Access Water | Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
lastID = -10118759
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:23:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 07:02:04 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 15:57:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:48:32 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:06:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:14:39 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners

Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners

Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Abstract
Introduction
Wastewater treatment plants face stricter nitrogen (TN) discharge limits, increasing reliance on external carbon (C) sources for nitrogen (N) removal, which drives up costs and external dependencies. Advances in short-cut N removal processes, like PdNA, reduce carbon use but still depend on significant external C dosing. Influent wastewater carbon is less effective for N removal due to aerobic consumption, whereas external carbon dosing avoids oxygen-related losses (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). Primary sludge fermentate is a low-cost carbon source that could reduce reliance on external carbon, such as methanol (MeOH) (Ali et al., 2021). However, variable organic yields and fermentate quality present challenges (Sánchez Rubal et al., 2012). Factors like wastewater characteristics, seasonal conditions, and sewer fermentation activity affect consistency.

Preliminary bench-scale tests at Blue Plains showed potential yields of 0.2 g sCOD/g VSS but also increased phosphorus release and odor. This study expands fermentation tests in full-scale gravity thickeners to assess fermentate quality, nutrient release, and odor formation under realistic conditions, optimizing N and P removal processes.

Materials and Methodology
Fermentation tests were conducted in the gravity thickener (GT) at Blue Plains AWWTP over seven months with controlled sludge blanket height covering a range of SRTs and varying operational and seasonal conditions (Fig. 1). Grab samples were collected from the primary sludge influent, GT overflow, and three depths of sludge blanket. A complete elutriation assumption was applied to estimate weighted organic yields (sCOD), nutrient release (orthophosphate, ammonia, iron). Additionally, odor samples were tested for odor detection thresholds (ASTM E679 and EN13725) and total reduced sulfur and compositions (ASTM D5504-20), while a gas analyzer (Odalog) provided real-time H2S monitoring onsite.

Result and Discussion
SRT control in gravity thickeners
SRT in gravity thickeners was controlled by maintaining sludge blanket targets (Fig. 1A). Flow to the gravity thickener was stabilized to enhance consistency (Fig. 1B). Improved system stability typically led to higher sCOD yields, while instability, often during morning samples, resulted in lower yields (Fig. 1C, Fig. 1D).

Stability, assessed via carbon (C) and phosphorus (P) mass balance errors, was higher when errors stayed below 20%. Yields varied within the 1—1.5-day SRT range, with better stability crucial for optimizing fermentate quality in full-scale operations.

COD and nutrient yields (N, P, Fe) under full elutriation assumption
The COD and nutrient yields were based on full gravity thickener profiles, reflecting 100% elutriation since no elutriation occurred under current conditions. Typically, 20% of soluble compounds from fermentation are lost in the underflow (WRF Project 4975, 2023). sCOD yield increased with SRT (Fig. 2A), though variability beyond 1 day suggests other influencing factors. Among 11 data points (SRT 1—1.5 days), five showed high-quality fermentate (>0.2 g sCOD/g VSS), while six showed lower quality (<0.2 g sCOD/g VSS). High-quality fermentate correlated with mass balance errors <30%, while poor quality correlated with >30% errors, indicating instability in GT operations. Factors such as primary clarifier operation and GT underflow influenced stability, with lack of control strategies being a bottleneck. NH4-N yield varied without clear SRT trends (Fig. 2B), averaging 20 ± 7.5 mg N/L at SRT >1 day. P release increased with SRT (Fig. 2C), with 1.64 g Fe released per gram of OP-P, enabling 61% P removal using current Fe/P ratios.

GTO and future fermentate composition
Previous studies showed that increased SRT improved compression (SVI30 from 48 to 36 mL/g) but created smaller, harder-to-flocculate particles (TOF > 700 mg TSS/L) (Islam et al., 2024). Higher sludge blankets at SRT > 1.25 days raised GTO TSS (Fig. 2E). To balance sCOD and nutrient yields with settling, too long SRTs should be avoided.

