lastID = -290951
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:26:15 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:52:26 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:52:25 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND

DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND

DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND
Abstract
The Chesapeake Bay Program has produced challenging new goals for reducing nitrogen and phosphorus loads to the Bay. By 2010, Maryland must reduce its annual nitrogen load to the Bay from 57 million pounds to 37 million pounds and its phosphorus load from 3.8 million pounds to 2.9 million pounds. The wastewater component of Maryland's proposed strategy to accomplish this is to upgrade all 67 major wastewater treatment plants in the state to the socalled “limits of technology” for nutrient removal, 3 mg/l for nitrogen and 0.3 mg/l for phosphorus, and assign load allocations to each WWTP based on these concentrations and permitted capacity. The current estimated capital cost to accomplish this is 800 million. The Maryland Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies (MAMWA) concluded that a nutrient trading program consisting of the creation of four trading associations could meet the goals of first achieving and then maintaining the point-source allocations at substantially lower cost than the original proposed strategy of upgrading all WWTPS by 2010 and recommended this approach to the state. The recommendation was then overtaken by the passage of a bill by the Maryland legislature authorizing a “Chesapeake Bay Users Fee” of thirty dollars a year to be charged to all water and wastewater utility customers in the state, with the revenue from the fee dedicated to the financing of wastewater treatment plant upgrades to the limit of technology for nutrient removal. Current Maryland policy seems to be to upgrade all major wastewater treatment plants in the state (0.5 MGD or larger) and provide 100 percent state grants for the cost. This approach would leave little room for nutrient trading and seems to ignore costeffectiveness consideration in the selection of nutrient reduction strategies.
The Chesapeake Bay Program has produced challenging new goals for reducing nitrogen and phosphorus loads to the Bay. By 2010, Maryland must reduce its annual nitrogen load to the Bay from 57 million pounds to 37 million pounds and its phosphorus load from 3.8 million pounds to 2.9 million pounds. The wastewater component of Maryland's proposed strategy to accomplish this is to upgrade all 67 major...
Author(s)
Cy Jones
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 28: Trading: TMDLs and Beyond
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:14L.620;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784137486
Volume / Issue2004 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)620 - 626
Copyright2004
Word count292

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-290951
Get access
-290951
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND
Abstract
The Chesapeake Bay Program has produced challenging new goals for reducing nitrogen and phosphorus loads to the Bay. By 2010, Maryland must reduce its annual nitrogen load to the Bay from 57 million pounds to 37 million pounds and its phosphorus load from 3.8 million pounds to 2.9 million pounds. The wastewater component of Maryland's proposed strategy to accomplish this is to upgrade all 67 major wastewater treatment plants in the state to the socalled “limits of technology” for nutrient removal, 3 mg/l for nitrogen and 0.3 mg/l for phosphorus, and assign load allocations to each WWTP based on these concentrations and permitted capacity. The current estimated capital cost to accomplish this is 800 million. The Maryland Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies (MAMWA) concluded that a nutrient trading program consisting of the creation of four trading associations could meet the goals of first achieving and then maintaining the point-source allocations at substantially lower cost than the original proposed strategy of upgrading all WWTPS by 2010 and recommended this approach to the state. The recommendation was then overtaken by the passage of a bill by the Maryland legislature authorizing a “Chesapeake Bay Users Fee” of thirty dollars a year to be charged to all water and wastewater utility customers in the state, with the revenue from the fee dedicated to the financing of wastewater treatment plant upgrades to the limit of technology for nutrient removal. Current Maryland policy seems to be to upgrade all major wastewater treatment plants in the state (0.5 MGD or larger) and provide 100 percent state grants for the cost. This approach would leave little room for nutrient trading and seems to ignore costeffectiveness consideration in the selection of nutrient reduction strategies.
The Chesapeake Bay Program has produced challenging new goals for reducing nitrogen and phosphorus loads to the Bay. By 2010, Maryland must reduce its annual nitrogen load to the Bay from 57 million pounds to 37 million pounds and its phosphorus load from 3.8 million pounds to 2.9 million pounds. The wastewater component of Maryland's proposed strategy to accomplish this is to upgrade all 67 major...
Author(s)
Cy Jones
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 28: Trading: TMDLs and Beyond
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2004
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20040101)2004:14L.620;1-
DOI10.2175/193864704784137486
Volume / Issue2004 / 14
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)620 - 626
Copyright2004
Word count292

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Cy Jones. DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-290951CITANCHOR>.
Cy Jones. DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290951CITANCHOR.
Cy Jones
DEVELOPING A NUTRIENT TRADING PROGRAM IN MARYLAND
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-290951CITANCHOR