lastID = -288282
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:42:57 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:42:56 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:59:10 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:59:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:36:17 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:36:16 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS

SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS

SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Abstract
A growing component of the biosolids marketing program of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (District) is the use of biosolids as a substitute for the more expensive topsoil used in local urban reclamation projects. The success of using biosolids as a topsoil substitute depends on their ability to enhance the fertility and/or physical properties of the soil, and sustaining the growth of plants in a biosolids-soil matrix in which biosolids constitute a significant portion. For this reason the District has initiated a research program to compare the properties of District's biosolids with that of the typical topsoil available in the Chicago metropolitan area, and determine whether the biosolids produced at the District can be used in lieu of topsoil. The germination and growth of various species of turf grasses, forage legumes, wild flowers, and prairie grasses were studied in biosolids and topsoil.The texture of biosolids was determined to be silty loam and silty clay or silty clay loam for topsoil, indicating that biosolids would provide better tilth for plant growth. The organic matter content of biosolids (approximately 38 percent volatile solids) was higher than in topsoil (ranging from 0.5 to 10.0 percent volatile solids). In addition, the cation exchange capacity, total N content, available P content, water soluble species and NO3-N content, and soluble salt content were higher in biosolids than in topsoil. Moisture content at field capacity was 85 percent (g water/ g dry solids) for biosolids and 27 percent for topsoil.The mean electrical conductivity of saturated paste extracts of air-dried District biosolids was 9.6 dS/m as compared to 1–3 dS/m for topsoil. The predominant cationic species in anaerobically digested sludge is ammonium, while the predominant anionic species is bicarbonate (alkalinity). However, the predominant cationic species in the air-dried biosolids derived from the District's sludge processing train (SPT) remained to be ammonium, whereas the predominant anionic species were found to be sulfate. Volatile solids, TKN, NH4-N, and soluble salt content destruction through the SPT was found to be 41.7, 64.5, 81.6, and 93.7 percent, respectively. In spite of the significant reduction in soluble salt content through the SPT, air-dried biosolids contain significantly higher levels of soluble salts and NH4-N than topsoil. Hence, the germination and growth of turf grass and native plant species in biosolids were also evaluated.In a green house study, twenty varieties of turf grass were screened for their growth rate in biosolids. Under simulated irrigated conditions, growth rates for perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, red fescue, alkaligrass, Kentucky bluegrass, bentgrass, and red top were greater in biosolids than in topsoil. Under conditions simulating mild drought, growth rates for perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, red fescues, and alkaligrass were greater in biosolids than in topsoil. The growth rates were lower for Kentucky bluegrass, bentgrass, and red top in biosolids than in topsoil.The concentrations of all essential nutrient elements were found to be sufficient for turf grasses grown in biosolids. Leaves of turf grasses grown on biosolids were found to have significantly higher P, Ca and Mg content than leaves of turf grasses grown on fertilized topsoil, indicating that biosolids have superior nutrient supplying power than fertilized topsoil.The suitability of biosolids as a substitute for topsoil was also determined for the growth of turfgrass, forage legumes, wildflowers, and prairie grasses. Over fifty turf grass varieties, representing 16 species; ten forage grass varieties representing 6 species; ten species of forage legumes; and over 30 species of wild flowers and prairie grasses were screened for their ability to germinate in biosolids and topsoil. In general, biosolids were observed to exert a mild inhibition of germination in many species, presumably due to higher soluble salt content initially present in biosolids as compared to topsoil. However, this soluble salt effect is expected to be transient and short lived in the field due to nitrification of ammonium and dissipation of soluble salts. Species of turf, forage, prairie grass and wild flowers were identified that germinated as well or better in biosolids than in topsoil despite the higher level of soluble salts.
A growing component of the biosolids marketing program of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (District) is the use of biosolids as a substitute for the more expensive topsoil used in local urban reclamation projects. The success of using biosolids as a topsoil substitute depends on their ability to enhance the fertility and/or physical properties of the soil, and...
Author(s)
Prakasam TataThomas C. GranatoRichard I. PietzCecil Lue HingRichard Lanyon
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2: Biosolids Success Stories
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.115;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784992912
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)115 - 136
Copyright2001
Word count685

