lastID = -290123
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 16:47:06 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 16:47:05 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:51:30 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:51:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 05:25:16 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 05:25:15 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE

THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE

THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
Abstract
Experience with thermal drying in Europe has been mixed. The last 20 years has seen the process growing in popularity but now there appears to be a decline in the drying plant market. Initially there was considerable debate about the relative benefits of drying untreated sludge v anaerobically digested sludge. Not having to provide digesters for, say a green field site, meant a potential reduction in capital expenditure and therefore was a very attractive option. However, concerns emerged about the ability to control the release of odours both during the process and after the product has been applied to land.It became apparent that the nature and composition of untreated sludge produced a dried product having different characteristics to those derived from treated sludge. In the first instance this was noticed in the granulation process and the final density of the product. Research into the fibre content of the sludge produced some interesting comparisons between the products and their relationship to the type of sludge processed. A worldwide survey of plants was undertaken to provide a limited database on which to base some conclusions. It became apparent that the fibre content of the sludge could be used to determine if a pelletiser should be included in the flow sheet.A number of safety issues have arisen and these are described. The role of the UK Government Health and Safety Executive in establishing a guidance document for the design and operation of sludge driers is described and some of their recommendation given.While the above refers to the production of a product with a dry solids content over 90%, systems are on the market that are more suitable to drying sludge to much lower ds content. These vary from the use of drying technology to reach the sludge autothermic limit prior to incineration to the latest developments, which involve the drying of the sludge to around 60%ds followed by lime treatment to create a product suitable for the recycling market.
Experience with thermal drying in Europe has been mixed. The last 20 years has seen the process growing in popularity but now there appears to be a decline in the drying plant market. Initially there was considerable debate about the relative benefits of drying untreated sludge v anaerobically digested sludge. Not having to provide digesters for, say a green field site, meant a potential reduction...
Author(s)
Paul Lowe
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 15 Thermal Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.943;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292584
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)943 - 960
Copyright2003
Word count336

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290123
Get access
-290123
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
Abstract
Experience with thermal drying in Europe has been mixed. The last 20 years has seen the process growing in popularity but now there appears to be a decline in the drying plant market. Initially there was considerable debate about the relative benefits of drying untreated sludge v anaerobically digested sludge. Not having to provide digesters for, say a green field site, meant a potential reduction in capital expenditure and therefore was a very attractive option. However, concerns emerged about the ability to control the release of odours both during the process and after the product has been applied to land.It became apparent that the nature and composition of untreated sludge produced a dried product having different characteristics to those derived from treated sludge. In the first instance this was noticed in the granulation process and the final density of the product. Research into the fibre content of the sludge produced some interesting comparisons between the products and their relationship to the type of sludge processed. A worldwide survey of plants was undertaken to provide a limited database on which to base some conclusions. It became apparent that the fibre content of the sludge could be used to determine if a pelletiser should be included in the flow sheet.A number of safety issues have arisen and these are described. The role of the UK Government Health and Safety Executive in establishing a guidance document for the design and operation of sludge driers is described and some of their recommendation given.While the above refers to the production of a product with a dry solids content over 90%, systems are on the market that are more suitable to drying sludge to much lower ds content. These vary from the use of drying technology to reach the sludge autothermic limit prior to incineration to the latest developments, which involve the drying of the sludge to around 60%ds followed by lime treatment to create a product suitable for the recycling market.
Experience with thermal drying in Europe has been mixed. The last 20 years has seen the process growing in popularity but now there appears to be a decline in the drying plant market. Initially there was considerable debate about the relative benefits of drying untreated sludge v anaerobically digested sludge. Not having to provide digesters for, say a green field site, meant a potential reduction...
Author(s)
Paul Lowe
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 15 Thermal Technologies
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:1L.943;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784292584
Volume / Issue2003 / 1
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)943 - 960
Copyright2003
Word count336

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Paul Lowe. THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 1 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290123CITANCHOR>.
Paul Lowe. THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290123CITANCHOR.
Paul Lowe
THE PROS AND CONS OF THERMAL DRYING OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 1, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290123CITANCHOR