lastID = -279276
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT...
Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-23 15:38:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-23 15:38:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 07:03:25 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 07:03:24 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 07:03:23 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT...
Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use

Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use

Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT...
Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use
Abstract
Solids retention time (SRT) is the most important variable in determining the performance of an activated sludge system. Controlling SRT should therefore be one of the most important tasks of plant operators. However, one often finds that operators abandon SRT control in favor of sub-optimal parameters, such as mixed liquor suspended solids concentration or food to micro-organism ratio. Reasons for this relate to the common practice (in North America) to draw waste activated sludge (WAS) from the return activated sludge (RAS) conduit, which has the benefit of reducing the flow of WAS. To calculate the WAS flow for a given target SRT, it is common to use the ratio of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) to RAS total suspended solids (TSS) concentration. Unfortunately, the RAS TSS concentration can vary significantly from day-to-day, resulting in highly variable WAS flow estimates. Using averaging to reduce variability adds significant lag to the control loop and typically achieves limited success.Three different strategies for overcoming this problem are discussed: (1) wasting mixed liquor, (2) using probes to continuously track MLSS and RAS TSS and (3) using a different calculation procedure which reduces daily variability significantly. The first has the benefit of providing simple, but accurate control, at the expense of increased WAS flow. The second allows for automation with the associated risk of probe failure. The third strategy can be implemented at most plants without changing the source for wasting or installing probes, but it does require accurate influent and RAS flow metering. All three strategies have been successfully employed to provide stable SRT control and improve secondary treatment performance while simplifying operation.
Solids retention time (SRT) is the most important variable in determining the performance of an activated sludge system. Controlling SRT should therefore be one of the most important tasks of plant operators. However, one often finds that operators abandon SRT control in favor of sub-optimal parameters, such as mixed liquor suspended solids concentration or food to micro-organism ratio. Reasons...
Author(s)
Coenraad PretoriusRon AppletonSteve WalkerErik JorgensenBryan StevensonLarry Bateman
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2016
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864716819715130
Volume / Issue2016 / 6
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2016
Word count293

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT...
Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-279276
Get access
-279276
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT...
Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use
Abstract
Solids retention time (SRT) is the most important variable in determining the performance of an activated sludge system. Controlling SRT should therefore be one of the most important tasks of plant operators. However, one often finds that operators abandon SRT control in favor of sub-optimal parameters, such as mixed liquor suspended solids concentration or food to micro-organism ratio. Reasons for this relate to the common practice (in North America) to draw waste activated sludge (WAS) from the return activated sludge (RAS) conduit, which has the benefit of reducing the flow of WAS. To calculate the WAS flow for a given target SRT, it is common to use the ratio of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) to RAS total suspended solids (TSS) concentration. Unfortunately, the RAS TSS concentration can vary significantly from day-to-day, resulting in highly variable WAS flow estimates. Using averaging to reduce variability adds significant lag to the control loop and typically achieves limited success.Three different strategies for overcoming this problem are discussed: (1) wasting mixed liquor, (2) using probes to continuously track MLSS and RAS TSS and (3) using a different calculation procedure which reduces daily variability significantly. The first has the benefit of providing simple, but accurate control, at the expense of increased WAS flow. The second allows for automation with the associated risk of probe failure. The third strategy can be implemented at most plants without changing the source for wasting or installing probes, but it does require accurate influent and RAS flow metering. All three strategies have been successfully employed to provide stable SRT control and improve secondary treatment performance while simplifying operation.
Solids retention time (SRT) is the most important variable in determining the performance of an activated sludge system. Controlling SRT should therefore be one of the most important tasks of plant operators. However, one often finds that operators abandon SRT control in favor of sub-optimal parameters, such as mixed liquor suspended solids concentration or food to micro-organism ratio. Reasons...
Author(s)
Coenraad PretoriusRon AppletonSteve WalkerErik JorgensenBryan StevensonLarry Bateman
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2016
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864716819715130
Volume / Issue2016 / 6
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2016
Word count293

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Coenraad Pretorius# Ron Appleton# Steve Walker# Erik Jorgensen# Bryan Stevenson# Larry Bateman. Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-279276CITANCHOR>.
Coenraad Pretorius# Ron Appleton# Steve Walker# Erik Jorgensen# Bryan Stevenson# Larry Bateman. Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-279276CITANCHOR.
Coenraad Pretorius# Ron Appleton# Steve Walker# Erik Jorgensen# Bryan Stevenson# Larry Bateman
Why SRT Control Is Not More Widely Practiced and Three Ways to Fix It: Making SRT Control a Reliable Tool for Operators to Use
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-279276CITANCHOR