Access Water | Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at...
lastID = -10118842
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low...
Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2025-10-23 10:21:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-25 06:57:48 Adam Phillips Continuous release
  • 2025-09-16 16:00:19 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-04 05:43:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 21:09:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2025-09-02 16:16:17 Adam Phillips
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low...
Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions

Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions

Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low...
Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions
Abstract
Background
Low dissolved oxygen (DO) operation (0.3 — 0.6 mg/L) enables biological nutrient removal (BNR) facilities to reduce energy and costs associated with aeration while achieving nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Although operator concerns about nitrification at low DO exist, our previous work shows that efficient nitrification is possible at low DO because low DO operation leads to biological selection of nitrification communities with high oxygen affinities1. Nitrification often occurs in a two-step process by autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB). However, nitrifiers are a diverse community, with ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA) and complete ammonia oxidizing bacteria (comammox, CMX) contributing to ammonia removal (Figure 1). Nitrifiers at low DO concentrations adapt with lower apparent half saturation constants (KDO) 1. It is unclear if these lower observed KDO values are due to selection of different nitrifiers or another mechanism. Initial qPCR results showed that the efficient nitrification at low DO coincides with an increase in the relative abundance of comammox. Yet current methods to determine the nitrification kinetics do not distinguish between active nitrifiers. The KDO of specific nitrifiers like comammox have yet to be reported 2. Additionally, investigating comammox kinetics is important for low DO operation, as comammox abundance may coincide with a decrease in nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions because comammox lacks nitric oxide reductases (NOR) that produce N2O through the nitrifier denitrification pathway3. In this study, the KDO for individual nitrifying communities were determined across low DO, mid DO, and high DO operating regimes, in addition to capturing the associated N2O generation. This will provide a better understanding of low DO nitrification, enabling more confidence in designing plants to operate at low DO. Objective: Determine KDO values for individual nitrifying organisms, including AOB and Comammox, to investigate if adaptations to low DO concentrations are driven by the selection of different nitrifiers.

Methods
A 200-L pilot-scale reactor was operated as an A2/O process, detailed in our previous work1. Three experimental phases were completed to facilitate varying nitrifier diversity based on changes to bulk DO: Phase 1 DO = 0.3 mg/L (Low DO), Phase 2 DO = 0.8 mg/L (Mid DO), Phase 3 DO = 2.0 mg/L (High DO). After three SRTs at the operating DO, steady state was established for the reactors. Reactor chemical performance was tracked weekly to evaluate nutrient removal, and DNA analysis was also performed weekly to evaluate microbial changes in the nitrifying communities.

The KDO and maximum ammonia removal rates were determined for ammonia oxidation, while monitoring N2O production with Unisense N2O probes. Mixed liquor samples from the pilot plant were controlled in batch tests at a specified DO setpoint (i.e., 0.2, 0.5, 0.7 and 2 mg O2/L). At the beginning of the test, 30 mg/L of NH3-N was added, and all nitrogen species were measured for 1-2 hours. Inhibitory chemicals were added to isolate nitrifier communities: Chlorate inhibits comammox, and 1-octyne inhibits AOB (Table 1) 6,7,8.9. Initial OUR testing determined the dosage of inhibitory chemicals to add.

Results
Nitrification was well maintained in all phases, with average effluent ammonia concentrations of 0.37 ± 0.71 mg/L at low DO, 0.05 ± 0.02 mg/L at mid DO, and 0.19 ± 0.11 mg/L at high DO. Low liquid phase N2O was usually observed in the reactor but peaks in N2O were observed when DO was outside of the desired operating band for an extended period. Monod curves were fitted for each experiment within each reactor operating phase to determine the KDO and the maximum activity rate. When considering the entire nitrifying community, or when no biomass was inhibited, lower KDO were observed at lower bulk DO conditions (Figure 2). Specifically, for the same test when all microbial community contributions to nitrification are considered, biomass acclimated to low DO had a KDO of 0.25 mg/L, compared to a high DO KDO of 1.21 mg/L, confirming the expectation that nitrifiers in lower DO systems adapt with lower observed KDO values (Table 2).

