lastID = -290061
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:13:38 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:52:55 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 00:52:27 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 00:52:26 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills

Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills

Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills
Abstract
The new arsenic in drinking water regulation will require many utilities to implement technologies for arsenic removal. Of the EPA identified treatment options, adsorption onto solid media seems to be the most attractive for small treatment facilities, especially in the arid Southwest. The arsenic bearing solid residuals from these adsorption processes are to be disposed in non-hazardous landfills. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test defines whether a waste is hazardous or non-hazardous (with respect to landfill disposal) and most solid residuals pass the TCLP. However, the TCLP may not correctly estimate the leaching potential of arsenic residuals. The TCLP poorly simulates the alkaline pH, anaerobic microbial activity, mineralogical aging, high phosphate, and concentrated organic characteristics of landfills. These same conditions are expected to favor mobilization of arsenic from metal oxide adsorbents. This study quantifies leaching of arsenic from solid residuals under landfill conditions. Activated Alumina (AA) and Granular Ferric Hydroxide (GFH) have been identified as the adsorbents that will be most widely used for arsenic removal. Consequently, this research focused on leaching from these two residuals. It examines the effect of pH and arsenic loading and the impact of anaerobic microbial activity on the mobilization and biotransformation of arsenate. In addition, alternative leaching tests, including two specifically developed to better simulate landfill conditions, are utilized and the leaching observed is compared to that from the TCLP. Small volume batch experiments indicated arsenic partitions significantly more strongly to the aqueous phase in the pH range of landfill conditions than that of the TCLP. Results from batch assays showed that soluble As(V) was readily reduced to trivalent arsenite (As(III)) by an unadapted methanogenic consortium when a mixture of volatile fatty acids was used as electron donating substrate. Dissimilatory reduction of As(V) sorbed onto AA was also observed in continuous column experiments. Microbial activity increased As mobility, and the total arsenic concentration in the reactor effluent ranged from 130-365 μg/L. On the average, 63% of the total As mobilized consisted of As(III). The work indicates that significantly greater arsenic leachate concentrations can be expected than predicted by the TCLP for both activated alumina and GFH. It further indicates that actual landfill leachate provides a significantly more aggressive leaching condition than either the TCLP or Waste Extraction Test (WET).
The new arsenic in drinking water regulation will require many utilities to implement technologies for arsenic removal. Of the EPA identified treatment options, adsorption onto solid media seems to be the most attractive for small treatment facilities, especially in the arid Southwest. The arsenic bearing solid residuals from these adsorption processes are to be disposed in non-hazardous...
Author(s)
W. ElaR. Sierra-AlvarezJ.A. FieldA. GhoshI. CortinasC. de las Casas
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3 Arsenic Residuals Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.198;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292115
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)198 - 212
Copyright2003
Word count385

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290061
Get access
-290061
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills
Abstract
The new arsenic in drinking water regulation will require many utilities to implement technologies for arsenic removal. Of the EPA identified treatment options, adsorption onto solid media seems to be the most attractive for small treatment facilities, especially in the arid Southwest. The arsenic bearing solid residuals from these adsorption processes are to be disposed in non-hazardous landfills. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test defines whether a waste is hazardous or non-hazardous (with respect to landfill disposal) and most solid residuals pass the TCLP. However, the TCLP may not correctly estimate the leaching potential of arsenic residuals. The TCLP poorly simulates the alkaline pH, anaerobic microbial activity, mineralogical aging, high phosphate, and concentrated organic characteristics of landfills. These same conditions are expected to favor mobilization of arsenic from metal oxide adsorbents. This study quantifies leaching of arsenic from solid residuals under landfill conditions. Activated Alumina (AA) and Granular Ferric Hydroxide (GFH) have been identified as the adsorbents that will be most widely used for arsenic removal. Consequently, this research focused on leaching from these two residuals. It examines the effect of pH and arsenic loading and the impact of anaerobic microbial activity on the mobilization and biotransformation of arsenate. In addition, alternative leaching tests, including two specifically developed to better simulate landfill conditions, are utilized and the leaching observed is compared to that from the TCLP. Small volume batch experiments indicated arsenic partitions significantly more strongly to the aqueous phase in the pH range of landfill conditions than that of the TCLP. Results from batch assays showed that soluble As(V) was readily reduced to trivalent arsenite (As(III)) by an unadapted methanogenic consortium when a mixture of volatile fatty acids was used as electron donating substrate. Dissimilatory reduction of As(V) sorbed onto AA was also observed in continuous column experiments. Microbial activity increased As mobility, and the total arsenic concentration in the reactor effluent ranged from 130-365 μg/L. On the average, 63% of the total As mobilized consisted of As(III). The work indicates that significantly greater arsenic leachate concentrations can be expected than predicted by the TCLP for both activated alumina and GFH. It further indicates that actual landfill leachate provides a significantly more aggressive leaching condition than either the TCLP or Waste Extraction Test (WET).
The new arsenic in drinking water regulation will require many utilities to implement technologies for arsenic removal. Of the EPA identified treatment options, adsorption onto solid media seems to be the most attractive for small treatment facilities, especially in the arid Southwest. The arsenic bearing solid residuals from these adsorption processes are to be disposed in non-hazardous...
Author(s)
W. ElaR. Sierra-AlvarezJ.A. FieldA. GhoshI. CortinasC. de las Casas
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3 Arsenic Residuals Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.198;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292115
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)198 - 212
Copyright2003
Word count385

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
W. Ela# R. Sierra-Alvarez# J.A. Field# A. Ghosh# I. Cortinas# C. de las Casas. Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 8 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290061CITANCHOR>.
W. Ela# R. Sierra-Alvarez# J.A. Field# A. Ghosh# I. Cortinas# C. de las Casas. Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 8, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290061CITANCHOR.
W. Ela# R. Sierra-Alvarez# J.A. Field# A. Ghosh# I. Cortinas# C. de las Casas
Laboratory Tests on the Fate of Arsenic in Landfills
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 8, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290061CITANCHOR