lastID = -289415
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 14:59:09 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:54:37 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:54:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:06:32 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:06:31 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception

Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception

Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception
Abstract
We can all agree that there is a need to improve public perception regarding the recycling of biosolids. The public at large often views biosolids recycling with a certain level of disdain, arguing that the human waste and industrial flow that enters the wastewater treatment plants of America contain contaminants that might potentially cause health problems. We should not argue with this statement. Biosolids can contain pathogens, heavy metals, and other contaminants that might raise concerns with the receiving public. What the biosolids industry needs to make perfectly clear is that the product placed on farmers fields, strip mines, forestland, and other reuse sites is monitored, treated, tested, and recycled in a manner designed to limit contaminants and therefore limit risk. The public needs to recognize the measures taken to protect their health and the extremely limited risk to which they are exposed. In order to accomplish this, we need to present examples to the public that compare the risk of biosolids use to risks undertaken in other aspects of their lives. This paper presents examples of relative risk for the major pollutants of concern – odors, metals, and pathogens.
We can all agree that there is a need to improve public perception regarding the recycling of biosolids. The public at large often views biosolids recycling with a certain level of disdain, arguing that the human waste and industrial flow that enters the wastewater treatment plants of America contain contaminants that might potentially cause health problems. We should not argue with this...
Author(s)
Chris Peot
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3: Public Support
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:3L.68;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785302735
Volume / Issue2002 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)68 - 75
Copyright2002
Word count199

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289415
Get access
-289415
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception
Abstract
We can all agree that there is a need to improve public perception regarding the recycling of biosolids. The public at large often views biosolids recycling with a certain level of disdain, arguing that the human waste and industrial flow that enters the wastewater treatment plants of America contain contaminants that might potentially cause health problems. We should not argue with this statement. Biosolids can contain pathogens, heavy metals, and other contaminants that might raise concerns with the receiving public. What the biosolids industry needs to make perfectly clear is that the product placed on farmers fields, strip mines, forestland, and other reuse sites is monitored, treated, tested, and recycled in a manner designed to limit contaminants and therefore limit risk. The public needs to recognize the measures taken to protect their health and the extremely limited risk to which they are exposed. In order to accomplish this, we need to present examples to the public that compare the risk of biosolids use to risks undertaken in other aspects of their lives. This paper presents examples of relative risk for the major pollutants of concern – odors, metals, and pathogens.
We can all agree that there is a need to improve public perception regarding the recycling of biosolids. The public at large often views biosolids recycling with a certain level of disdain, arguing that the human waste and industrial flow that enters the wastewater treatment plants of America contain contaminants that might potentially cause health problems. We should not argue with this...
Author(s)
Chris Peot
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3: Public Support
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:3L.68;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785302735
Volume / Issue2002 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)68 - 75
Copyright2002
Word count199

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Chris Peot. Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 10 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289415CITANCHOR>.
Chris Peot. Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 10, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289415CITANCHOR.
Chris Peot
Discussing Relative Risk – An Approach to Improving Biosolids Public Perception
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 10, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289415CITANCHOR