Initial qPCR results showed that the relative abundance of comammox was the highest at low DO (10.9%), but AOB and canonical NOB remained as the dominant nitrifiers in the system. All qPCR results will be included in the conference presentation. Inhibition testing confirmed lower KDO values for comammox at low and mid DO, demonstrating higher oxygen affinity and enhanced nitrification (Figure 3). Additionally, for all DO operation modes, the CMX KDO is lower than the overall KDO and the nitritation KDO, as well as the maximum growth rate. The CMX KDO for low DO and mid DO sludge ranged from 0.15 to 0.23 mg/L and since the comammox abundance appears to increase with the reduction in DO, the presence of comammox seems to help explain the overall KDO reduction with the low DO sludge1.

Conclusion and Significance Comammox KDO is lower than the AOB KDO at Low and Mid DO conditions, providing a selective advantage for comammox at low DO conditions and enabling nitrification. AOB may not adapt to low DO; however, due to the comammox selection at low DO, nitrification is possible.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
08:40:00
08:50:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:00:00
SessionMicrobial Selection and Performance Under Low DO Conditions
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicResearch
TopicResearch
Author(s)
Wittman, Megan, Sturm, Belinda, Hiripitiyage, Yasawantha, Jimenez, Jose, Miller, Mark, Bauhs, Kayla
Author(s)M. Wittman1, B. Sturm1, Y. Hiripitiyage1, J. Jimenez2, M. Miller2, K. Bauhs2
Author affiliation(s)University of Kansas1, Brown and Caldwell2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160108
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count15

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low...
Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-10118842
Get access
-10118842
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low...
Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions
Abstract
Background
Low dissolved oxygen (DO) operation (0.3 — 0.6 mg/L) enables biological nutrient removal (BNR) facilities to reduce energy and costs associated with aeration while achieving nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Although operator concerns about nitrification at low DO exist, our previous work shows that efficient nitrification is possible at low DO because low DO operation leads to biological selection of nitrification communities with high oxygen affinities1. Nitrification often occurs in a two-step process by autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB). However, nitrifiers are a diverse community, with ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA) and complete ammonia oxidizing bacteria (comammox, CMX) contributing to ammonia removal (Figure 1). Nitrifiers at low DO concentrations adapt with lower apparent half saturation constants (KDO) 1. It is unclear if these lower observed KDO values are due to selection of different nitrifiers or another mechanism. Initial qPCR results showed that the efficient nitrification at low DO coincides with an increase in the relative abundance of comammox. Yet current methods to determine the nitrification kinetics do not distinguish between active nitrifiers. The KDO of specific nitrifiers like comammox have yet to be reported 2. Additionally, investigating comammox kinetics is important for low DO operation, as comammox abundance may coincide with a decrease in nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions because comammox lacks nitric oxide reductases (NOR) that produce N2O through the nitrifier denitrification pathway3. In this study, the KDO for individual nitrifying communities were determined across low DO, mid DO, and high DO operating regimes, in addition to capturing the associated N2O generation. This will provide a better understanding of low DO nitrification, enabling more confidence in designing plants to operate at low DO. Objective: Determine KDO values for individual nitrifying organisms, including AOB and Comammox, to investigate if adaptations to low DO concentrations are driven by the selection of different nitrifiers.

Methods
A 200-L pilot-scale reactor was operated as an A2/O process, detailed in our previous work1. Three experimental phases were completed to facilitate varying nitrifier diversity based on changes to bulk DO: Phase 1 DO = 0.3 mg/L (Low DO), Phase 2 DO = 0.8 mg/L (Mid DO), Phase 3 DO = 2.0 mg/L (High DO). After three SRTs at the operating DO, steady state was established for the reactors. Reactor chemical performance was tracked weekly to evaluate nutrient removal, and DNA analysis was also performed weekly to evaluate microbial changes in the nitrifying communities.

