lastID = -292623
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 12:43:35 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 12:43:34 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 04:38:19 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 04:38:18 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”

SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”

SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”
Abstract
Reducing sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) remains one of U.S. EPA's perennial top national priorities. Because EPA views all SSOs as unpermitted discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA), EPA has sought to address SSOs using enforcement rather than permitting tools. As part of EPA's national priority for SSOs, EPA Regional offices and their state partners have been asked to initiate enforcement actions or investigate SSO status against most major communities and regional systems. EPA Headquarters has set a goal of having all major systems with SSO problems under federal consent decree by 2007. Major systems are defined by EPA as those that serve a population of 300,000 or have 100 million gallons per day in permitted capacity.EPA has also established enforcement targets with States in work plans required in return for federal grants to the states to cover some of the States' costs of running the federal Clean Water Act permitting program. Many of these EPA-State agreements call for the states to address twenty percent of the communities with SSO problems each year.SSOs are not just a federal priority. Numerous high profile SSOs have led to beach closures, other local impacts and adverse publicity. The same is true for communities that experience chronic occurrences of water in basements. Collection system releases to streets, waterways, basements, and other areas have led numerous states to make SSO control a State priority as well.Over the past twenty years, most states have addressed SSO problems by imposing control requirements in NDPES permit or through State administrative orders – usually on consent. However, more recently, EPA is pushing hard to have all of the major SSO actions addressed via federal consent decree or litigation if the community will not consent to the entry of a decree.While State permits and consent orders are flexible and readily easily updated, federal consent decrees are typically inflexible and seek to impose comprehensive solutions with fixed deadlines to eliminate/minimize collection system releases.This paper summarizes the factors that NPDES enforcement agencies and private citizen groups often use in deciding which communities to seek enforcement against for SSOs. It goes on to outline the typical course of an SSO enforcement action, highlighting the key issues that most communities must face and overcome.
Reducing sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) remains one of U.S. EPA's perennial top national priorities. Because EPA views all SSOs as unpermitted discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA), EPA has sought to address SSOs using enforcement rather than permitting tools. As part of EPA's national priority for SSOs, EPA Regional offices and their state partners have been asked to initiate enforcement...
Author(s)
F. Paul Calamita
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 92: Public Education/Government Affairs/Environmental Management/Systems/Sustainable Water Resources: Washington, D.C. and Wet Weather Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.7601;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813764
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7601 - 7611
Copyright2005
Word count381

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292623
Get access
-292623
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”
Abstract
Reducing sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) remains one of U.S. EPA's perennial top national priorities. Because EPA views all SSOs as unpermitted discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA), EPA has sought to address SSOs using enforcement rather than permitting tools. As part of EPA's national priority for SSOs, EPA Regional offices and their state partners have been asked to initiate enforcement actions or investigate SSO status against most major communities and regional systems. EPA Headquarters has set a goal of having all major systems with SSO problems under federal consent decree by 2007. Major systems are defined by EPA as those that serve a population of 300,000 or have 100 million gallons per day in permitted capacity.EPA has also established enforcement targets with States in work plans required in return for federal grants to the states to cover some of the States' costs of running the federal Clean Water Act permitting program. Many of these EPA-State agreements call for the states to address twenty percent of the communities with SSO problems each year.SSOs are not just a federal priority. Numerous high profile SSOs have led to beach closures, other local impacts and adverse publicity. The same is true for communities that experience chronic occurrences of water in basements. Collection system releases to streets, waterways, basements, and other areas have led numerous states to make SSO control a State priority as well.Over the past twenty years, most states have addressed SSO problems by imposing control requirements in NDPES permit or through State administrative orders – usually on consent. However, more recently, EPA is pushing hard to have all of the major SSO actions addressed via federal consent decree or litigation if the community will not consent to the entry of a decree.While State permits and consent orders are flexible and readily easily updated, federal consent decrees are typically inflexible and seek to impose comprehensive solutions with fixed deadlines to eliminate/minimize collection system releases.This paper summarizes the factors that NPDES enforcement agencies and private citizen groups often use in deciding which communities to seek enforcement against for SSOs. It goes on to outline the typical course of an SSO enforcement action, highlighting the key issues that most communities must face and overcome.
Reducing sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) remains one of U.S. EPA's perennial top national priorities. Because EPA views all SSOs as unpermitted discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA), EPA has sought to address SSOs using enforcement rather than permitting tools. As part of EPA's national priority for SSOs, EPA Regional offices and their state partners have been asked to initiate enforcement...
Author(s)
F. Paul Calamita
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 92: Public Education/Government Affairs/Environmental Management/Systems/Sustainable Water Resources: Washington, D.C. and Wet Weather Issues
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:7L.7601;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783813764
Volume / Issue2005 / 7
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)7601 - 7611
Copyright2005
Word count381

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
F. Paul Calamita. SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 22 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292623CITANCHOR>.
F. Paul Calamita. SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292623CITANCHOR.
F. Paul Calamita
SURVIVING SSO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS “PAIN AND SUFFERING IS INEVITABLE-MISERY IS OPTIONAL”
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 22, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292623CITANCHOR