lastID = -287957
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 13:01:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:18:22 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:18:21 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS

MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS

MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS
Abstract
Two, two-stage, cyclic (TSC) anaerobic filter reactor systems were operated for almost two years to determine the COD removal performance under various COD loading rates and operating cycle times. A two-stage reactor system without flow reversal was used as a control. Tests indicated that the COD removal efficiency of the TSC configuration was about 15% greater than the control when operating at COD loading rates of 8 g/L-day. This improved efficiency occurred because the second stage of the control reactor system provided little additional removal. The second stage of the TSC reactor systems contained active biomass that provided substantial COD removal above that in the first stage. A mass transfer model indicated that the performance of the TSC process was controlled by hydraulic retention time rather than by biodegradation kinetics.
Two, two-stage, cyclic (TSC) anaerobic filter reactor systems were operated for almost two years to determine the COD removal performance under various COD loading rates and operating cycle times. A two-stage reactor system without flow reversal was used as a control. Tests indicated that the COD removal efficiency of the TSC configuration was about 15% greater than the control when operating at...
Author(s)
Young-Tai ChoJames C. Young
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 60 - Industrial Issues and Treatment Technology Symposium: Biological Treatment in the Food Processing Industry
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:11L.764;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701790860155
Volume / Issue2001 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)764 - 782
Copyright2001
Word count137

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-287957
Get access
-287957
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS
Abstract
Two, two-stage, cyclic (TSC) anaerobic filter reactor systems were operated for almost two years to determine the COD removal performance under various COD loading rates and operating cycle times. A two-stage reactor system without flow reversal was used as a control. Tests indicated that the COD removal efficiency of the TSC configuration was about 15% greater than the control when operating at COD loading rates of 8 g/L-day. This improved efficiency occurred because the second stage of the control reactor system provided little additional removal. The second stage of the TSC reactor systems contained active biomass that provided substantial COD removal above that in the first stage. A mass transfer model indicated that the performance of the TSC process was controlled by hydraulic retention time rather than by biodegradation kinetics.
Two, two-stage, cyclic (TSC) anaerobic filter reactor systems were operated for almost two years to determine the COD removal performance under various COD loading rates and operating cycle times. A two-stage reactor system without flow reversal was used as a control. Tests indicated that the COD removal efficiency of the TSC configuration was about 15% greater than the control when operating at...
Author(s)
Young-Tai ChoJames C. Young
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 60 - Industrial Issues and Treatment Technology Symposium: Biological Treatment in the Food Processing Industry
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:11L.764;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701790860155
Volume / Issue2001 / 11
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)764 - 782
Copyright2001
Word count137

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Young-Tai Cho# James C. Young. MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-287957CITANCHOR>.
Young-Tai Cho# James C. Young. MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287957CITANCHOR.
Young-Tai Cho# James C. Young
MASS TRANSFER MODEL FOR FIXED-FILM ANAEROBIC REACTORS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-287957CITANCHOR