lastID = -289769
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 16:47:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 16:47:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 02:03:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:59:47 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:59:46 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:59:45 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY

UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY

UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY
Abstract
Total maximum daily load (TMDL) modeling is typically used to link the allowable load (the TMDL) to the criterion in a water quality standard, while pollutant allocation modeling is applied to apportion the TMDL among sources in the watershed. An essential element of the TMDL modeling is the margin of safety (MOS), which is intended to reflect the uncertainty in the TMDL forecast to meet the criterion. Thus, in principle, when the TMDL modeling is conducted according to EPA requirements, an error analysis is to be undertaken to estimate the uncertainty in the forecast of the criterion.However, the recent NRC report (NRC 2001) noted that the basis for the TMDL is attainment of the designated use. With that perspective, the true uncertainty in the forecast TMDL is not simply the uncertainty between the pollutant load and the criterion; rather, it is the forecast uncertainty between the pollutant load and the designated use. The criterion is a surrogate for the designated use, and the NRC observed that it is attainment of the designated use that is the ultimate goal of the TMDL. Thus, the MOS ignores the uncertainty between the criterion and the designated use.What are the implications of this underestimated or hidden error? Clearly, this is a function of the adequacy of the criterion as a surrogate for the designated use. If the criterion is essentially a perfect indicator of designated use, then hidden error is inconsequential. However, if the criterion is an imperfect surrogate, or more likely, the adequacy of the criterion as a surrogate for designated use is poorly known, then the hidden uncertainty is also poorly known.In this paper, we propose Bayesian (probability) network models linking the criterion to the designated use as a flexible, probabilistic approach for representing both the statistical expressions and the judgmental assessments necessary to relate criterion to use. As an example to illustrate concepts, the Bayesian modeling strategy is considered for the problem of eutrophication. Designated uses related to fish propagation, shellfish habitat, public water supply, and aesthetics are examined associated with nutrient, chlorophyll, and dissolved oxygen criteria. The outcomes of this study will be measures of the magnitude and consequence of the hidden error, leading to guidance on sensible choices and recommendations for water quality criteria and TMDL margin of safety assessments.
Total maximum daily load (TMDL) modeling is typically used to link the allowable load (the TMDL) to the criterion in a water quality standard, while pollutant allocation modeling is applied to apportion the TMDL among sources in the watershed. An essential element of the TMDL modeling is the margin of safety (MOS), which is intended to reflect the uncertainty in the TMDL forecast to meet the...
Author(s)
Kenneth H. ReckhowCraig A. StowMark E. Borsuk
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13 Water Quality Criteria
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:8L.1223;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785072641
Volume / Issue2002 / 8
Content sourceTMDLS Conference
First / last page(s)1223 - 1228
Copyright2002
Word count397

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289769
Get access
-289769
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY
Abstract
Total maximum daily load (TMDL) modeling is typically used to link the allowable load (the TMDL) to the criterion in a water quality standard, while pollutant allocation modeling is applied to apportion the TMDL among sources in the watershed. An essential element of the TMDL modeling is the margin of safety (MOS), which is intended to reflect the uncertainty in the TMDL forecast to meet the criterion. Thus, in principle, when the TMDL modeling is conducted according to EPA requirements, an error analysis is to be undertaken to estimate the uncertainty in the forecast of the criterion.However, the recent NRC report (NRC 2001) noted that the basis for the TMDL is attainment of the designated use. With that perspective, the true uncertainty in the forecast TMDL is not simply the uncertainty between the pollutant load and the criterion; rather, it is the forecast uncertainty between the pollutant load and the designated use. The criterion is a surrogate for the designated use, and the NRC observed that it is attainment of the designated use that is the ultimate goal of the TMDL. Thus, the MOS ignores the uncertainty between the criterion and the designated use.What are the implications of this underestimated or hidden error? Clearly, this is a function of the adequacy of the criterion as a surrogate for the designated use. If the criterion is essentially a perfect indicator of designated use, then hidden error is inconsequential. However, if the criterion is an imperfect surrogate, or more likely, the adequacy of the criterion as a surrogate for designated use is poorly known, then the hidden uncertainty is also poorly known.In this paper, we propose Bayesian (probability) network models linking the criterion to the designated use as a flexible, probabilistic approach for representing both the statistical expressions and the judgmental assessments necessary to relate criterion to use. As an example to illustrate concepts, the Bayesian modeling strategy is considered for the problem of eutrophication. Designated uses related to fish propagation, shellfish habitat, public water supply, and aesthetics are examined associated with nutrient, chlorophyll, and dissolved oxygen criteria. The outcomes of this study will be measures of the magnitude and consequence of the hidden error, leading to guidance on sensible choices and recommendations for water quality criteria and TMDL margin of safety assessments.
Total maximum daily load (TMDL) modeling is typically used to link the allowable load (the TMDL) to the criterion in a water quality standard, while pollutant allocation modeling is applied to apportion the TMDL among sources in the watershed. An essential element of the TMDL modeling is the margin of safety (MOS), which is intended to reflect the uncertainty in the TMDL forecast to meet the...
Author(s)
Kenneth H. ReckhowCraig A. StowMark E. Borsuk
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 13 Water Quality Criteria
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2002
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20020101)2002:8L.1223;1-
DOI10.2175/193864702785072641
Volume / Issue2002 / 8
Content sourceTMDLS Conference
First / last page(s)1223 - 1228
Copyright2002
Word count397

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Kenneth H. Reckhow# Craig A. Stow# Mark E. Borsuk. UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289769CITANCHOR>.
Kenneth H. Reckhow# Craig A. Stow# Mark E. Borsuk. UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289769CITANCHOR.
Kenneth H. Reckhow# Craig A. Stow# Mark E. Borsuk
UNCERTAINTY BETWEEN THE CRITERION AND THE DESIGNATED USE: IMPLICATIONS FOR STANDARDS AND TMDL MARGIN OF SAFETY
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289769CITANCHOR