lastID = -287640
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:53:43 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:53:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:51:04 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:51:03 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:59:23 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:59:22 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River

Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River

Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River
Abstract
In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, entered into a Federal Consent Order to complete a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for dioxin for the Ohio River by September, 2000. The Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission is completing the monitoring, modeling and load analysis on behalf of Region 3. Allocations are not covered in this report, however interstate allocations may be coordinated through the Commission's TMDL Work Group in the future.TMDLs are required for waters not meeting applicable water quality standards after application of best practicable control technology. A TMDL must be designed to meet water quality standards, which is 0.013 pg/L for the Ohio River for 2,3,7,8-TCDD (dioxin). TMDLs must include load and wasteload allocations, which are not included in this report. TMDLs must consider background conditions, which are accounted for through the utilization of the dioxin sample data. TMDLs must consider critical conditions and seasonality, which can be accounted for by utilizing a high flow critical condition when developing. The flow associated with a one-year flood is selected as the critical condition for which total maximum daily loads are calculated.Based on West Virginia's 1998 303(d) list, a dioxin TMDL is to be completed for the Ohio River segment from Ohio River Mile (ORM) 237.5 to ORM 317. “High Volume” dioxin sampling, a collection technique that effectively concentrates 1000 liters (L) into a single sample in order to achieve necessary detection levels, was conducted within the TMDL segment during 1997-1998. Multiple samples were collected over the period at various flows. The data are used to estimate TMDL segment boundary loads and to verify water quality modeling results. The SYMTOX 4 water quality model was utilized to determine dioxin loads at various river flows. The model was run at three flows: seven day-ten year low flow, harmonic mean flow, and a one-year flood high flow. These flow regimes compare with flows at which monitoring data were collected. Modeling results cannot be reliably verified at flows substantially above a one-year flood.The highest dioxin concentrations and loads in the Ohio River occur immediately downstream of the Kanawha River at ORM 266. Based on sampling results, Ohio River dioxin concentrations increase with increasing flow. At the one-year flood, modeled dioxin concentrations and loads at ORM 266 are 0.13 pg/L and 83,700 ug/day, respectively. The stream criterion and resulting load that would not cause water quality standards violations at the one-year flood flow condition are 0.013 p/L and 8500 ug/L, respectively. Thus, Ohio River loads would need to be reduced by ninety percent to meet water quality standards at the one-year flood. It is anticipated that loadings would be greater at higher flows.There is no net increase of dioxin within the TMDL segment, thus all important sources are located upstream of the TMDL segment. At high flow, fifty-five percent of the dioxin load originates from the Kanawha Basin, and the remaining forty-five percent from the Ohio Basin upstream of ORM 264. While several contaminated sites have been identified in the Kanawha Basin, no dioxin loads to surface waters within or upstream of the TMDL segment have been identified. Ohio River dioxin loads at high flow are approximately one thousand times greater than at low flow. Potential high flow-related sources include runoff from contaminated land sites and resuspension of contaminated bed sediments. Atmospheric deposition was eliminated as a source within the TMDL segment based on results of limited sampling, however it could be a source upstream of the TMDL segment. Results of an upper-Ohio River dioxin survey suggest the possibility of sources upstream of ORM 20 and between ORM 129 and 175.Potential dioxin sources upstream of the TMDL segment must be identified and quantified if allocations are to be effective in achieving water quality standards. As part of that process, loads from resuspension of contaminated bed sediments should be quantified. A monitoring plan to identify and quantify sources in the upper-Ohio River is presented and will be completed during 2000-01 under the Ohio River Watershed Pollutant reduction Program.
In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, entered into a Federal Consent Order to complete a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for dioxin for the Ohio River by September, 2000. The Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission is completing the monitoring, modeling and load analysis on behalf of Region 3. Allocations are not covered in this report, however interstate allocations...
Author(s)
Jason HeathSam DinkinsAlan Vicory
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 14 - TMDL Modeling Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:6L.1162;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785149558
Volume / Issue2000 / 6
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)1162 - 1183
Copyright2000
Word count680

