lastID = -290111
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 15:00:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:51:49 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:51:48 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:16:29 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:16:28 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT

EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT

EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT
Abstract
Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of crop requirements have led to a build-up of soil P levels which are of environmental, rather than agronomic concern, particularly in areas of intensive crop and livestock production. Six sites with soils having very high soil test P (STP) levels were established in 1998-2000 for field evaluation of utilizing alum water treatment residuals (WTR) to reduce high STP levels. In Michigan, the Bray-Kurtz P1 (Bray P1) extractant is used as part of the soil fertility test to determine plant-available P levels. When Bray P1 soil test levels reach 75-100 lb P/acre, the P2O5 fertilizer recommendations will usually be zero for most crops and yield levels grown in Michigan. When Bray P1 levels exceed 300 lb P/acre, manure management practices in Michigan recommend not applying any additional manure and/or fertilizer P. Two sites were established each year for amendment with alum WTR in the 1998, 1999 and 2000 growing seasons. The six sites had Bray P1 test levels of about 600, 1150, 1100, 1100, 620 and 360 lb P/acre. Alum WTR were applied to the 1998 sites at rates of 17 and 51 dry ton/acre and to the 1999 sites at rates of 20 and 60 dry ton/acre. In 2000, a different source of alum WTR was used at rates of 33 and 99 dry ton/acre. Soils were disked twice at each site following application to mix the WTR with soil. Subsequent tillage for additional mixing and seedbed preparation prior to planting varied from site to site. All six sites were rototilled in April/May, 2000 prior to planting to get a more thorough mixing of WTR and soil. Field corn (Zea mays L.) was planted at each site for most years, except soybeans (Glycine max L.) were planted at one site in 2000 and at one site in 2001. Diagnostic leaf tissue samples and yield measurements of corn and soybeans were taken during each growing season. Soils were periodically sampled to evaluate changes in Bray P1 STP levels with time. Bray P1 soil test levels declined at the two sites established in 1998, but alum WTR amendments did not contribute to this decrease. At the other four sites, some decline in Bray P1 soil test levels was observed, and alum WTR amendments significantly decreased STP levels compared to control soils. Results thus far suggest that the decrease in Bray P1 soil test that was expected from WTR amendments may be delayed due to inadequate mixing of alum WTR with the soil.
Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of crop requirements have led to a build-up of soil P levels which are of environmental, rather than agronomic concern, particularly in areas of intensive crop and livestock production. Six sites with soils having very high soil test P (STP) levels were...
Author(s)
Lee W. Jacobs
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12 Phosphorus Management Using Water Treatment Residuals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.778;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292764
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)778 - 792
Copyright2003
Word count451

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290111
Get access
-290111
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT
Abstract
Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of crop requirements have led to a build-up of soil P levels which are of environmental, rather than agronomic concern, particularly in areas of intensive crop and livestock production. Six sites with soils having very high soil test P (STP) levels were established in 1998-2000 for field evaluation of utilizing alum water treatment residuals (WTR) to reduce high STP levels. In Michigan, the Bray-Kurtz P1 (Bray P1) extractant is used as part of the soil fertility test to determine plant-available P levels. When Bray P1 soil test levels reach 75-100 lb P/acre, the P2O5 fertilizer recommendations will usually be zero for most crops and yield levels grown in Michigan. When Bray P1 levels exceed 300 lb P/acre, manure management practices in Michigan recommend not applying any additional manure and/or fertilizer P. Two sites were established each year for amendment with alum WTR in the 1998, 1999 and 2000 growing seasons. The six sites had Bray P1 test levels of about 600, 1150, 1100, 1100, 620 and 360 lb P/acre. Alum WTR were applied to the 1998 sites at rates of 17 and 51 dry ton/acre and to the 1999 sites at rates of 20 and 60 dry ton/acre. In 2000, a different source of alum WTR was used at rates of 33 and 99 dry ton/acre. Soils were disked twice at each site following application to mix the WTR with soil. Subsequent tillage for additional mixing and seedbed preparation prior to planting varied from site to site. All six sites were rototilled in April/May, 2000 prior to planting to get a more thorough mixing of WTR and soil. Field corn (Zea mays L.) was planted at each site for most years, except soybeans (Glycine max L.) were planted at one site in 2000 and at one site in 2001. Diagnostic leaf tissue samples and yield measurements of corn and soybeans were taken during each growing season. Soils were periodically sampled to evaluate changes in Bray P1 STP levels with time. Bray P1 soil test levels declined at the two sites established in 1998, but alum WTR amendments did not contribute to this decrease. At the other four sites, some decline in Bray P1 soil test levels was observed, and alum WTR amendments significantly decreased STP levels compared to control soils. Results thus far suggest that the decrease in Bray P1 soil test that was expected from WTR amendments may be delayed due to inadequate mixing of alum WTR with the soil.
Agricultural runoff and/or erosion can be a major contributor to nonpoint source pollution. Continued inputs of fertilizer and manure P in excess of crop requirements have led to a build-up of soil P levels which are of environmental, rather than agronomic concern, particularly in areas of intensive crop and livestock production. Six sites with soils having very high soil test P (STP) levels were...
Author(s)
Lee W. Jacobs
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12 Phosphorus Management Using Water Treatment Residuals
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.778;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292764
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)778 - 792
Copyright2003
Word count451

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Lee W. Jacobs. EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 24 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290111CITANCHOR>.
Lee W. Jacobs. EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 24, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290111CITANCHOR.
Lee W. Jacobs
EFFECT OF ALUM WTR AMENDMENTS TO PHOSPHORUS-ENRICHED SOILS ON SOIL TEST PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 24, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290111CITANCHOR