lastID = -287461
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 21:24:07 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:18:45 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:59:17 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:59:16 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES

EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES

EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES
Abstract
Underflow baffles have gained in popularity over the years as a viable mean to intercept floatables in Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs). This choice was mainly justified by the extremely low application cost of the solution although the efficiency of underflow baffles has never been clearly proven. The only similar application to underflow baffles are scum boards in grit chambers and clarifier. However, the flow conditions at CSO's vary considerably from those in grit chambers and clarifier. For this reason, review of the behavior of floatables in a rapid flow is paramount. Only then can comprehensive design criteria for underflow baffles and overflow chambers be suggested. Pilot scale tests, performed in a 17 meters long basin at various flowrates, had already shown that a critical horizontal velocity for floatables (Vcr) may develop in the overflow chambers. In this follow up study, the fate of intercepted floatable was investigated. It appears from this latest data that permanent capture of floatables decreases rapidly with an increase in the horizontal velocity of the flow, no matter what the baffle depth. Baffle depth increases capture at lower velocities (0.17 m/s) but become irrelevant at higher velocities (0.61 m/s). This data suggests that capture efficiency of existing underflow baffles in overflow chambers can be, at best, very low whenever the horizontal velocity increases above 0.30 m/s or 1ft/s.
Underflow baffles have gained in popularity over the years as a viable mean to intercept floatables in Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs). This choice was mainly justified by the extremely low application cost of the solution although the efficiency of underflow baffles has never been clearly proven. The only similar application to underflow baffles are scum boards in grit chambers and clarifier....
Author(s)
John F. CiganaGiscard LefebvreClaude MarcheMartin Couture
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2 - CS Operations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:4L.73;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785140683
Volume / Issue2000 / 4
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)73 - 79
Copyright2000
Word count230

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-287461
Get access
-287461
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES
Abstract
Underflow baffles have gained in popularity over the years as a viable mean to intercept floatables in Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs). This choice was mainly justified by the extremely low application cost of the solution although the efficiency of underflow baffles has never been clearly proven. The only similar application to underflow baffles are scum boards in grit chambers and clarifier. However, the flow conditions at CSO's vary considerably from those in grit chambers and clarifier. For this reason, review of the behavior of floatables in a rapid flow is paramount. Only then can comprehensive design criteria for underflow baffles and overflow chambers be suggested. Pilot scale tests, performed in a 17 meters long basin at various flowrates, had already shown that a critical horizontal velocity for floatables (Vcr) may develop in the overflow chambers. In this follow up study, the fate of intercepted floatable was investigated. It appears from this latest data that permanent capture of floatables decreases rapidly with an increase in the horizontal velocity of the flow, no matter what the baffle depth. Baffle depth increases capture at lower velocities (0.17 m/s) but become irrelevant at higher velocities (0.61 m/s). This data suggests that capture efficiency of existing underflow baffles in overflow chambers can be, at best, very low whenever the horizontal velocity increases above 0.30 m/s or 1ft/s.
Underflow baffles have gained in popularity over the years as a viable mean to intercept floatables in Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs). This choice was mainly justified by the extremely low application cost of the solution although the efficiency of underflow baffles has never been clearly proven. The only similar application to underflow baffles are scum boards in grit chambers and clarifier....
Author(s)
John F. CiganaGiscard LefebvreClaude MarcheMartin Couture
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2 - CS Operations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:4L.73;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785140683
Volume / Issue2000 / 4
Content sourceCollection Systems Conference
First / last page(s)73 - 79
Copyright2000
Word count230

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
John F. Cigana# Giscard Lefebvre# Claude Marche# Martin Couture. EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 26 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-287461CITANCHOR>.
John F. Cigana# Giscard Lefebvre# Claude Marche# Martin Couture. EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 26, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287461CITANCHOR.
John F. Cigana# Giscard Lefebvre# Claude Marche# Martin Couture
EXPERIMENTAL CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF FLOATABLES USING UNDERFLOW BAFFLES
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 26, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287461CITANCHOR