lastID = -290206
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:18:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:18:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 19:27:13 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 19:27:12 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS

ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS

ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS
Abstract
With greater emphasis on water conservation, more industries are discharging more concentrated wastewaters. This has caused organic concentrations of the wastewaters to increase. This paper will address activated sludge treatment of a high strength pharmaceutical wastewaters (up to 14,000 mg/L COD).Historically, activated sludge aeration basins have been sized based on BOD and COD removal requirements. However, for high strength and readily degradable wastewaters, BOD and COD removal kinetics do not define the required aeration basin volumes. Oxygen transfer limitations govern the size of the basins. Practical limitations for coarse bubble, fine bubble, surface and jet aeration systems will be compared in selecting aeration basin requirements. Furthermore, a comparison with a conventional oxygen dissolution system will be compared. The relative capital, operating and present worth costs will be included in this comparison for a pharmaceutical wastewater application.When aeration basins are sized on oxygen transfer requirements, the power levels in these basins typically exceed 300 hp/MG (0.059 kw/m3). At these elevated power levels, excessive floc shear and excessive mixed liquor temperatures for mesophilic operations are experienced. The excessive floc shear can promote improved sludge settleability (e.g. sludge volume index and zone settling velocity) and endogenous respiration due to improved dissolved oxygen penetration. However, carefully designed re-flocculation may be required prior to secondary clarification to avoid excessive effluent total suspended solids (TSS) due to dispersed floc. The careful integration of surface aeration or coolers in aeration system design can be used to control mixed liquor temperatures. Practical guidance regarding design measures to address floc shear and elevated temperature impacts is provided.
With greater emphasis on water conservation, more industries are discharging more concentrated wastewaters. This has caused organic concentrations of the wastewaters to increase. This paper will address activated sludge treatment of a high strength pharmaceutical wastewaters (up to 14,000 mg/L COD).Historically, activated sludge aeration basins have been sized based on BOD and COD removal...
Author(s)
T. Houston FlippinW. Wesley Eckenfelder
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 14 Biological Industrial Wastes Treatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:2L.816;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784343893
Volume / Issue2003 / 2
Content sourceWEF Event
First / last page(s)816 - 822
Copyright2003
Word count264

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290206
Get access
-290206
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS
Abstract
With greater emphasis on water conservation, more industries are discharging more concentrated wastewaters. This has caused organic concentrations of the wastewaters to increase. This paper will address activated sludge treatment of a high strength pharmaceutical wastewaters (up to 14,000 mg/L COD).Historically, activated sludge aeration basins have been sized based on BOD and COD removal requirements. However, for high strength and readily degradable wastewaters, BOD and COD removal kinetics do not define the required aeration basin volumes. Oxygen transfer limitations govern the size of the basins. Practical limitations for coarse bubble, fine bubble, surface and jet aeration systems will be compared in selecting aeration basin requirements. Furthermore, a comparison with a conventional oxygen dissolution system will be compared. The relative capital, operating and present worth costs will be included in this comparison for a pharmaceutical wastewater application.When aeration basins are sized on oxygen transfer requirements, the power levels in these basins typically exceed 300 hp/MG (0.059 kw/m3). At these elevated power levels, excessive floc shear and excessive mixed liquor temperatures for mesophilic operations are experienced. The excessive floc shear can promote improved sludge settleability (e.g. sludge volume index and zone settling velocity) and endogenous respiration due to improved dissolved oxygen penetration. However, carefully designed re-flocculation may be required prior to secondary clarification to avoid excessive effluent total suspended solids (TSS) due to dispersed floc. The careful integration of surface aeration or coolers in aeration system design can be used to control mixed liquor temperatures. Practical guidance regarding design measures to address floc shear and elevated temperature impacts is provided.
With greater emphasis on water conservation, more industries are discharging more concentrated wastewaters. This has caused organic concentrations of the wastewaters to increase. This paper will address activated sludge treatment of a high strength pharmaceutical wastewaters (up to 14,000 mg/L COD).Historically, activated sludge aeration basins have been sized based on BOD and COD removal...
Author(s)
T. Houston FlippinW. Wesley Eckenfelder
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 14 Biological Industrial Wastes Treatment
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2003
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20030101)2003:2L.816;1-
DOI10.2175/193864703784343893
Volume / Issue2003 / 2
Content sourceWEF Event
First / last page(s)816 - 822
Copyright2003
Word count264

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
T. Houston Flippin# W. Wesley Eckenfelder. ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290206CITANCHOR>.
T. Houston Flippin# W. Wesley Eckenfelder. ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290206CITANCHOR.
T. Houston Flippin# W. Wesley Eckenfelder
ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN SIZING AERATION BASINS
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290206CITANCHOR