lastID = -292528
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Loading icon
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-03-27 01:31:27 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 01:31:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 22:39:18 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 22:39:17 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction

Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction

Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction
Abstract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A seven-month study was carried out to compare a novel approach for digestion of wastewater sludge, the Ennix process, with a conventionally operated (Control) aerobic digester on a side-by-side basis. The Ennix process does not require aeration of the digester and employs mixing on an intermittent basis. Selected bacteria and biochemicals are periodically added to waste activated sludge entering the digester to maintain a favorable environment for sludge biodegradation.Hydraulic and volatile solids loading patterns for the Ennix and Control digesters were almost identical throughout the study. The mean hydraulic residence times were 21 and 20 days, respectively, and the mean volatile solids loadings were 36 and 39 lb/1000 ft3/d, respectively. The mean solids residence time of the Ennix digester was 24.4 days, compared to 25.4 days for the Control.Oxidation-reduction potentials in the Ennix digester were significantly lower and more consistent than in the Control. However, the mean dissolved oxygen and hydrogen sulfide concentrations in the two digesters were statistically equivalent. The Ennix digester had significantly higher ammonia and alkalinity concentrations and significantly lower sulfate concentration and pH. The pH in the Ennix digester was lower than expected, given the high alkalinity. This possibly reflects accumulation of carbon dioxide from biochemical sludge stabilization.The Ennix digester achieved higher volatile solids destruction than the Control on eight of the ten sampling dates. Its mean volatile solids destruction was 20.4%, compared to 17.2% for the Control. Fecal coliform MPNs in the Ennix digester were consistently below the EPA 503 Class B criterion of 2 million per gram total solids. Its mean log removal of fecal coliforms was 1.11, compared to 1.08 for the Control. Contents of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, and Zn in Ennix digester sludge were similar to those of the waste activated and Control digester sludges and were well below EPA 503 Class B limits.Annual savings of $22,900 in electrical energy consumption at 6.5cents/kWH could be achieved using the Ennix process for both digesters at the 3 MGD facility where testing was conducted. Additional savings of $3,600 yearly would accrue through avoidance of electrical demand charges. Generally, a wastewater treatment plant employing 2% solids digestion would reduce electrical energy consumption by 3,100 kWH to 6,200 kWH annually per 1000 ft3 of digester volume with the Ennix digester optimization process.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A seven-month study was carried out to compare a novel approach for digestion of wastewater sludge, the Ennix process, with a conventionally operated (Control) aerobic digester on a side-by-side basis. The Ennix process does not require aeration of the digester and employs mixing on an intermittent basis. Selected bacteria and biochemicals are periodically added to waste...
Author(s)
Ben KoopmanWilliam T. EngelEdward M. Toby
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3: Energy Utilization and Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:5L.104;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783977501
Volume / Issue2005 / 5
Content sourceTechnology Conference
First / last page(s)104 - 133
Copyright2005
Word count394

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292528
Get access
-292528
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction
Abstract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A seven-month study was carried out to compare a novel approach for digestion of wastewater sludge, the Ennix process, with a conventionally operated (Control) aerobic digester on a side-by-side basis. The Ennix process does not require aeration of the digester and employs mixing on an intermittent basis. Selected bacteria and biochemicals are periodically added to waste activated sludge entering the digester to maintain a favorable environment for sludge biodegradation.Hydraulic and volatile solids loading patterns for the Ennix and Control digesters were almost identical throughout the study. The mean hydraulic residence times were 21 and 20 days, respectively, and the mean volatile solids loadings were 36 and 39 lb/1000 ft3/d, respectively. The mean solids residence time of the Ennix digester was 24.4 days, compared to 25.4 days for the Control.Oxidation-reduction potentials in the Ennix digester were significantly lower and more consistent than in the Control. However, the mean dissolved oxygen and hydrogen sulfide concentrations in the two digesters were statistically equivalent. The Ennix digester had significantly higher ammonia and alkalinity concentrations and significantly lower sulfate concentration and pH. The pH in the Ennix digester was lower than expected, given the high alkalinity. This possibly reflects accumulation of carbon dioxide from biochemical sludge stabilization.The Ennix digester achieved higher volatile solids destruction than the Control on eight of the ten sampling dates. Its mean volatile solids destruction was 20.4%, compared to 17.2% for the Control. Fecal coliform MPNs in the Ennix digester were consistently below the EPA 503 Class B criterion of 2 million per gram total solids. Its mean log removal of fecal coliforms was 1.11, compared to 1.08 for the Control. Contents of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, and Zn in Ennix digester sludge were similar to those of the waste activated and Control digester sludges and were well below EPA 503 Class B limits.Annual savings of $22,900 in electrical energy consumption at 6.5cents/kWH could be achieved using the Ennix process for both digesters at the 3 MGD facility where testing was conducted. Additional savings of $3,600 yearly would accrue through avoidance of electrical demand charges. Generally, a wastewater treatment plant employing 2% solids digestion would reduce electrical energy consumption by 3,100 kWH to 6,200 kWH annually per 1000 ft3 of digester volume with the Ennix digester optimization process.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A seven-month study was carried out to compare a novel approach for digestion of wastewater sludge, the Ennix process, with a conventionally operated (Control) aerobic digester on a side-by-side basis. The Ennix process does not require aeration of the digester and employs mixing on an intermittent basis. Selected bacteria and biochemicals are periodically added to waste...
Author(s)
Ben KoopmanWilliam T. EngelEdward M. Toby
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 3: Energy Utilization and Management
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:5L.104;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783977501
Volume / Issue2005 / 5
Content sourceTechnology Conference
First / last page(s)104 - 133
Copyright2005
Word count394

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2025 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Ben Koopman# William T. Engel# Edward M. Toby. Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 28 Oct. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292528CITANCHOR>.
Ben Koopman# William T. Engel# Edward M. Toby. Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed October 28, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292528CITANCHOR.
Ben Koopman# William T. Engel# Edward M. Toby
Ennix Digester Optimization Program for Energy Management and Biosolids Reduction
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
October 28, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292528CITANCHOR