lastID = -281592
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W13-Proceedings
A Pinch or a Dash
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 01:14:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:14:32 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 18:58:18 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:58:17 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W13-Proceedings
A Pinch or a Dash

A Pinch or a Dash

A Pinch or a Dash

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W13-Proceedings
A Pinch or a Dash
Abstract
Utilities traditionally have used anaerobic digestion to treat the biosolids generated from wastewater treatment. However, in recent years this practice has expanded to include codigestion of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) and other food processing wastes (High Strength Wastes-HSW). Utilities interested in high strength waste (food processing, ethanol production wastestreams, biodiesel production wastestreams and many others) must also adopt to a commodity market where the availability of HSW is subject to competition from other utilities, production schedules, the impacts of the global oil market and agricultural commodity prices (corn, oils, etc). All of these factors must be incorporated into a business case evaluation to avoid investing capital into facilities that may be underutilized due to forces outside the control of a utility. The mindset for evaluating this approach must be adjusted from the norm, where all parties are willing (or required) to send wastewater to the POTW to one where wastes must be recruited and the services of the POTW marketed to potential waste producers.This paper will utilize the results of multiple business case evaluations, laboratory testing and full scale digestion results to explore the challenges of planning and implementing a co-digestion program. The paper will focus on the multiple paths to achieving increased gas production while accounting for the costs associated with HSW collection, pre-processing and post digestion treatment. Multiple project examples will demonstrate the value in a diverse HSW recruiting program with multiple feedstocks for co-digestion.Several case studies have conducted analysis of various HSWs to determine key characteristics including solids content, COD, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Content and Volatile Solids. These values in conjunction with biological methane potential testing and published values have been utilized to determine the potential for gas production from HSW. With this evaluation it has been possible to determine the volume and mass of feedstock necessary to increase gas production in mesophilic anaerobic digesters. Table 1 summarizes the multiple paths a POTW may take in order to provide sufficient feedstock to achieve a 9 MM BTU/Hr digester gas production rate from HSW.As the table demonstrates there are numerous approaches to achieving the necessary digester loading and the characteristics of the HSW are critical to the volume of waste necessary. As the protein and fat content of a HSW increases the potential digester gas production from those feedstocks increases. Those feedstocks that are primarily carbohydrate based have both a lower volume of digester gas produced per unit of COD and a lower methane % in the digester gas. In addition, the solids content of the organic waste directly impacts the volume of waste necessary and therefore the impact on both the digester volume that is utilized but also the volume of liquid that must be maintained at mesophilic temperatures within the digesters.The characterization of the waste may then be incorporated into a digester modeling tool to determine the mass of solids remaining after digestion and the mass of nitrogen and phosphorus that are released into the bulk liquid of the digester. As part of multiple case studies the costs associated with dewatering, residuals hauling and ultimate disposal are applied to the remaining solids produced as part of co-digestion. The costs associated with treating dewatering recycle streams including nitrification, denitrification and P removal have also been determined and incorporated into the model. With these costs and the value of the digester gas, either for heat, electricity production or as a natural gas equivalent, the modeling determines the minimum tipping fee (if any) that is necessary to offset the costs of treatment based on the value of the biogas. This tool has demonstrated that certain waste streams have greater value even though they have a lower energy density due to lower overall treatment costs.The final piece of the evaluation relates to outside competition for wastestreams. As digesters are best operated in a consistent manner, the reliability of a wastestream is part of the value of the product. In our case studies the variability and reliability of thin stillage from ethanol manufacturing has reduced the value of the product for co-digestion as the availability of the product is a function of the ethanol manufacturing market. Therefore, it is very difficult to maintain a consistent loading to digesters as the supply of thin stillage varies from feast to famine.This paper will present the tools utilized to determine the value of various HSWs and present successful mixes of products to increase digester gas production.
Utilities traditionally have used anaerobic digestion to treat the biosolids generated from wastewater treatment. However, in recent years this practice has expanded to include codigestion of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) and other food processing wastes (High Strength Wastes-HSW). Utilities interested in high strength waste (food processing, ethanol production wastestreams, biodiesel production...
Author(s)
Robert F. WimmerYinan Qi
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2013
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864713813668033
Volume / Issue2013 / 18
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2013
Word count744

