lastID = -282558
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development...
One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:20:25 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 15:20:24 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 23:46:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:57:46 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-30 20:57:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 16:47:50 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 16:47:49 Katherine Saltzman
  • 2020-03-27 01:19:20 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 02:20:33 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:20:32 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:20:31 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development...
One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations

One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations

One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development...
One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations
Abstract
The ANITA™ Mox Process is a single-stage deammonification process utilizing moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology. Early studies indicated that the Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) configuration was an effective approach to improve ANITA™ Mox performance. Two studies on ANITA™ Mox IFAS were conducted at full-scale and pilot-scale levels. The full-scale study compared the IFAS and MBBR configurations side-by-side in 50-m3 reactors. The second study was a pilot study on the IFAS configuration conducted in the U.S.A. Both studies investigated the nitrogen removal performance and sludge settleability under optimized operating conditions.The two studies confirmed that the nitrogen removal rate in the IFAS configuration was 2 to 2.5 times higher than that in the MBBR configuration with similar or better ammonia and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiencies. The operating conditions for the IFAS are typically 2.5-5.0 g/L of MLSS and 0.3-0.8 mg/L of DO. The sludge settleabilty from both IFAS studies was good, as indicated by SVIs between 70 to 100 mL/g. The clarifier was able to retain the suspended biomass required for the better performance, even though the effluent TSS was relatively high (100 to 500 mg/L) and mostly dependent on the incoming reject water TSS spikes. Based on the experimental results, the suitability of MBBR and IFAS configurations for full-scale applications was discussed.
The ANITA™ Mox Process is a single-stage deammonification process utilizing moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology. Early studies indicated that the Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) configuration was an effective approach to improve ANITA™ Mox performance. Two studies on ANITA™ Mox IFAS were conducted at full-scale...
Author(s)
Hong ZhaoJustin BellGlenn ThesingSimon PiveteauMagnus ChristenssonFrederic VeuilletJuan OchoaRomain Lemaire
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714816196592
Volume / Issue2014 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2014
Word count230

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development...
One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282558
Get access
-282558
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development...
One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations
Abstract
The ANITA™ Mox Process is a single-stage deammonification process utilizing moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology. Early studies indicated that the Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) configuration was an effective approach to improve ANITA™ Mox performance. Two studies on ANITA™ Mox IFAS were conducted at full-scale and pilot-scale levels. The full-scale study compared the IFAS and MBBR configurations side-by-side in 50-m3 reactors. The second study was a pilot study on the IFAS configuration conducted in the U.S.A. Both studies investigated the nitrogen removal performance and sludge settleability under optimized operating conditions.The two studies confirmed that the nitrogen removal rate in the IFAS configuration was 2 to 2.5 times higher than that in the MBBR configuration with similar or better ammonia and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiencies. The operating conditions for the IFAS are typically 2.5-5.0 g/L of MLSS and 0.3-0.8 mg/L of DO. The sludge settleabilty from both IFAS studies was good, as indicated by SVIs between 70 to 100 mL/g. The clarifier was able to retain the suspended biomass required for the better performance, even though the effluent TSS was relatively high (100 to 500 mg/L) and mostly dependent on the incoming reject water TSS spikes. Based on the experimental results, the suitability of MBBR and IFAS configurations for full-scale applications was discussed.
The ANITA™ Mox Process is a single-stage deammonification process utilizing moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) technology. Early studies indicated that the Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) configuration was an effective approach to improve ANITA™ Mox performance. Two studies on ANITA™ Mox IFAS were conducted at full-scale...
Author(s)
Hong ZhaoJustin BellGlenn ThesingSimon PiveteauMagnus ChristenssonFrederic VeuilletJuan OchoaRomain Lemaire
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date May, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714816196592
Volume / Issue2014 / 2
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
Copyright2014
Word count230

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Hong Zhao# Justin Bell# Glenn Thesing# Simon Piveteau# Magnus Christensson# Frederic Veuillet# Juan Ochoa# Romain Lemaire. One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 25 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282558CITANCHOR>.
Hong Zhao# Justin Bell# Glenn Thesing# Simon Piveteau# Magnus Christensson# Frederic Veuillet# Juan Ochoa# Romain Lemaire. One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 25, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282558CITANCHOR.
Hong Zhao# Justin Bell# Glenn Thesing# Simon Piveteau# Magnus Christensson# Frederic Veuillet# Juan Ochoa# Romain Lemaire
One-Stage Deammonification Process - MBBR Versus IFAS Configurations - Development Updates and Application Considerations
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 25, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282558CITANCHOR