lastID = -286865
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 21:09:13 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:12 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
Abstract
Key requirements for the success of any bioremediation process are complete detoxification of the contaminant, high removal efficiencies, and process stability. Inadequate control and lack of stability over the microorganisms under specific environmental conditions have been limiting factors for long-term implementation of in situ bioremedian processes.This investigation proposed and examined an innovative combination of two technical concepts that currently have strong market potential for groundwater remediation: in-situ bioremediation and permeable barrier for subsurface groundwater confinement/cleanup. Biological Permeable Barrier (BPB) entails immobilizing microbial organisms, which are acclimated to the target contaminants in unique polymeric beads (PVA, polyvinyl alcohol) or on Granular Activated Carbon (GAC). Ideally, a cost-effective permeable reactive medium should be easy to construct and maintain, remain permeable, and tolerate operational and environmental stresses.A series of column experiments were designed to simulate BPB and to account for any significant changes in removal efficiency of 2,4,6 Trichlorophenol (TCP) from groundwater due to hydraulic retention time (HRT), applied loading, availability of dissolved oxygen (DO), and toxic shock loads of TCP. The results of this laboratory investigation provided the basis for the conceptual design and cost evaluation for a contaminated site with PAH's and BTEX in Louisiana.PVA-immobilized cells were found to be a good permeable barrier media with a 100%-91% TCP removal efficiency at loading up to 300-600 mg/L.d, respectively. The mixture of GAC-immobilized cells (3%) and silica sand (97%) offered 100 % removal for TCP loading up to 1200 mg/L.d (HRT= 14.8 minutes) by a combination of biological and physical adsorption mechanisms. Both media tolerated shock loads of TCP (>550 mg/L) and deficiency of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) of less than 2 mg/L and resume their biodegradation activity in a matter of few days. It was determined that BPB offers a passive and low cost bioremediation process that can be strategically designed to remove contaminants from groundwater in situ. The cost of BPB was determined to be substantially less than any other treatment technology for in situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater.
Key requirements for the success of any bioremediation process are complete detoxification of the contaminant, high removal efficiencies, and process stability. Inadequate control and lack of stability over the microorganisms under specific environmental conditions have been limiting factors for long-term implementation of in situ bioremedian processes.This investigation proposed and examined an...
Author(s)
Fatemeh Razavi-Shirazi
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 43 - Remediation of Soil and Groundwater Symposium: In Situ Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:10L.298;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700784545207
Volume / Issue2000 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)298 - 313
Copyright2000
Word count346

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-286865
Get access
-286865
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
Abstract
Key requirements for the success of any bioremediation process are complete detoxification of the contaminant, high removal efficiencies, and process stability. Inadequate control and lack of stability over the microorganisms under specific environmental conditions have been limiting factors for long-term implementation of in situ bioremedian processes.This investigation proposed and examined an innovative combination of two technical concepts that currently have strong market potential for groundwater remediation: in-situ bioremediation and permeable barrier for subsurface groundwater confinement/cleanup. Biological Permeable Barrier (BPB) entails immobilizing microbial organisms, which are acclimated to the target contaminants in unique polymeric beads (PVA, polyvinyl alcohol) or on Granular Activated Carbon (GAC). Ideally, a cost-effective permeable reactive medium should be easy to construct and maintain, remain permeable, and tolerate operational and environmental stresses.A series of column experiments were designed to simulate BPB and to account for any significant changes in removal efficiency of 2,4,6 Trichlorophenol (TCP) from groundwater due to hydraulic retention time (HRT), applied loading, availability of dissolved oxygen (DO), and toxic shock loads of TCP. The results of this laboratory investigation provided the basis for the conceptual design and cost evaluation for a contaminated site with PAH's and BTEX in Louisiana.PVA-immobilized cells were found to be a good permeable barrier media with a 100%-91% TCP removal efficiency at loading up to 300-600 mg/L.d, respectively. The mixture of GAC-immobilized cells (3%) and silica sand (97%) offered 100 % removal for TCP loading up to 1200 mg/L.d (HRT= 14.8 minutes) by a combination of biological and physical adsorption mechanisms. Both media tolerated shock loads of TCP (>550 mg/L) and deficiency of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) of less than 2 mg/L and resume their biodegradation activity in a matter of few days. It was determined that BPB offers a passive and low cost bioremediation process that can be strategically designed to remove contaminants from groundwater in situ. The cost of BPB was determined to be substantially less than any other treatment technology for in situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater.
Key requirements for the success of any bioremediation process are complete detoxification of the contaminant, high removal efficiencies, and process stability. Inadequate control and lack of stability over the microorganisms under specific environmental conditions have been limiting factors for long-term implementation of in situ bioremedian processes.This investigation proposed and examined an...
Author(s)
Fatemeh Razavi-Shirazi
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 43 - Remediation of Soil and Groundwater Symposium: In Situ Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:10L.298;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700784545207
Volume / Issue2000 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)298 - 313
Copyright2000
Word count346

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Fatemeh Razavi-Shirazi. COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 12 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-286865CITANCHOR>.
Fatemeh Razavi-Shirazi. COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 12, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-286865CITANCHOR.
Fatemeh Razavi-Shirazi
COMPARATIVE COST AND PERFORMANCE OF TWO NEW BIOLOGICAL PERMEABLE BARRIERS FOR IN SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 12, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-286865CITANCHOR