lastID = -289854
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 21:27:30 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:27:29 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER

CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER

CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER
Abstract
When first contemplated, it seems elementary that a primary treatment system that settles and removes solids only once would be advantageous to a system that settles and removes solids twice. In the latter system, the underflow from the first phase of settling becomes the influent to the second phase. It is obvious that there are additional chances to lose solids to the effluent in the latter system and effective removal efficiencies are the product of removal efficiencies in each removal step. Therefore, common sense may lead us to the premature conclusion that a primary system that must settle and remove solids twice would not be advantageous.However, the Town of Speedway, Indiana Wastewater Treatment Plant operates successfully in a mode that requires settling of solids twice to be effectively removed in primary treatment. The rectangular primary settling that receive process flow are operated in a “zero-blanket” mode. Sludge withdrawal from the five process tanks is continually sent to an off-line gravity thickener to be settled and removed a second time. While overall, average primary removal efficiencies remain comparable to that of conventional primary treatment, primary treatment performance is significantly enhanced under peak, wet-weather flow scenarios. This is due to the absence of a sludge blanket in the tank's receiving peak process flows that would otherwise be subject to effluent washout under peak flow conditions. Superior performance under peak conditions is now achievable without impacting primary sludge solids content. Elevated sludge blanket levels necessary for optimizing underflow solids content are maintained in the primary sludge gravity thickener. Sludge blanket management has historically been a “dual edged sword” where the ability to process peak flows without solids washout was only possible at the expense of underflow solids content. With process modifications to allow zero-blanket operation with a primary sludge gravity thickener, the dual objectives of effectively handling peak flows and maximizing sludge solids content are achievable in a simple-to-operate primary treatment system.
When first contemplated, it seems elementary that a primary treatment system that settles and removes solids only once would be advantageous to a system that settles and removes solids twice. In the latter system, the underflow from the first phase of settling becomes the influent to the second phase. It is obvious that there are additional chances to lose solids to the effluent in the latter...
Author(s)
Richard C. Claus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 24 Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Physical/Chemical Treatment Processes
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:10L.295;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784678982
Volume / Issue2003 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)295 - 311
Copyright2003
Word count331

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289854
Get access
-289854
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER
Abstract
When first contemplated, it seems elementary that a primary treatment system that settles and removes solids only once would be advantageous to a system that settles and removes solids twice. In the latter system, the underflow from the first phase of settling becomes the influent to the second phase. It is obvious that there are additional chances to lose solids to the effluent in the latter system and effective removal efficiencies are the product of removal efficiencies in each removal step. Therefore, common sense may lead us to the premature conclusion that a primary system that must settle and remove solids twice would not be advantageous.However, the Town of Speedway, Indiana Wastewater Treatment Plant operates successfully in a mode that requires settling of solids twice to be effectively removed in primary treatment. The rectangular primary settling that receive process flow are operated in a “zero-blanket” mode. Sludge withdrawal from the five process tanks is continually sent to an off-line gravity thickener to be settled and removed a second time. While overall, average primary removal efficiencies remain comparable to that of conventional primary treatment, primary treatment performance is significantly enhanced under peak, wet-weather flow scenarios. This is due to the absence of a sludge blanket in the tank's receiving peak process flows that would otherwise be subject to effluent washout under peak flow conditions. Superior performance under peak conditions is now achievable without impacting primary sludge solids content. Elevated sludge blanket levels necessary for optimizing underflow solids content are maintained in the primary sludge gravity thickener. Sludge blanket management has historically been a “dual edged sword” where the ability to process peak flows without solids washout was only possible at the expense of underflow solids content. With process modifications to allow zero-blanket operation with a primary sludge gravity thickener, the dual objectives of effectively handling peak flows and maximizing sludge solids content are achievable in a simple-to-operate primary treatment system.
When first contemplated, it seems elementary that a primary treatment system that settles and removes solids only once would be advantageous to a system that settles and removes solids twice. In the latter system, the underflow from the first phase of settling becomes the influent to the second phase. It is obvious that there are additional chances to lose solids to the effluent in the latter...
Author(s)
Richard C. Claus
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 24 Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Physical/Chemical Treatment Processes
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:10L.295;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784678982
Volume / Issue2003 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)295 - 311
Copyright2003
Word count331

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Richard C. Claus. CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289854CITANCHOR>.
Richard C. Claus. CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289854CITANCHOR.
Richard C. Claus
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TANK TO A PRIMARY SLUDGE GRAVITY THICKENER
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289854CITANCHOR