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-287640
Get access
-287640
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River
Abstract
In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, entered into a Federal Consent Order to complete a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for dioxin for the Ohio River by September, 2000. The Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission is completing the monitoring, modeling and load analysis on behalf of Region 3. Allocations are not covered in this report, however interstate allocations may be coordinated through the Commission's TMDL Work Group in the future.TMDLs are required for waters not meeting applicable water quality standards after application of best practicable control technology. A TMDL must be designed to meet water quality standards, which is 0.013 pg/L for the Ohio River for 2,3,7,8-TCDD (dioxin). TMDLs must include load and wasteload allocations, which are not included in this report. TMDLs must consider background conditions, which are accounted for through the utilization of the dioxin sample data. TMDLs must consider critical conditions and seasonality, which can be accounted for by utilizing a high flow critical condition when developing. The flow associated with a one-year flood is selected as the critical condition for which total maximum daily loads are calculated.Based on West Virginia's 1998 303(d) list, a dioxin TMDL is to be completed for the Ohio River segment from Ohio River Mile (ORM) 237.5 to ORM 317. “High Volume” dioxin sampling, a collection technique that effectively concentrates 1000 liters (L) into a single sample in order to achieve necessary detection levels, was conducted within the TMDL segment during 1997-1998. Multiple samples were collected over the period at various flows. The data are used to estimate TMDL segment boundary loads and to verify water quality modeling results. The SYMTOX 4 water quality model was utilized to determine dioxin loads at various river flows. The model was run at three flows: seven day-ten year low flow, harmonic mean flow, and a one-year flood high flow. These flow regimes compare with flows at which monitoring data were collected. Modeling results cannot be reliably verified at flows substantially above a one-year flood.The highest dioxin concentrations and loads in the Ohio River occur immediately downstream of the Kanawha River at ORM 266. Based on sampling results, Ohio River dioxin concentrations increase with increasing flow. At the one-year flood, modeled dioxin concentrations and loads at ORM 266 are 0.13 pg/L and 83,700 ug/day, respectively. The stream criterion and resulting load that would not cause water quality standards violations at the one-year flood flow condition are 0.013 p/L and 8500 ug/L, respectively. Thus, Ohio River loads would need to be reduced by ninety percent to meet water quality standards at the one-year flood. It is anticipated that loadings would be greater at higher flows.There is no net increase of dioxin within the TMDL segment, thus all important sources are located upstream of the TMDL segment. At high flow, fifty-five percent of the dioxin load originates from the Kanawha Basin, and the remaining forty-five percent from the Ohio Basin upstream of ORM 264. While several contaminated sites have been identified in the Kanawha Basin, no dioxin loads to surface waters within or upstream of the TMDL segment have been identified. Ohio River dioxin loads at high flow are approximately one thousand times greater than at low flow. Potential high flow-related sources include runoff from contaminated land sites and resuspension of contaminated bed sediments. Atmospheric deposition was eliminated as a source within the TMDL segment based on results of limited sampling, however it could be a source upstream of the TMDL segment. Results of an upper-Ohio River dioxin survey suggest the possibility of sources upstream of ORM 20 and between ORM 129 and 175.Potential dioxin sources upstream of the TMDL segment must be identified and quantified if allocations are to be effective in achieving water quality standards. As part of that process, loads from resuspension of contaminated bed sediments should be quantified. A monitoring plan to identify and quantify sources in the upper-Ohio River is presented and will be completed during 2000-01 under the Ohio River Watershed Pollutant reduction Program.
In 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, entered into a Federal Consent Order to complete a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for dioxin for the Ohio River by September, 2000. The Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission is completing the monitoring, modeling and load analysis on behalf of Region 3. Allocations are not covered in this report, however interstate allocations...
Author(s)
Jason HeathSam DinkinsAlan Vicory
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 14 - TMDL Modeling Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2000
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20000101)2000:6L.1162;1-
DOI10.2175/193864700785149558
Volume / Issue2000 / 6
Content sourceWatershed Conference
First / last page(s)1162 - 1183
Copyright2000
Word count680

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Jason Heath# Sam Dinkins# Alan Vicory. Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-287640CITANCHOR>.
Jason Heath# Sam Dinkins# Alan Vicory. Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 1, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287640CITANCHOR.
Jason Heath# Sam Dinkins# Alan Vicory
Development of a Total Maximum Daily Load for Dioxin for the Ohio River
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 1, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287640CITANCHOR