The KDO and maximum ammonia removal rates were determined for ammonia oxidation, while monitoring N2O production with Unisense N2O probes. Mixed liquor samples from the pilot plant were controlled in batch tests at a specified DO setpoint (i.e., 0.2, 0.5, 0.7 and 2 mg O2/L). At the beginning of the test, 30 mg/L of NH3-N was added, and all nitrogen species were measured for 1-2 hours. Inhibitory chemicals were added to isolate nitrifier communities: Chlorate inhibits comammox, and 1-octyne inhibits AOB (Table 1) 6,7,8.9. Initial OUR testing determined the dosage of inhibitory chemicals to add.

Results
Nitrification was well maintained in all phases, with average effluent ammonia concentrations of 0.37 ± 0.71 mg/L at low DO, 0.05 ± 0.02 mg/L at mid DO, and 0.19 ± 0.11 mg/L at high DO. Low liquid phase N2O was usually observed in the reactor but peaks in N2O were observed when DO was outside of the desired operating band for an extended period. Monod curves were fitted for each experiment within each reactor operating phase to determine the KDO and the maximum activity rate. When considering the entire nitrifying community, or when no biomass was inhibited, lower KDO were observed at lower bulk DO conditions (Figure 2). Specifically, for the same test when all microbial community contributions to nitrification are considered, biomass acclimated to low DO had a KDO of 0.25 mg/L, compared to a high DO KDO of 1.21 mg/L, confirming the expectation that nitrifiers in lower DO systems adapt with lower observed KDO values (Table 2).

Initial qPCR results showed that the relative abundance of comammox was the highest at low DO (10.9%), but AOB and canonical NOB remained as the dominant nitrifiers in the system. All qPCR results will be included in the conference presentation. Inhibition testing confirmed lower KDO values for comammox at low and mid DO, demonstrating higher oxygen affinity and enhanced nitrification (Figure 3). Additionally, for all DO operation modes, the CMX KDO is lower than the overall KDO and the nitritation KDO, as well as the maximum growth rate. The CMX KDO for low DO and mid DO sludge ranged from 0.15 to 0.23 mg/L and since the comammox abundance appears to increase with the reduction in DO, the presence of comammox seems to help explain the overall KDO reduction with the low DO sludge1.

Conclusion and Significance Comammox KDO is lower than the AOB KDO at Low and Mid DO conditions, providing a selective advantage for comammox at low DO conditions and enabling nitrification. AOB may not adapt to low DO; however, due to the comammox selection at low DO, nitrification is possible.
This paper was presented at WEFTEC 2025, held September 27-October 1, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
Presentation time
08:40:00
08:50:00
Session time
08:30:00
10:00:00
SessionMicrobial Selection and Performance Under Low DO Conditions
Session locationMcCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois, USA
TopicResearch
TopicResearch
Author(s)
Wittman, Megan, Sturm, Belinda, Hiripitiyage, Yasawantha, Jimenez, Jose, Miller, Mark, Bauhs, Kayla
Author(s)M. Wittman1, B. Sturm1, Y. Hiripitiyage1, J. Jimenez2, M. Miller2, K. Bauhs2
Author affiliation(s)University of Kansas1, Brown and Caldwell2
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep 2025
DOI10.2175/193864718825160108
Volume / Issue
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2025
Word count15

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Wittman, Megan. Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Web. 6 Nov. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-10118842CITANCHOR>.
Wittman, Megan. Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions. Water Environment Federation, 2025. Accessed November 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118842CITANCHOR.
Wittman, Megan
Distinguishing AOB and Comammox Nitrifier Kinetics to Effectively Nitrify at Low Dissolved Oxygen Conditions
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
September 30, 2025
November 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-10118842CITANCHOR