This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Two-Stage Thermal oxidization: A Cost-Effective, Environmentally Sound Alternative...
Two-Stage Thermal oxidization: A Cost-Effective, Environmentally Sound Alternative for BioEnergy Recovery from Multiple Hearth Furnaces
Abstract
Incineration or Thermal Oxidization of wastewater biosolids is a proven, cost-effective, and environmentally sound practice. Air pollution control device technology is available to comply with US EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts LLLL and MMMM, and 40 CFR Part 62, Subpart LLL, commonly referred to as the SSI Rule.This paper will discuss an overview of biological and thermal bioenergy recovery potentials and pathways. The focus of the paper is energy recovery from a Multiple Hearth Furnace (MHF) based thermal oxidization system at the Delaware Regional Water quality Control Authority (DELCORA), Chester, PA. Operational results from this recent MHF bioenergy recovery project are included.
Incineration or Thermal Oxidization of wastewater biosolids is a proven, cost-effective, and environmentally sound practice. Air pollution control device technology is available to comply with US EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts LLLL and MMMM, and 40 CFR Part 62, Subpart LLL, commonly referred to as the SSI Rule.
Author(s)
Stanley J ChilsonWilliam Karch
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectResearch Article
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2017
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864717822158242
Volume / Issue2017 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2017
Word count119

Purchase price $11.50

Get access