lastID = -282887
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: W14-Proceedings
Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-31 01:53:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-31 01:53:33 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:51:17 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:51:16 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: W14-Proceedings
Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process

Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process

Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: W14-Proceedings
Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process
Abstract
Attached growth systems have biomass attached to media and are retained as opposed to being in suspension and be recycled; MBBR and IFAS are two of the examples of attached growth systems. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) are innovative technology but are relatively new for United States. These are currently being used at few wastewater treatment plants in the country. MBBR system was designed and installed at 67-mgd Noman M. Cole, Jr. Pollution Control Plant (NMCPCP) located in the Chesapeake bay watershed to achieve a total nitrogen (TN) effluent concentration of 3.0 mg/L. MBBR was selected for use at this plant as a final polishing step. The plant provides BNR (Biological Nutrient Removal) before the MBBR process. At this plant, MBBRs remove nitrate (NO3-N) in an anoxic environment using supplemental carbon (methanol or analternative). The technology was demonstrated and met the effluent requirement on a pilot-scale test carried out at this plant before it was selected as a viable alternative for ENR (Enhanced Nutrient Removal). The MBBR process has been operating successfully since summer 2013 and is achieving the TN effluent goal. As is common with new and innovative technologies, there were several issues and challenges that were overcome during the construction, equipment startup, biological startup and full-scale operation. The paper presents the process and performance testing, challenges and lessons learned during the startup, and approximately one year of operation of the MBBR.
Attached growth systems have biomass attached to media and are retained as opposed to being in suspension and be recycled; MBBR and IFAS are two of the examples of attached growth systems. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) are innovative technology but are relatively new for United States. These are currently being used at few wastewater treatment plants in the country. MBBR system was designed...
Author(s)
Dilli NeupaneRoger SilverioChuck LongerbeamSarah MotschMike McGrathJohn McGettiganPatrick EuDalyLouis OrtenzioDavid FosterHong Zhao
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815941117
Volume / Issue2014 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count243

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: W14-Proceedings
Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-282887
Get access
-282887
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: W14-Proceedings
Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process
Abstract
Attached growth systems have biomass attached to media and are retained as opposed to being in suspension and be recycled; MBBR and IFAS are two of the examples of attached growth systems. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) are innovative technology but are relatively new for United States. These are currently being used at few wastewater treatment plants in the country. MBBR system was designed and installed at 67-mgd Noman M. Cole, Jr. Pollution Control Plant (NMCPCP) located in the Chesapeake bay watershed to achieve a total nitrogen (TN) effluent concentration of 3.0 mg/L. MBBR was selected for use at this plant as a final polishing step. The plant provides BNR (Biological Nutrient Removal) before the MBBR process. At this plant, MBBRs remove nitrate (NO3-N) in an anoxic environment using supplemental carbon (methanol or analternative). The technology was demonstrated and met the effluent requirement on a pilot-scale test carried out at this plant before it was selected as a viable alternative for ENR (Enhanced Nutrient Removal). The MBBR process has been operating successfully since summer 2013 and is achieving the TN effluent goal. As is common with new and innovative technologies, there were several issues and challenges that were overcome during the construction, equipment startup, biological startup and full-scale operation. The paper presents the process and performance testing, challenges and lessons learned during the startup, and approximately one year of operation of the MBBR.
Attached growth systems have biomass attached to media and are retained as opposed to being in suspension and be recycled; MBBR and IFAS are two of the examples of attached growth systems. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) are innovative technology but are relatively new for United States. These are currently being used at few wastewater treatment plants in the country. MBBR system was designed...
Author(s)
Dilli NeupaneRoger SilverioChuck LongerbeamSarah MotschMike McGrathJohn McGettiganPatrick EuDalyLouis OrtenzioDavid FosterHong Zhao
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2014
ISSN1938-6478
DOI10.2175/193864714815941117
Volume / Issue2014 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
Copyright2014
Word count243

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Dilli Neupane# Roger Silverio# Chuck Longerbeam# Sarah Motsch# Mike McGrath# John McGettigan# Patrick EuDaly# Louis Ortenzio# David Foster# Hong Zhao. Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-282887CITANCHOR>.
Dilli Neupane# Roger Silverio# Chuck Longerbeam# Sarah Motsch# Mike McGrath# John McGettigan# Patrick EuDaly# Louis Ortenzio# David Foster# Hong Zhao. Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282887CITANCHOR.
Dilli Neupane# Roger Silverio# Chuck Longerbeam# Sarah Motsch# Mike McGrath# John McGettigan# Patrick EuDaly# Louis Ortenzio# David Foster# Hong Zhao
Challenges in Starting up and Operating Attached Growth Denitrifying Process
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-282887CITANCHOR