lastID = -292617
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:15:26 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:41:36 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:41:35 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED

MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED

MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED
Abstract
Starting in the mid-1980s, many wastewater utilities interested in composting sludge turned to in-vessel composting technologies. These technologies consisted of a number of enclosed vessels with highly mechanized systems for mixing and conveying of materials, and air handling and odor control. Compared to other traditional methods of composting, such as static pile and windrow, the in-vessel composting technologies were thought to provide several advantages. These perceived advantages were small area requirements, fewer personnel for operation and maintenance, more effective odor control, and more consistent product quality.Nevertheless, many in-vessel composting facilities encountered serious problems in dealing with odors, achieving moisture reduction, maintaining reliable mechanical operation, and producing a consistent quality compost product that was marketable. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) commissioned CDM to conduct an in-depth survey of six in-vessel composting technologies and the resulting report was published in 1989 (EPA, 1989).In the time since the report was published, more than 50 additional in-vessel composting facilities have been constructed and operated. However, of the most highly mechanized technologies, a large percent have either substantially reduced throughput compared to design capacity or curtailed operations. This report summarizes the results of a survey of 25 highly mechanized composting facilities conducted by CDM in 2005. Many facilities reported problems with inconsistent product quality, reduced throughput, odors, unreliable materials handling, and, most importantly for those facilities now closed, lower costs for competing methods of sludge or biosolids management.
Starting in the mid-1980s, many wastewater utilities interested in composting sludge turned to in-vessel composting technologies. These technologies consisted of a number of enclosed vessels with highly mechanized systems for mixing and conveying of materials, and air handling and odor control. Compared to other traditional methods of composting, such as static pile and windrow, the in-vessel...
Author(s)
John F. Donovan
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 100: Residuals & Biosolids Management: Management and Regulations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.8279;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813377
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)8279 - 8294
Copyright2005
Word count244

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292617
Get access
-292617
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED
Abstract
Starting in the mid-1980s, many wastewater utilities interested in composting sludge turned to in-vessel composting technologies. These technologies consisted of a number of enclosed vessels with highly mechanized systems for mixing and conveying of materials, and air handling and odor control. Compared to other traditional methods of composting, such as static pile and windrow, the in-vessel composting technologies were thought to provide several advantages. These perceived advantages were small area requirements, fewer personnel for operation and maintenance, more effective odor control, and more consistent product quality.Nevertheless, many in-vessel composting facilities encountered serious problems in dealing with odors, achieving moisture reduction, maintaining reliable mechanical operation, and producing a consistent quality compost product that was marketable. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) commissioned CDM to conduct an in-depth survey of six in-vessel composting technologies and the resulting report was published in 1989 (EPA, 1989).In the time since the report was published, more than 50 additional in-vessel composting facilities have been constructed and operated. However, of the most highly mechanized technologies, a large percent have either substantially reduced throughput compared to design capacity or curtailed operations. This report summarizes the results of a survey of 25 highly mechanized composting facilities conducted by CDM in 2005. Many facilities reported problems with inconsistent product quality, reduced throughput, odors, unreliable materials handling, and, most importantly for those facilities now closed, lower costs for competing methods of sludge or biosolids management.
Starting in the mid-1980s, many wastewater utilities interested in composting sludge turned to in-vessel composting technologies. These technologies consisted of a number of enclosed vessels with highly mechanized systems for mixing and conveying of materials, and air handling and odor control. Compared to other traditional methods of composting, such as static pile and windrow, the in-vessel...
Author(s)
John F. Donovan
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 100: Residuals & Biosolids Management: Management and Regulations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.8279;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813377
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)8279 - 8294
Copyright2005
Word count244

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
John F. Donovan. MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 2 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292617CITANCHOR>.
John F. Donovan. MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292617CITANCHOR.
John F. Donovan
MOST HIGHLY MECHANIZED IN-VESSEL COMPOSTING FACILITIES ARE HISTORY: LESSONS LEARNED
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 2, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292617CITANCHOR