lastID = -286985
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:31:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:31:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:24 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:23 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the relative merits of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of municipal sludge in terms of polymeric conversion efficiency, process kinetics, gas productivity, and effluent quality. High-rate digestion experiments were conducted with primaryactivated sludge mixtures at 35° and 55°C at HRTs of 15, 7, and 3 days. The thermophilic cultures were developed by raising the temperature of the mesophilic inoculum to 55°C in one step. The thermophilic runs exhibited higher gas production rate, and gas and methane yields at all HRTs and loading rates of 2.1 - 7.3 kg VS/m3-day. Thermophilic effluents had higher pHs (7.5), alkalinities, and ammonia-nitrogen and VFA concentrations than mesophilic effluents under all operating conditions. The thermophilic process effected higher lipid conversion but lower carbohydrate reduction than the mesophilic process at all HRTs. However, total volatile solids reductions under thermophilic temperature were higher than those under mesophilic conditions at all test HRTs. Thermophilic effluents had much higher concentrations of ammonianitrogen, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, isovalerate, and caproate than mesophilic effluents. These compounds were responsible, in part, for the thermophilic effluent being more odoriferous than the mesophilic effluent. Thermophilic acetogens and methanogens had higher μmax (maximum specific growth rates) and Ks (half-velocity constants) than mesophilic acetogens and methanogens. The higher Ks values explain the occurrence of C3 and higher fatty acids in higher concentrations in thermophilic effluents. Except for the slightly more odor, thermophilic digestion was superior to mesophilic digestion in all respects.
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the relative merits of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of municipal sludge in terms of polymeric conversion efficiency, process kinetics, gas productivity, and effluent quality. High-rate digestion experiments were conducted with primaryactivated sludge mixtures at 35° and 55°C at HRTs of 15, 7, and 3 days. The thermophilic cultures were...
Author(s)
Sam Ghosh
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 40 - Residuals and Biosolids Management Symposium: Biosolids Digestion Innovations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:11L.905;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700784544578
Volume / Issue2000 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)905 - 923
Copyright2000
Word count252

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-286985
Get access
-286985
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the relative merits of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of municipal sludge in terms of polymeric conversion efficiency, process kinetics, gas productivity, and effluent quality. High-rate digestion experiments were conducted with primaryactivated sludge mixtures at 35° and 55°C at HRTs of 15, 7, and 3 days. The thermophilic cultures were developed by raising the temperature of the mesophilic inoculum to 55°C in one step. The thermophilic runs exhibited higher gas production rate, and gas and methane yields at all HRTs and loading rates of 2.1 - 7.3 kg VS/m3-day. Thermophilic effluents had higher pHs (7.5), alkalinities, and ammonia-nitrogen and VFA concentrations than mesophilic effluents under all operating conditions. The thermophilic process effected higher lipid conversion but lower carbohydrate reduction than the mesophilic process at all HRTs. However, total volatile solids reductions under thermophilic temperature were higher than those under mesophilic conditions at all test HRTs. Thermophilic effluents had much higher concentrations of ammonianitrogen, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, isovalerate, and caproate than mesophilic effluents. These compounds were responsible, in part, for the thermophilic effluent being more odoriferous than the mesophilic effluent. Thermophilic acetogens and methanogens had higher μmax (maximum specific growth rates) and Ks (half-velocity constants) than mesophilic acetogens and methanogens. The higher Ks values explain the occurrence of C3 and higher fatty acids in higher concentrations in thermophilic effluents. Except for the slightly more odor, thermophilic digestion was superior to mesophilic digestion in all respects.
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the relative merits of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of municipal sludge in terms of polymeric conversion efficiency, process kinetics, gas productivity, and effluent quality. High-rate digestion experiments were conducted with primaryactivated sludge mixtures at 35° and 55°C at HRTs of 15, 7, and 3 days. The thermophilic cultures were...
Author(s)
Sam Ghosh
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 40 - Residuals and Biosolids Management Symposium: Biosolids Digestion Innovations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:11L.905;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700784544578
Volume / Issue2000 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)905 - 923
Copyright2000
Word count252

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Sam Ghosh. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 11 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-286985CITANCHOR>.
Sam Ghosh. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-286985CITANCHOR.
Sam Ghosh
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THERMOPHILIC & MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 11, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-286985CITANCHOR