lastID = -292608
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 13:06:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 13:06:28 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 02:45:42 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 02:45:41 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA

PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA

PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA
Abstract
EPA has begun to more closely regulate Class V stormwater injection wells under the UIC permitting program. In cases where karst groundwater eventually becomes a source of drinking water, EPA typically sets discharge limits at drinking water standards, posing a distinct challenge to property owners. The project involves a large transportation facility in the Southeast, which was informed by EPA that the state NPDES permit would be replaced by a federal Class V UIC permit. Over 8 acres of paved areas drain into two improved sinkholes near the facility. EPA elected to regulate several constituents in the injectate, to protect drinking water sources: benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylene, cadmium, copper, lead, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). Brown and Caldwell (BC) was retained to help the owner evaluate this challenge and develop a solution.EPA suggested that the owner/operator may want to consider stormwater management/treatment options that have been considered and/or implemented elsewhere, including grassed filter strips, or sand and organic filters (surface sand filter, underground sand filter, perimeter sand filter, organic media filter, and the multi-chamber treatment train). BC evaluated these types of options as well as others, such as infiltration basins, spray irrigation, constructed wetlands, and mechanical systems, to arrive at the site solution.The selected treatment system, which has been approved by EPA, designed, and is presently being constructed, includes the following principal components: (1) a new oil/water separator for the highest-strength stormwater; (2) a flow collection and diversion structure, followed by a first-flush retention basin; and (3) a constructed wetlands. The stormwater drainage system improvements were designed to accommodate peak flows from a 25-year, 24-hour storm. However, EPA determined that it would only be necessary to capture, treat, and monitor the “first-flush” stormwater from the site. By mutual agreement, the “first-flush” was designated as the first one-inch of runoff from the total impervious area. The sedimentation or retention basin is lined with compacted clay.The constructed wetlands is also a clay-lined basin, atop which is to be placed a 9-inch thickness of planting medium suitable for the plants specified. The wetlands is expected to remove 50 to 98 percent of the influent metals and 80 percent or more of the influent suspended matter. This will be a free surface water (FSW) wetland utilizing persistent emergent vegetation.The stormwater treatment cost equates to 23,000 per acre of impervious surface, which is comparable to or less than other passive systems achieving similar effluent quality, such as the multi-chamber treatment train.
EPA has begun to more closely regulate Class V stormwater injection wells under the UIC permitting program. In cases where karst groundwater eventually becomes a source of drinking water, EPA typically sets discharge limits at drinking water standards, posing a distinct challenge to property owners. The project involves a large transportation facility in the Southeast, which was informed by EPA...
Author(s)
Jeffrey L. PintenichJason W. Mullen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 98: Industrial Issues & Treatment Technology: Wastewater Management and Transport Facilities
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.8146;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813809
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)8146 - 8155
Copyright2005
Word count417

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292608
Get access
-292608
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA
Abstract
EPA has begun to more closely regulate Class V stormwater injection wells under the UIC permitting program. In cases where karst groundwater eventually becomes a source of drinking water, EPA typically sets discharge limits at drinking water standards, posing a distinct challenge to property owners. The project involves a large transportation facility in the Southeast, which was informed by EPA that the state NPDES permit would be replaced by a federal Class V UIC permit. Over 8 acres of paved areas drain into two improved sinkholes near the facility. EPA elected to regulate several constituents in the injectate, to protect drinking water sources: benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylene, cadmium, copper, lead, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). Brown and Caldwell (BC) was retained to help the owner evaluate this challenge and develop a solution.EPA suggested that the owner/operator may want to consider stormwater management/treatment options that have been considered and/or implemented elsewhere, including grassed filter strips, or sand and organic filters (surface sand filter, underground sand filter, perimeter sand filter, organic media filter, and the multi-chamber treatment train). BC evaluated these types of options as well as others, such as infiltration basins, spray irrigation, constructed wetlands, and mechanical systems, to arrive at the site solution.The selected treatment system, which has been approved by EPA, designed, and is presently being constructed, includes the following principal components: (1) a new oil/water separator for the highest-strength stormwater; (2) a flow collection and diversion structure, followed by a first-flush retention basin; and (3) a constructed wetlands. The stormwater drainage system improvements were designed to accommodate peak flows from a 25-year, 24-hour storm. However, EPA determined that it would only be necessary to capture, treat, and monitor the “first-flush” stormwater from the site. By mutual agreement, the “first-flush” was designated as the first one-inch of runoff from the total impervious area. The sedimentation or retention basin is lined with compacted clay.The constructed wetlands is also a clay-lined basin, atop which is to be placed a 9-inch thickness of planting medium suitable for the plants specified. The wetlands is expected to remove 50 to 98 percent of the influent metals and 80 percent or more of the influent suspended matter. This will be a free surface water (FSW) wetland utilizing persistent emergent vegetation.The stormwater treatment cost equates to 23,000 per acre of impervious surface, which is comparable to or less than other passive systems achieving similar effluent quality, such as the multi-chamber treatment train.
EPA has begun to more closely regulate Class V stormwater injection wells under the UIC permitting program. In cases where karst groundwater eventually becomes a source of drinking water, EPA typically sets discharge limits at drinking water standards, posing a distinct challenge to property owners. The project involves a large transportation facility in the Southeast, which was informed by EPA...
Author(s)
Jeffrey L. PintenichJason W. Mullen
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 98: Industrial Issues & Treatment Technology: Wastewater Management and Transport Facilities
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.8146;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813809
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)8146 - 8155
Copyright2005
Word count417

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Jeffrey L. Pintenich# Jason W. Mullen. PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292608CITANCHOR>.
Jeffrey L. Pintenich# Jason W. Mullen. PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292608CITANCHOR.
Jeffrey L. Pintenich# Jason W. Mullen
PASSIVE SYSTEM TREATS INDUSTRIAL STORMWATER FOR CLASS V INJECTION CRITERIA
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292608CITANCHOR