lastID = -289401
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:06:24 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:54:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:54:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 23:15:22 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:15:21 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:15:20 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS

FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS

FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS
Abstract
Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR) is a retrofit process for multiple hearth biosolids incinerators, in which flue gas from the feed hearth is recycled to a hearth below the volatile burning hearth. There are three installations in operation for several years now: Hartford, CT, Woonsocket, RI, and New Haven, CT. The benefits include reduction of NOx emissions, increased stability of operation with less temperature fluctuations, reduced formation of slag, increase in capacity due to the ability to operate at lower excess air levels, and less unburned material in the ash.Stack tests during FGR have shown that NOx stack emissions averaged 2.18 lb NOx/dry ton biosolids at New Haven, averaged 1.71 lb NOx/dry ton at Hartford, and averaged 3.3 to 5.78 lb NOx/dry ton at Woonsocket. The average of these three facilities is 2.69 lb/dry ton, which is about half of the AP-42 emission factor (5.0 lb/dry ton) for multiple hearth biosolids incinerators. Concentration of NOx ranged from 53 to 202 ppm dry basis (ppmvd) corrected to 7% oxygen.Use of FGR results in steadier operation. An attempt has been made to quantify this by selecting two 24-hour periods at one of the installations, one with and the other without FGR. The temperature charts were digitized by taking six data points for each hearth every hour. Each hour was averaged and its standard deviation calculated. Prior to the FGR installation, the most variable hearth temperature in the incinerator occurred on hearth 5 of 7 hearths, where there was an hourly standard deviation as high as 101°F during a representative period. Following the FGR installation, hearth 5 remained the most variable, but the temperature's standard deviation was reduced to a maximum of 33°F.The benefits of FGR include reduced slag formation and associated lost time. A review of the operating records at Woonsocket show that prior to FGR, 3.7% down time resulted from the need to remove slag. Monthly, about 10 tons of slag had to be removed from the incinerator. The installation now operates for periods of months without de-slagging the incinerator. Because of steadier operation and reduced slag formation, life of the refractory and rabble teeth is extended.Multiple hearth sewage biosolids incinerators with FGR are able to operate with less excess air, with a consequent reduction in oxygen concentration and quantity of flue gas. This makes it easier to meet the THC requirement, in cases where the operation is limited by the available burner capacity and combustion volume in the top hearth of the incinerator. The experience at Woonsocket shows that before FGR, the plant operators processed an average of 382 dry tons/week. After FGR, the rate increased to an average of 419 dry tons/week. This 10% increase is partly due to less slag removal time, partly due to smoother operation and to the incinerator's new ability to maintain the emission rate for THC at a lower oxygen level.The recirculated hot gas to the lower hearths maintains a high enough temperature to complete the burnout of the organic component of the biosolids. Since the introduction of FGR, there have been no “sludge balls” found in the ash from any of the installations. It has been noted that the ash is finer and free from lumps and clinkers. Difficulties with the ash transfer system at Woonsocket have been greatly reduced. The fine ash passes easily through the conveying system without clogging.
Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR) is a retrofit process for multiple hearth biosolids incinerators, in which flue gas from the feed hearth is recycled to a hearth below the volatile burning hearth. There are three installations in operation for several years now: Hartford, CT, Woonsocket, RI, and New Haven, CT. The benefits include reduction of NOx emissions, increased stability of operation with less...
Author(s)
Louis T. BarryRichard GramlichJoseph Megale
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Thernal Processes I: Emerging Trends & Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:3L.532;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785302203
Volume / Issue2002 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)532 - 547
Copyright2002
Word count566

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289401
Get access
-289401
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS
Abstract
Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR) is a retrofit process for multiple hearth biosolids incinerators, in which flue gas from the feed hearth is recycled to a hearth below the volatile burning hearth. There are three installations in operation for several years now: Hartford, CT, Woonsocket, RI, and New Haven, CT. The benefits include reduction of NOx emissions, increased stability of operation with less temperature fluctuations, reduced formation of slag, increase in capacity due to the ability to operate at lower excess air levels, and less unburned material in the ash.Stack tests during FGR have shown that NOx stack emissions averaged 2.18 lb NOx/dry ton biosolids at New Haven, averaged 1.71 lb NOx/dry ton at Hartford, and averaged 3.3 to 5.78 lb NOx/dry ton at Woonsocket. The average of these three facilities is 2.69 lb/dry ton, which is about half of the AP-42 emission factor (5.0 lb/dry ton) for multiple hearth biosolids incinerators. Concentration of NOx ranged from 53 to 202 ppm dry basis (ppmvd) corrected to 7% oxygen.Use of FGR results in steadier operation. An attempt has been made to quantify this by selecting two 24-hour periods at one of the installations, one with and the other without FGR. The temperature charts were digitized by taking six data points for each hearth every hour. Each hour was averaged and its standard deviation calculated. Prior to the FGR installation, the most variable hearth temperature in the incinerator occurred on hearth 5 of 7 hearths, where there was an hourly standard deviation as high as 101°F during a representative period. Following the FGR installation, hearth 5 remained the most variable, but the temperature's standard deviation was reduced to a maximum of 33°F.The benefits of FGR include reduced slag formation and associated lost time. A review of the operating records at Woonsocket show that prior to FGR, 3.7% down time resulted from the need to remove slag. Monthly, about 10 tons of slag had to be removed from the incinerator. The installation now operates for periods of months without de-slagging the incinerator. Because of steadier operation and reduced slag formation, life of the refractory and rabble teeth is extended.Multiple hearth sewage biosolids incinerators with FGR are able to operate with less excess air, with a consequent reduction in oxygen concentration and quantity of flue gas. This makes it easier to meet the THC requirement, in cases where the operation is limited by the available burner capacity and combustion volume in the top hearth of the incinerator. The experience at Woonsocket shows that before FGR, the plant operators processed an average of 382 dry tons/week. After FGR, the rate increased to an average of 419 dry tons/week. This 10% increase is partly due to less slag removal time, partly due to smoother operation and to the incinerator's new ability to maintain the emission rate for THC at a lower oxygen level.The recirculated hot gas to the lower hearths maintains a high enough temperature to complete the burnout of the organic component of the biosolids. Since the introduction of FGR, there have been no “sludge balls” found in the ash from any of the installations. It has been noted that the ash is finer and free from lumps and clinkers. Difficulties with the ash transfer system at Woonsocket have been greatly reduced. The fine ash passes easily through the conveying system without clogging.
Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR) is a retrofit process for multiple hearth biosolids incinerators, in which flue gas from the feed hearth is recycled to a hearth below the volatile burning hearth. There are three installations in operation for several years now: Hartford, CT, Woonsocket, RI, and New Haven, CT. The benefits include reduction of NOx emissions, increased stability of operation with less...
Author(s)
Louis T. BarryRichard GramlichJoseph Megale
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 10: Thernal Processes I: Emerging Trends & Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:3L.532;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785302203
Volume / Issue2002 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)532 - 547
Copyright2002
Word count566

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Louis T. Barry# Richard Gramlich# Joseph Megale. FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 10 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289401CITANCHOR>.
Louis T. Barry# Richard Gramlich# Joseph Megale. FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289401CITANCHOR.
Louis T. Barry# Richard Gramlich# Joseph Megale
FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION IN MULTIPLE HEARTH BIOSOLIDS INCINERATORS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 10, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289401CITANCHOR