lastID = -282141
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
UMC Proceedings 2014.png
Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 19:57:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 19:57:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 21:02:20 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 17:15:50 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 17:15:49 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 02:16:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:57:52 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:57:51 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
UMC Proceedings 2014.png
Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model

Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model

Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

UMC Proceedings 2014.png
Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model
Abstract
Seattle Public Utilities’ Cedar Treatment Facility and San Diego County Water Authority’s Twin Oaks Valley Water Treatment Plant have both been delivered using a Design-Build-Operate contracting approach. The Cedar and Twin Oaks projects went into operations in 2004 and 2008, respectively. Owners using this approach typically believe that by allowing a DBO contractor to innovate in the combined design, permitting, construction, and operations by customizing the design and construction of the facility to achieve its unique performance requirements and water quality expectations, the designer-builder-operator will maximize efficiency, resulting in lower construction and long term operations costs, and improved schedule and reliability. This paper will review each project’s initial objectives and assess results to date to determine whether desired outcomes have been achieved. While every DBO project is different, there tend to be similar reasons for owners to select a DBO model, and at a high level, similar risk allocations among projects. The Cedar DBO project was modeled after Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) Tolt Treatment Facility DBO project, which began operations three years prior to the Cedar DBO project. Many aspects of the Twin Oaks Project were modeled after the Tolt and Cedar DBO projects. Each of these projects has been the subject of industry observers interested in understanding whether the DBO model can consistently deliver results equal to or superior to conventional public works contracting or other alternative contracting approaches. Lessons have been learned, and in general, improvements have been made in each subsequent implementation of these DBO models, and those closely involved in the projects discussed in this paper can conceive of further evolution of the model - public-private partnerships for which risks and incentives are optimally placed in all phases of the projects. While this is the intent for any DBO project, we find that the further we get into the long term operations and maintenance phase, the more likely that the contracts can be further improved based on the unique challenges of the operations and maintenance phase.
Seattle Public Utilities’ Cedar Treatment Facility and San Diego County Water Authority’s Twin Oaks Valley Water Treatment Plant have both been delivered using a Design-Build-Operate contracting approach. The Cedar and Twin Oaks projects went into operations in 2004 and 2008, respectively. Owners using this approach typically believe that by allowing a DBO contractor to innovate in the...
Author(s)
Elizabeth S. KellyDavid J. HilmoeRobert KutaTim Suydam
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714816100344
Volume / Issue2014 / 1
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
Copyright2014
Word count351

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
UMC Proceedings 2014.png
Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282141
Get access
-282141
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

UMC Proceedings 2014.png
Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model
Abstract
Seattle Public Utilities’ Cedar Treatment Facility and San Diego County Water Authority’s Twin Oaks Valley Water Treatment Plant have both been delivered using a Design-Build-Operate contracting approach. The Cedar and Twin Oaks projects went into operations in 2004 and 2008, respectively. Owners using this approach typically believe that by allowing a DBO contractor to innovate in the combined design, permitting, construction, and operations by customizing the design and construction of the facility to achieve its unique performance requirements and water quality expectations, the designer-builder-operator will maximize efficiency, resulting in lower construction and long term operations costs, and improved schedule and reliability. This paper will review each project’s initial objectives and assess results to date to determine whether desired outcomes have been achieved. While every DBO project is different, there tend to be similar reasons for owners to select a DBO model, and at a high level, similar risk allocations among projects. The Cedar DBO project was modeled after Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) Tolt Treatment Facility DBO project, which began operations three years prior to the Cedar DBO project. Many aspects of the Twin Oaks Project were modeled after the Tolt and Cedar DBO projects. Each of these projects has been the subject of industry observers interested in understanding whether the DBO model can consistently deliver results equal to or superior to conventional public works contracting or other alternative contracting approaches. Lessons have been learned, and in general, improvements have been made in each subsequent implementation of these DBO models, and those closely involved in the projects discussed in this paper can conceive of further evolution of the model - public-private partnerships for which risks and incentives are optimally placed in all phases of the projects. While this is the intent for any DBO project, we find that the further we get into the long term operations and maintenance phase, the more likely that the contracts can be further improved based on the unique challenges of the operations and maintenance phase.
Seattle Public Utilities’ Cedar Treatment Facility and San Diego County Water Authority’s Twin Oaks Valley Water Treatment Plant have both been delivered using a Design-Build-Operate contracting approach. The Cedar and Twin Oaks projects went into operations in 2004 and 2008, respectively. Owners using this approach typically believe that by allowing a DBO contractor to innovate in the...
Author(s)
Elizabeth S. KellyDavid J. HilmoeRobert KutaTim Suydam
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714816100344
Volume / Issue2014 / 1
Content sourceUtility Management Conference
Copyright2014
Word count351

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Elizabeth S. Kelly# David J. Hilmoe# Robert Kuta# Tim Suydam. Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 25 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282141CITANCHOR>.
Elizabeth S. Kelly# David J. Hilmoe# Robert Kuta# Tim Suydam. Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed August 25, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282141CITANCHOR.
Elizabeth S. Kelly# David J. Hilmoe# Robert Kuta# Tim Suydam
Assessments of Two Major DBO Projects Part Way into Their Operations Phases and Consideration of Enhancements to the DBO Contracting Model
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
August 25, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282141CITANCHOR