing, polymer was reduced to as low as 5.2 lbs/dt active polymer dose while still achieving a 95% solids recover/capture rate. This represents a 30% polymer savings potential versus current full-scale operations and an opportunity for significant cost savings with limited impacts to operations. Test #4 - Increasing Centrifuge Bowl Speed for Cake Solids Control The centrifuge's normal operating speed was increased from the current setpoint of 2300 RPM up to 2500 RPM to observe any operational change or improvements. The centrifuge manufacturer's O&M Manual indicated that 2500 RPM is the recommended rotational bowl speed; higher than the 2300 RPM that the bowls have operated since they were commissioned. During testing, centrifuge operations were basically unchanged while the bowl speed was increased. The higher bowl did not reduce flocculation stabilization, nor did it provide any observable value to operations. The downside of operating at the higher bowl speed is the energy cost, increasing wear on the bearings, and increasing potential for vibration issues. Test #5 - Centrifuge Lower Bowl Speed The centrifuge's normal operating speed was decreased from the current setpoint of 2300 RPM to as low as 2000 RPM to observe operational changes or improvements. The speed at which cake total solids concentration decrease was at 2000 RPM. This offers and opportunity for energy savings if the bowl speed is reduced permanently. Data collected during the testing showed an 11-amp energy savings. In addition, if a lower bowl speed can be implemented less wear-and-tear on the centrifuge bearings and lower vibration offers an opportunity to extend equipment life. Test #6 - Centrifuge Lower Torque This test was performed to observe how a lower torque setting will decrease cake total solids. This could be used as a tool by operators if feed solids are too dry for the incinerator. Centrifuge torque was reduced from its current setpoint of 50% down to as low as 42% with performance impacts. Lowering the torque setpoint created a wetter cake as predicted. Operations may use this adjustment to manage their cake total solids going to the incinerator, especially if the solids are dry and the incinerator is overheated. DISCUSSION & RESULTS Six different centrifuge tests were performed, each of them provided additional insight to NEORSD operations staff. The robustness of the centrifuge operating system was confirmed with differing sludge concentrations and throughputs to handle future scenarios. Significant cost savings potentials and operational flexibility with polymer use and operating parameters were also confirmed. NEORSD is continuing to improve their processes with the knowledge of full-scale testing. The testing effort allows improvements to their system by providing reliable, efficient, and robust solids processing. Attendees of this presentation can gain detailed knowledge of centrifuge operation and understanding optimization opportunities at their facilities.
This paper was presented at the WEF Residuals & Biosolids and Innovations in Treatment Technology Joint Conference, May 6-9, 2025.
SpeakerParmenter, Adam
Presentation time
16:05:00
16:25:00
Session time
13:30:00
16:45:00
SessionCase Studies for Optimizing THP, Dewatering, and Digestion
Session number7
Session locationBaltimore Convention Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Biosolids, Dewatering Optimization, Energy and Carbon Neutrality, fugitive methane emission, Full-scale Optimization, Greenhouse Gases, Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion, Odor/Air Emissions, Operations And Maintenance, Process modeling, Reliability, Sludge Digestion, THP, THP, CAMBI
TopicAnaerobic Digestion, Biosolids, Dewatering Optimization, Energy and Carbon Neutrality, fugitive methane emission, Full-scale Optimization, Greenhouse Gases, Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion, Odor/Air Emissions, Operations And Maintenance, Process modeling, Reliability, Sludge Digestion, THP, THP, CAMBI
Author(s)
Parmenter, Adam, Merchant-Wells, Nicholas
Author(s)A. Parmenter1, N. Merchant-Wells2
Author affiliation(s)HDR, 1Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, 2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825159779
Volume / Issue
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Word count11

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Parmenter, Adam. Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 18 May. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10116820CITANCHOR>.
Parmenter, Adam. Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed May 18, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10116820CITANCHOR.
Parmenter, Adam
Centrifuge Operational Adjustments Result in Cost Saving Opportunities at NEORSD
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
May 7, 2025
May 18, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10116820CITANCHOR