lastID = -292164
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-06-14 20:00:00 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-06-14 19:59:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:50:36 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 22:50:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:37 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:09:36 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply

Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply

Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply
Abstract
This research was conducted to compare primary disinfection of total coliform with chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone for drinking water treatment and distribution systems. As part of that evaluation, kinetic models were evaluated that predict disinfection efficacy as a function of disinfectant type, contact time, pH, temperature and DOC. The water samples were taken from the outlet of settling basin in a conventional surface water treatment system that is provided with the raw water drawn from the mid-stream of the Han River or from tap water at Konkuk University.The inactivation curves obtained from a series of disinfection processes had a sharp loss of bacterial viability within 5 minutes followed by an extended phase with little loss. The order of reaction for disinfectant decay was 2.9 and 2.5 for chlorine and chlorine dioxide, respectively. The decay reaction rates during the second phase could be expressed by a first order reaction rate. Ozone decay reaction rates were described by a 2.2 reaction order.The experimental data obtained with chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone were fit using the Chick-Watson, Hom, and Selleck models. The Selleck model best fit the data for total coliform survival.The coliform inactivation rate could vary with many factors and should be dependent on the concentration of reaction compounds. The bactericidal effects of disinfectants were decreased as the pH increased in the range of pH 6-9. The influence of pH change on the killing effect of chlorine dioxide was not strong, but for ozone and free chlorine higher pH markedly reduced effectiveness.In order to observe the effect of suspended solids carry-over on chlorine consumption and disinfection efficiency, the water samples were filtered before inoculation using membranes of 2.5 μm or 11.0 μm pore size, or using a sand filter of 1.0 mm diameter media (uniformity coefficient of 1.4). In filtered water, chlorine disinfection effectiveness is enhanced compared with non-filtered water. Less chlorine was consumed in the filtered samples, indicating that the particulate phase had a significant chlorine demand. Consequently, disinfection was dependent on the effectiveness of filtration.Mixing intensity was influential in the effectiveness of disinfection. Total coliform inactivation by chlorine was increased as G value increased. G values above 500 sec-1 showed little difference in disinfection effectiveness.The predominant coliform bacteria in simulated distribution systems before chlorination were enterobacter agglomerans and klebsiella pneumonia. Klebsiella pneumonia has strong tolerance to the disinfectant, and was detected on carbon steel, galvanized steel and copper pipe after chlorination.
This research was conducted to compare primary disinfection of total coliform with chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone for drinking water treatment and distribution systems. As part of that evaluation, kinetic models were evaluated that predict disinfection efficacy as a function of disinfectant type, contact time, pH, temperature and DOC. The water samples were taken from the outlet of settling...
Author(s)
Yoonjin LeeSangho Nam
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7: Disinfection System Validation II
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:1L.556;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783978537
Volume / Issue2005 / 1
Content sourceDisinfection and Reuse Symposium
First / last page(s)556 - 581
Copyright2005
Word count412

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292164
Get access
-292164
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply
Abstract
This research was conducted to compare primary disinfection of total coliform with chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone for drinking water treatment and distribution systems. As part of that evaluation, kinetic models were evaluated that predict disinfection efficacy as a function of disinfectant type, contact time, pH, temperature and DOC. The water samples were taken from the outlet of settling basin in a conventional surface water treatment system that is provided with the raw water drawn from the mid-stream of the Han River or from tap water at Konkuk University.The inactivation curves obtained from a series of disinfection processes had a sharp loss of bacterial viability within 5 minutes followed by an extended phase with little loss. The order of reaction for disinfectant decay was 2.9 and 2.5 for chlorine and chlorine dioxide, respectively. The decay reaction rates during the second phase could be expressed by a first order reaction rate. Ozone decay reaction rates were described by a 2.2 reaction order.The experimental data obtained with chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone were fit using the Chick-Watson, Hom, and Selleck models. The Selleck model best fit the data for total coliform survival.The coliform inactivation rate could vary with many factors and should be dependent on the concentration of reaction compounds. The bactericidal effects of disinfectants were decreased as the pH increased in the range of pH 6-9. The influence of pH change on the killing effect of chlorine dioxide was not strong, but for ozone and free chlorine higher pH markedly reduced effectiveness.In order to observe the effect of suspended solids carry-over on chlorine consumption and disinfection efficiency, the water samples were filtered before inoculation using membranes of 2.5 μm or 11.0 μm pore size, or using a sand filter of 1.0 mm diameter media (uniformity coefficient of 1.4). In filtered water, chlorine disinfection effectiveness is enhanced compared with non-filtered water. Less chlorine was consumed in the filtered samples, indicating that the particulate phase had a significant chlorine demand. Consequently, disinfection was dependent on the effectiveness of filtration.Mixing intensity was influential in the effectiveness of disinfection. Total coliform inactivation by chlorine was increased as G value increased. G values above 500 sec-1 showed little difference in disinfection effectiveness.The predominant coliform bacteria in simulated distribution systems before chlorination were enterobacter agglomerans and klebsiella pneumonia. Klebsiella pneumonia has strong tolerance to the disinfectant, and was detected on carbon steel, galvanized steel and copper pipe after chlorination.
This research was conducted to compare primary disinfection of total coliform with chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ozone for drinking water treatment and distribution systems. As part of that evaluation, kinetic models were evaluated that predict disinfection efficacy as a function of disinfectant type, contact time, pH, temperature and DOC. The water samples were taken from the outlet of settling...
Author(s)
Yoonjin LeeSangho Nam
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 7: Disinfection System Validation II
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:1L.556;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783978537
Volume / Issue2005 / 1
Content sourceDisinfection and Reuse Symposium
First / last page(s)556 - 581
Copyright2005
Word count412

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Yoonjin Lee# Sangho Nam. Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 7 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292164CITANCHOR>.
Yoonjin Lee# Sangho Nam. Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 7, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292164CITANCHOR.
Yoonjin Lee# Sangho Nam
Comparative Study of Chemical Disinfection in Drinking Water Supply
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 7, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292164CITANCHOR