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Pinch or a Dash'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W13-Proceedings
A Pinch or a Dash
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-281592
Get access
-281592
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Pinch or a Dash'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W13-Proceedings
A Pinch or a Dash
Abstract
Utilities traditionally have used anaerobic digestion to treat the biosolids generated from wastewater treatment. However, in recent years this practice has expanded to include codigestion of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) and other food processing wastes (High Strength Wastes-HSW). Utilities interested in high strength waste (food processing, ethanol production wastestreams, biodiesel production wastestreams and many others) must also adopt to a commodity market where the availability of HSW is subject to competition from other utilities, production schedules, the impacts of the global oil market and agricultural commodity prices (corn, oils, etc). All of these factors must be incorporated into a business case evaluation to avoid investing capital into facilities that may be underutilized due to forces outside the control of a utility. The mindset for evaluating this approach must be adjusted from the norm, where all parties are willing (or required) to send wastewater to the POTW to one where wastes must be recruited and the services of the POTW marketed to potential waste producers.This paper will utilize the results of multiple business case evaluations, laboratory testing and full scale digestion results to explore the challenges of planning and implementing a co-digestion program. The paper will focus on the multiple paths to achieving increased gas production while accounting for the costs associated with HSW collection, pre-processing and post digestion treatment. Multiple project examples will demonstrate the value in a diverse HSW recruiting program with multiple feedstocks for co-digestion.Several case studies have conducted analysis of various HSWs to determine key characteristics including solids content, COD, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Content and Volatile Solids. These values in conjunction with biological methane potential testing and published values have been utilized to determine the potential for gas production from HSW. With this evaluation it has been possible to determine the volume and mass of feedstock necessary to increase gas production in mesophilic anaerobic digesters. Table 1 summarizes the multiple paths a POTW may take in order to provide sufficient feedstock to achieve a 9 MM BTU/Hr digester gas production rate from HSW.As the table demonstrates there are numerous approaches to achieving the necessary digester loading and the characteristics of the HSW are critical to the volume of waste necessary. As the protein and fat content of a HSW increases the potential digester gas production from those feedstocks increases. Those feedstocks that are primarily carbohydrate based have both a lower volume of digester gas produced per unit of COD and a lower methane % in the digester gas. In addition, the solids content of the organic waste directly impacts the volume of waste necessary and therefore the impact on both the digester volume that is utilized but also the volume of liquid that must be maintained at mesophilic temperatures within the digesters.The characterization of the waste may then be incorporated into a digester modeling tool to determine the mass of solids remaining after digestion and the mass of nitrogen and phosphorus that are released into the bulk liquid of the digester. As part of multiple case studies the costs associated with dewatering, residuals hauling and ultimate disposal are applied to the remaining solids produced as part of co-digestion. The costs associated with treating dewatering recycle streams including nitrification, denitrification and P removal have also been determined and incorporated into the model. With these costs and the value of the digester gas, either for heat, electricity production or as a natural gas equivalent, the modeling determines the minimum tipping fee (if any) that is necessary to offset the costs of treatment based on the value of the biogas. This tool has demonstrated that certain waste streams have greater value even though they have a lower energy density due to lower overall treatment costs.The final piece of the evaluation relates to outside competition for wastestreams. As digesters are best operated in a consistent manner, the reliability of a wastestream is part of the value of the product. In our case studies the variability and reliability of thin stillage from ethanol manufacturing has reduced the value of the product for co-digestion as the availability of the product is a function of the ethanol manufacturing market. Therefore, it is very difficult to maintain a consistent loading to digesters as the supply of thin stillage varies from feast to famine.This paper will present the tools utilized to determine the value of various HSWs and present successful mixes of products to increase digester gas production.
Utilities traditionally have used anaerobic digestion to treat the biosolids generated from wastewater treatment. However, in recent years this practice has expanded to include codigestion of fats, oils, and grease (FOG) and other food processing wastes (High Strength Wastes-HSW). Utilities interested in high strength waste (food processing, ethanol production wastestreams, biodiesel production...
Author(s)
Robert F. WimmerYinan Qi
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2013
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864713813668033
Volume / Issue2013 / 18
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2013
Word count744

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Robert F. Wimmer# Yinan Qi. A Pinch or a Dash. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-281592CITANCHOR>.
Robert F. Wimmer# Yinan Qi. A Pinch or a Dash. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-281592CITANCHOR.
Robert F. Wimmer# Yinan Qi
A Pinch or a Dash
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-281592CITANCHOR