In Table 1, GTO and thus fermentate composition at a SRT of 1-1.25 days are calculated assuming 80% elutriation. This can lead to current GTO flows and denitrification stoichiometry and yield coefficient of 5.4 sCOD/g NO3-N (Lee et al., 2024) to a potential MeOH saving of 22±8%. When using fermentate for PdNA, this MeOH saving can be increased to 28 to 62% at PdNA efficiencies of 30-60%.

Odor emissions
Odor is a key side effect of fermentation, with H2S measured continuously and odor units/organic sulfur assessed at intervals. H2S levels reached 8537 ppbv, and odor detection peaked at 360,000 OU/m3 for SRT <1.25 days. Odor emissions increased in level and variability at SRT >1.5 days (Fig. 3), correlating with higher SRTs. Maintaining an optimal SRT (1—1.25 days) minimizes excessive microbial degradation and odor emissions while preserving fermentate quality. Further investigation is needed to understand variability and improve odor treatment design without overestimating for worst-case scenarios.

Conclusion
This study quantified fermentation yields, nutrient release, and odor production during full-scale gravity thickening under varying conditions. It provides guidelines to optimize fermentate quality with high sCOD yield, advancing fermentation to reduce MeOH use and leveraging GT as a fermenter.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
11:00:00
11:15:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionFull-Scale Primary Sludge Fermentation
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Author(s)
Islam, Shafkat, Ngo, Khoa Nam, Zaveri, Jaydev, Fitenko, Alexander, Mensah, Joshuan, Riffat, Rumana, Gu, April, Massoudieh, Arash, De Clippeleir, Haydee
Author(s)S. Islam1, K. Ngo2, J. Zaveri3, A. Fitenko3, J. Mensah4, R. Riffat1, A. Gu3, A. Massoudieh4, H. De Clippeleir2, , , ,
Author affiliation(s)George Washington University1, DC Water and Sewer Authority2, Cornell University3, The Catholic University of America4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160025
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count10

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118759
Get access
-10118759
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Abstract
Introduction
Wastewater treatment plants face stricter nitrogen (TN) discharge limits, increasing reliance on external carbon (C) sources for nitrogen (N) removal, which drives up costs and external dependencies. Advances in short-cut N removal processes, like PdNA, reduce carbon use but still depend on significant external C dosing. Influent wastewater carbon is less effective for N removal due to aerobic consumption, whereas external carbon dosing avoids oxygen-related losses (Ladipo-Obasa et al., 2022). Primary sludge fermentate is a low-cost carbon source that could reduce reliance on external carbon, such as methanol (MeOH) (Ali et al., 2021). However, variable organic yields and fermentate quality present challenges (Sánchez Rubal et al., 2012). Factors like wastewater characteristics, seasonal conditions, and sewer fermentation activity affect consistency.

Preliminary bench-scale tests at Blue Plains showed potential yields of 0.2 g sCOD/g VSS but also increased phosphorus release and odor. This study expands fermentation tests in full-scale gravity thickeners to assess fermentate quality, nutrient release, and odor formation under realistic conditions, optimizing N and P removal processes.

Materials and Methodology
Fermentation tests were conducted in the gravity thickener (GT) at Blue Plains AWWTP over seven months with controlled sludge blanket height covering a range of SRTs and varying operational and seasonal conditions (Fig. 1). Grab samples were collected from the primary sludge influent, GT overflow, and three depths of sludge blanket. A complete elutriation assumption was applied to estimate weighted organic yields (sCOD), nutrient release (orthophosphate, ammonia, iron). Additionally, odor samples were tested for odor detection thresholds (ASTM E679 and EN13725) and total reduced sulfur and compositions (ASTM D5504-20), while a gas analyzer (Odalog) provided real-time H2S monitoring onsite.

Result and Discussion
SRT control in gravity thickeners
SRT in gravity thickeners was controlled by maintaining sludge blanket targets (Fig. 1A). Flow to the gravity thickener was stabilized to enhance consistency (Fig. 1B). Improved system stability typically led to higher sCOD yields, while instability, often during morning samples, resulted in lower yields (Fig. 1C, Fig. 1D).

