lastID = -280473
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W12-Proceedings
Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 00:58:19 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 00:58:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:30:43 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:30:42 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W12-Proceedings
Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint

Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint

Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W12-Proceedings
Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint
Abstract
Highly populated cities are expanding geographically to form satellite cities remote from the central urban area. This poses new sanitation problems, such as supplying recycled water, expansion of sewers and central wastewater treatment facilities. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems are being proposed as a solution to this scenario (Massoud et al., 2009). In this study, we utilize a hypothetical but realistic example of Hollywood to analyze the practicability of developing a decentralized system, as an alternative to using centralized facilities. We compared these two alternatives based on numerical analyses of pump-back power consumption for recycled water, sewer expansion cost and the construction cost for expansion of central treatment plant facilities. Pump-back power consumption for this case can amount to approximately 80% of the wastewater treatment power consumption. In this case study, installing decentralized treatment systems proved to be far more economical than relying on central treatment facilities.
Highly populated cities are expanding geographically to form satellite cities remote from the central urban area. This poses new sanitation problems, such as supplying recycled water, expansion of sewers and central wastewater treatment facilities. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems are being proposed as a solution to this scenario (Massoud et al., 2009). In this study, we utilize a...
Author(s)
Kartiki S. NaikMichael K. Stenstrom
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811726699
Volume / Issue2012 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2012
Word count157

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W12-Proceedings
Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-280473
Get access
-280473
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W12-Proceedings
Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint
Abstract
Highly populated cities are expanding geographically to form satellite cities remote from the central urban area. This poses new sanitation problems, such as supplying recycled water, expansion of sewers and central wastewater treatment facilities. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems are being proposed as a solution to this scenario (Massoud et al., 2009). In this study, we utilize a hypothetical but realistic example of Hollywood to analyze the practicability of developing a decentralized system, as an alternative to using centralized facilities. We compared these two alternatives based on numerical analyses of pump-back power consumption for recycled water, sewer expansion cost and the construction cost for expansion of central treatment plant facilities. Pump-back power consumption for this case can amount to approximately 80% of the wastewater treatment power consumption. In this case study, installing decentralized treatment systems proved to be far more economical than relying on central treatment facilities.
Highly populated cities are expanding geographically to form satellite cities remote from the central urban area. This poses new sanitation problems, such as supplying recycled water, expansion of sewers and central wastewater treatment facilities. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems are being proposed as a solution to this scenario (Massoud et al., 2009). In this study, we utilize a...
Author(s)
Kartiki S. NaikMichael K. Stenstrom
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Sep, 2012
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864712811726699
Volume / Issue2012 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2012
Word count157

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Kartiki S. Naik# Michael K. Stenstrom. Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 26 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-280473CITANCHOR>.
Kartiki S. Naik# Michael K. Stenstrom. Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 26, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280473CITANCHOR.
Kartiki S. Naik# Michael K. Stenstrom
Cost and Energy Incentives for Decentralized Treatment - Reclamation and Footprint
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 26, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-280473CITANCHOR