lastID = -289970
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 23:01:53 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 23:01:52 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure

Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure

Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure
Abstract
This paper explores factors leading to failure of an anaerobic selector compared to success at an adjacent wastewater treatment plant in the Seattle, Washington region. An anaerobic selector had been tested at bench and pilot scale at the West Point Treatment Plant in 1988. Settleability during selector operation proved worse than during periods of operation without the selector. In contrast, pilot-scale operation of an anaerobic selector at the South Treatment Plant in Renton was successful and full-scale operation of a selector has been able to control chronically poor settleability at this plant. Modeling of the two different plant configurations was conducted using the commercial BioWin™ model and a multi-species model developed by the senior author. The BioWin™ modeling confirmed the signs of enhanced biological phosphorus removal at the South Treatment Plant: disappearance of soluble phosphorus from the plant effluent, phosphate release in the anaerobic zone, and increase in the ratio of phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAO) relative to other heterotrophic organisms. These signs failed to appear in the modeling of the West Point plant. This suggests that biological phosphorus removal is key to improving settleability with an anaerobic selector at this plant. The multi-species model provided a qualitative explanation for the poor settleability experienced at West Point in non-selector operation. It was also used to check potential feasibility of an aerobic selector for West Point. It failed to predict, however, the experimentally determined result that settleability was worse during anaerobic selector operation than it had been before. It likewise failed to adequately simulate phosphorus uptake.
This paper explores factors leading to failure of an anaerobic selector compared to success at an adjacent wastewater treatment plant in the Seattle, Washington region. An anaerobic selector had been tested at bench and pilot scale at the West Point Treatment Plant in 1988. Settleability during selector operation proved worse than during periods of operation without the selector. In contrast,...
Author(s)
Randal W. SamstagRichard ButlerRick Hammond
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3 - Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Process Optimization and Biological Modeling
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:12L.246;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784755265
Volume / Issue2003 / 12
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)246 - 262
Copyright2003
Word count260

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-289970
Get access
-289970
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure
Abstract
This paper explores factors leading to failure of an anaerobic selector compared to success at an adjacent wastewater treatment plant in the Seattle, Washington region. An anaerobic selector had been tested at bench and pilot scale at the West Point Treatment Plant in 1988. Settleability during selector operation proved worse than during periods of operation without the selector. In contrast, pilot-scale operation of an anaerobic selector at the South Treatment Plant in Renton was successful and full-scale operation of a selector has been able to control chronically poor settleability at this plant. Modeling of the two different plant configurations was conducted using the commercial BioWin™ model and a multi-species model developed by the senior author. The BioWin™ modeling confirmed the signs of enhanced biological phosphorus removal at the South Treatment Plant: disappearance of soluble phosphorus from the plant effluent, phosphate release in the anaerobic zone, and increase in the ratio of phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAO) relative to other heterotrophic organisms. These signs failed to appear in the modeling of the West Point plant. This suggests that biological phosphorus removal is key to improving settleability with an anaerobic selector at this plant. The multi-species model provided a qualitative explanation for the poor settleability experienced at West Point in non-selector operation. It was also used to check potential feasibility of an aerobic selector for West Point. It failed to predict, however, the experimentally determined result that settleability was worse during anaerobic selector operation than it had been before. It likewise failed to adequately simulate phosphorus uptake.
This paper explores factors leading to failure of an anaerobic selector compared to success at an adjacent wastewater treatment plant in the Seattle, Washington region. An anaerobic selector had been tested at bench and pilot scale at the West Point Treatment Plant in 1988. Settleability during selector operation proved worse than during periods of operation without the selector. In contrast,...
Author(s)
Randal W. SamstagRichard ButlerRick Hammond
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3 - Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Process Optimization and Biological Modeling
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:12L.246;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784755265
Volume / Issue2003 / 12
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)246 - 262
Copyright2003
Word count260

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Randal W. Samstag# Richard Butler# Rick Hammond. Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 16 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-289970CITANCHOR>.
Randal W. Samstag# Richard Butler# Rick Hammond. Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289970CITANCHOR.
Randal W. Samstag# Richard Butler# Rick Hammond
Factors Influencing Selector Success And Failure
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 16, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-289970CITANCHOR