Stability, assessed via carbon (C) and phosphorus (P) mass balance errors, was higher when errors stayed below 20%. Yields varied within the 1—1.5-day SRT range, with better stability crucial for optimizing fermentate quality in full-scale operations.

COD and nutrient yields (N, P, Fe) under full elutriation assumption
The COD and nutrient yields were based on full gravity thickener profiles, reflecting 100% elutriation since no elutriation occurred under current conditions. Typically, 20% of soluble compounds from fermentation are lost in the underflow (WRF Project 4975, 2023). sCOD yield increased with SRT (Fig. 2A), though variability beyond 1 day suggests other influencing factors. Among 11 data points (SRT 1—1.5 days), five showed high-quality fermentate (>0.2 g sCOD/g VSS), while six showed lower quality (<0.2 g sCOD/g VSS). High-quality fermentate correlated with mass balance errors <30%, while poor quality correlated with >30% errors, indicating instability in GT operations. Factors such as primary clarifier operation and GT underflow influenced stability, with lack of control strategies being a bottleneck. NH4-N yield varied without clear SRT trends (Fig. 2B), averaging 20 ± 7.5 mg N/L at SRT >1 day. P release increased with SRT (Fig. 2C), with 1.64 g Fe released per gram of OP-P, enabling 61% P removal using current Fe/P ratios.

GTO and future fermentate composition
Previous studies showed that increased SRT improved compression (SVI30 from 48 to 36 mL/g) but created smaller, harder-to-flocculate particles (TOF > 700 mg TSS/L) (Islam et al., 2024). Higher sludge blankets at SRT > 1.25 days raised GTO TSS (Fig. 2E). To balance sCOD and nutrient yields with settling, too long SRTs should be avoided.

In Table 1, GTO and thus fermentate composition at a SRT of 1-1.25 days are calculated assuming 80% elutriation. This can lead to current GTO flows and denitrification stoichiometry and yield coefficient of 5.4 sCOD/g NO3-N (Lee et al., 2024) to a potential MeOH saving of 22±8%. When using fermentate for PdNA, this MeOH saving can be increased to 28 to 62% at PdNA efficiencies of 30-60%.

Odor emissions
Odor is a key side effect of fermentation, with H2S measured continuously and odor units/organic sulfur assessed at intervals. H2S levels reached 8537 ppbv, and odor detection peaked at 360,000 OU/m3 for SRT <1.25 days. Odor emissions increased in level and variability at SRT >1.5 days (Fig. 3), correlating with higher SRTs. Maintaining an optimal SRT (1—1.25 days) minimizes excessive microbial degradation and odor emissions while preserving fermentate quality. Further investigation is needed to understand variability and improve odor treatment design without overestimating for worst-case scenarios.

Conclusion
This study quantified fermentation yields, nutrient release, and odor production during full-scale gravity thickening under varying conditions. It provides guidelines to optimize fermentate quality with high sCOD yield, advancing fermentation to reduce MeOH use and leveraging GT as a fermenter.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
11:00:00
11:15:00
Session time
10:30:00
12:00:00
SessionFull-Scale Primary Sludge Fermentation
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
TopicLiquid Stream Treatment - Nutrient Removal and Recovery
Author(s)
Islam, Shafkat, Ngo, Khoa Nam, Zaveri, Jaydev, Fitenko, Alexander, Mensah, Joshuan, Riffat, Rumana, Gu, April, Massoudieh, Arash, De Clippeleir, Haydee
Author(s)S. Islam1, K. Ngo2, J. Zaveri3, A. Fitenko3, J. Mensah4, R. Riffat1, A. Gu3, A. Massoudieh4, H. De Clippeleir2, , , ,
Author affiliation(s)George Washington University1, DC Water and Sewer Authority2, Cornell University3, The Catholic University of America4
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160025
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count10

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Islam, Shafkat. Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 6 Dec. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118759CITANCHOR>.
Islam, Shafkat. Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed December 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118759CITANCHOR.
Islam, Shafkat
Investigating Fermentation of Primary Sludge in Full-Scale Gravity Thickeners
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
October 1, 2025
December 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118759CITANCHOR