lastID = -277843
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 14:12:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 14:12:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:56:30 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:56:29 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard

How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard

How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
Abstract
Traditional design criteria for keeping mixed liquor in suspension suggest power level requirements in the range of 6 – 8 W/m3 (30 - 40 hp/mil gal). However, published criteria from controlled lab experiments for flocculation of mixed liquor translate to power levels two orders of magnitude lower. This suggests that lower power levels may be feasible for mixing mixed liquor than currently commonly applied. The chemical engineering industry's approach for keeping solids in suspension investigates each impeller individually. This stands in contrast to the wastewater industry, where commonly a minimum power level regardless of mixer type is defined, be it top mounted, submersible, pumped-mix, or other. Limited published data suggests that power levels much below the traditional design criteria (as low as 0.1 - 0.2 W/m3 or 0.5 - 1.0 hp/mil gal) are able to maintain adequate mixing, as indicated by the variation of mixed liquor concentration vertically in an activated sludge tank.Several studies indicate that power levels can be further reduced when different process feed streams are combined before being fed into the mixed zone. Projects that the authors have been involved in confirm that these low power levels are feasible, but not in all applications. This paper discusses six case studies from different full scale facilities to summarize experiences gained with lowering mixing energy to keep suspended solids in suspension or - vice versa - predict under which conditions mixed liquor will settle in anoxic or anaerobic zones, which may be desired to stimulate nutrient removal through mixed liquor in-line fermentation. Future research directed at determining the impact of different MLSS CoV values on biological reaction rates, so that minimum mixing objectives can be defined in relation to the targeted process performance.
Traditional design criteria for keeping mixed liquor in suspension suggest power level requirements in the range of 6 – 8 W/m3 (30 - 40 hp/mil gal). However, published criteria from controlled lab experiments for flocculation of mixed liquor translate to power levels two orders of magnitude lower. This suggests that lower power levels may be feasible for mixing mixed liquor than...
Author(s)
Coenraad PretoriusEd WickleinTanja Rauch-WilliamsRandal SamstagCole Sigmon
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819541710
Volume / Issue2015 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count291

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-277843
Get access
-277843
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
Abstract
Traditional design criteria for keeping mixed liquor in suspension suggest power level requirements in the range of 6 – 8 W/m3 (30 - 40 hp/mil gal). However, published criteria from controlled lab experiments for flocculation of mixed liquor translate to power levels two orders of magnitude lower. This suggests that lower power levels may be feasible for mixing mixed liquor than currently commonly applied. The chemical engineering industry's approach for keeping solids in suspension investigates each impeller individually. This stands in contrast to the wastewater industry, where commonly a minimum power level regardless of mixer type is defined, be it top mounted, submersible, pumped-mix, or other. Limited published data suggests that power levels much below the traditional design criteria (as low as 0.1 - 0.2 W/m3 or 0.5 - 1.0 hp/mil gal) are able to maintain adequate mixing, as indicated by the variation of mixed liquor concentration vertically in an activated sludge tank.Several studies indicate that power levels can be further reduced when different process feed streams are combined before being fed into the mixed zone. Projects that the authors have been involved in confirm that these low power levels are feasible, but not in all applications. This paper discusses six case studies from different full scale facilities to summarize experiences gained with lowering mixing energy to keep suspended solids in suspension or - vice versa - predict under which conditions mixed liquor will settle in anoxic or anaerobic zones, which may be desired to stimulate nutrient removal through mixed liquor in-line fermentation. Future research directed at determining the impact of different MLSS CoV values on biological reaction rates, so that minimum mixing objectives can be defined in relation to the targeted process performance.
Traditional design criteria for keeping mixed liquor in suspension suggest power level requirements in the range of 6 – 8 W/m3 (30 - 40 hp/mil gal). However, published criteria from controlled lab experiments for flocculation of mixed liquor translate to power levels two orders of magnitude lower. This suggests that lower power levels may be feasible for mixing mixed liquor than...
Author(s)
Coenraad PretoriusEd WickleinTanja Rauch-WilliamsRandal SamstagCole Sigmon
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2015
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864715819541710
Volume / Issue2015 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2015
Word count291

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Coenraad Pretorius# Ed Wicklein# Tanja Rauch-Williams# Randal Samstag# Cole Sigmon. How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 22 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-277843CITANCHOR>.
Coenraad Pretorius# Ed Wicklein# Tanja Rauch-Williams# Randal Samstag# Cole Sigmon. How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-277843CITANCHOR.
Coenraad Pretorius# Ed Wicklein# Tanja Rauch-Williams# Randal Samstag# Cole Sigmon
How Oversized Mixers Became an Industry Standard
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 22, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-277843CITANCHOR