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-288282
Get access
-288282
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Abstract
A growing component of the biosolids marketing program of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (District) is the use of biosolids as a substitute for the more expensive topsoil used in local urban reclamation projects. The success of using biosolids as a topsoil substitute depends on their ability to enhance the fertility and/or physical properties of the soil, and sustaining the growth of plants in a biosolids-soil matrix in which biosolids constitute a significant portion. For this reason the District has initiated a research program to compare the properties of District's biosolids with that of the typical topsoil available in the Chicago metropolitan area, and determine whether the biosolids produced at the District can be used in lieu of topsoil. The germination and growth of various species of turf grasses, forage legumes, wild flowers, and prairie grasses were studied in biosolids and topsoil.The texture of biosolids was determined to be silty loam and silty clay or silty clay loam for topsoil, indicating that biosolids would provide better tilth for plant growth. The organic matter content of biosolids (approximately 38 percent volatile solids) was higher than in topsoil (ranging from 0.5 to 10.0 percent volatile solids). In addition, the cation exchange capacity, total N content, available P content, water soluble species and NO3-N content, and soluble salt content were higher in biosolids than in topsoil. Moisture content at field capacity was 85 percent (g water/ g dry solids) for biosolids and 27 percent for topsoil.The mean electrical conductivity of saturated paste extracts of air-dried District biosolids was 9.6 dS/m as compared to 1–3 dS/m for topsoil. The predominant cationic species in anaerobically digested sludge is ammonium, while the predominant anionic species is bicarbonate (alkalinity). However, the predominant cationic species in the air-dried biosolids derived from the District's sludge processing train (SPT) remained to be ammonium, whereas the predominant anionic species were found to be sulfate. Volatile solids, TKN, NH4-N, and soluble salt content destruction through the SPT was found to be 41.7, 64.5, 81.6, and 93.7 percent, respectively. In spite of the significant reduction in soluble salt content through the SPT, air-dried biosolids contain significantly higher levels of soluble salts and NH4-N than topsoil. Hence, the germination and growth of turf grass and native plant species in biosolids were also evaluated.In a green house study, twenty varieties of turf grass were screened for their growth rate in biosolids. Under simulated irrigated conditions, growth rates for perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, red fescue, alkaligrass, Kentucky bluegrass, bentgrass, and red top were greater in biosolids than in topsoil. Under conditions simulating mild drought, growth rates for perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, red fescues, and alkaligrass were greater in biosolids than in topsoil. The growth rates were lower for Kentucky bluegrass, bentgrass, and red top in biosolids than in topsoil.The concentrations of all essential nutrient elements were found to be sufficient for turf grasses grown in biosolids. Leaves of turf grasses grown on biosolids were found to have significantly higher P, Ca and Mg content than leaves of turf grasses grown on fertilized topsoil, indicating that biosolids have superior nutrient supplying power than fertilized topsoil.The suitability of biosolids as a substitute for topsoil was also determined for the growth of turfgrass, forage legumes, wildflowers, and prairie grasses. Over fifty turf grass varieties, representing 16 species; ten forage grass varieties representing 6 species; ten species of forage legumes; and over 30 species of wild flowers and prairie grasses were screened for their ability to germinate in biosolids and topsoil. In general, biosolids were observed to exert a mild inhibition of germination in many species, presumably due to higher soluble salt content initially present in biosolids as compared to topsoil. However, this soluble salt effect is expected to be transient and short lived in the field due to nitrification of ammonium and dissipation of soluble salts. Species of turf, forage, prairie grass and wild flowers were identified that germinated as well or better in biosolids than in topsoil despite the higher level of soluble salts.
A growing component of the biosolids marketing program of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (District) is the use of biosolids as a substitute for the more expensive topsoil used in local urban reclamation projects. The success of using biosolids as a topsoil substitute depends on their ability to enhance the fertility and/or physical properties of the soil, and...
Author(s)
Prakasam TataThomas C. GranatoRichard I. PietzCecil Lue HingRichard Lanyon
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 2: Biosolids Success Stories
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2001
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20010101)2001:1L.115;1-
DOI10.2175/193864701784992912
Volume / Issue2001 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)115 - 136
Copyright2001
Word count685

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Prakasam Tata# Thomas C. Granato# Richard I. Pietz# Cecil Lue Hing# Richard Lanyon. SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-288282CITANCHOR>.
Prakasam Tata# Thomas C. Granato# Richard I. Pietz# Cecil Lue Hing# Richard Lanyon. SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288282CITANCHOR.
Prakasam Tata# Thomas C. Granato# Richard I. Pietz# Cecil Lue Hing# Richard Lanyon
SUITABILITY OF BIOSOLIDS FOR USE AS A TOPSOIL SUBSTITUTE IN URBAN RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-288282CITANCHOR