lastID = -289863
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 17:01:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 17:01:58 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:37:29 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:37:28 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:37:27 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant

BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant

BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant
Abstract
An advanced wastewater treatment plant was commissioned in 1992 for the City of Kalispell, which is located in northwest Montana and discharging to a sensitive Rocky Mountain watershed. The plant featured a biological nutrient removal (BNR) process and primary sludge fermentation to ensure complete biological phosphorus (Bio-P) removal. This plant was state-of-the-art BNR at the time and has performed exceptionally well since its commissioning having been awarded many federal, state, and local awards for its excellent effluent quality. Recent rapid growth within the community however has caused plant loading to near original design loading limits and consequently initiated a review of the facility. Stantec, the original designers of the BNR processes, were retained once again to review the process with two objectives in mind: 1) to determine the reserve capacity of the existing BNR process (i.e. bioreactors, secondary clarifiers, and primary sludge fermenter), and 2) provide a longer-term expansion/upgrade plan for the facility in order to provide treatment through to the year 2025.BioWin™ modelling was conducted on the existing Modified University Capetown (UCT) BNR process in order to determine any reserve capacity. Observations regarding favourable nitrifier growth rate, high bioreactor hydraulic residence time, and good sludge settleability and control, were considered in the analysis, and suggest the existing facility may treat an additional 35% BOD load in comparison to the original design loading. With just a fine-bubble retrofit, modelling suggests the existing process can extend treatment through to 2006 – 2007 before expansion of some sort would be required.Beyond 2007 plant expansion is required. Stantec is recommending certain BNR upgrades be implemented in order to simplify the BNR process and reflect advances in the state of BNR technology from “then” to “now”. The primary changes recommended include converting the bioreactor configuration from a Modified UCT process to a Modified Johannesburg process, and converting from two-stage primary sludge fermentation to single-stage primary sludge fermentation.
An advanced wastewater treatment plant was commissioned in 1992 for the City of Kalispell, which is located in northwest Montana and discharging to a sensitive Rocky Mountain watershed. The plant featured a biological nutrient removal (BNR) process and primary sludge fermentation to ensure complete biological phosphorus (Bio-P) removal. This plant was state-of-the-art BNR at the time and has...
Author(s)
Olav NatvikBob DawsonJoni EmrickScott Murphy
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 25 Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Biological Nutrient Removal Applications and Optimization
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:10L.403;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784678946
Volume / Issue2003 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)403 - 411
Copyright2003
Word count326

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289863
Get access
-289863
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant
Abstract
An advanced wastewater treatment plant was commissioned in 1992 for the City of Kalispell, which is located in northwest Montana and discharging to a sensitive Rocky Mountain watershed. The plant featured a biological nutrient removal (BNR) process and primary sludge fermentation to ensure complete biological phosphorus (Bio-P) removal. This plant was state-of-the-art BNR at the time and has performed exceptionally well since its commissioning having been awarded many federal, state, and local awards for its excellent effluent quality. Recent rapid growth within the community however has caused plant loading to near original design loading limits and consequently initiated a review of the facility. Stantec, the original designers of the BNR processes, were retained once again to review the process with two objectives in mind: 1) to determine the reserve capacity of the existing BNR process (i.e. bioreactors, secondary clarifiers, and primary sludge fermenter), and 2) provide a longer-term expansion/upgrade plan for the facility in order to provide treatment through to the year 2025.BioWin™ modelling was conducted on the existing Modified University Capetown (UCT) BNR process in order to determine any reserve capacity. Observations regarding favourable nitrifier growth rate, high bioreactor hydraulic residence time, and good sludge settleability and control, were considered in the analysis, and suggest the existing facility may treat an additional 35% BOD load in comparison to the original design loading. With just a fine-bubble retrofit, modelling suggests the existing process can extend treatment through to 2006 – 2007 before expansion of some sort would be required.Beyond 2007 plant expansion is required. Stantec is recommending certain BNR upgrades be implemented in order to simplify the BNR process and reflect advances in the state of BNR technology from “then” to “now”. The primary changes recommended include converting the bioreactor configuration from a Modified UCT process to a Modified Johannesburg process, and converting from two-stage primary sludge fermentation to single-stage primary sludge fermentation.
An advanced wastewater treatment plant was commissioned in 1992 for the City of Kalispell, which is located in northwest Montana and discharging to a sensitive Rocky Mountain watershed. The plant featured a biological nutrient removal (BNR) process and primary sludge fermentation to ensure complete biological phosphorus (Bio-P) removal. This plant was state-of-the-art BNR at the time and has...
Author(s)
Olav NatvikBob DawsonJoni EmrickScott Murphy
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 25 Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Biological Nutrient Removal Applications and Optimization
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:10L.403;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784678946
Volume / Issue2003 / 10
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)403 - 411
Copyright2003
Word count326

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Olav Natvik# Bob Dawson# Joni Emrick# Scott Murphy. BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289863CITANCHOR>.
Olav Natvik# Bob Dawson# Joni Emrick# Scott Murphy. BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289863CITANCHOR.
Olav Natvik# Bob Dawson# Joni Emrick# Scott Murphy
BNR “Then” vs “Now” A Case Study - Kalispell Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289863CITANCHOR