lastID = -292716
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 19:57:59 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 19:57:58 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 06:54:37 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 06:54:36 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES

WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES

WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES
Abstract
In this study, technical aspects of biogas pretreatment and energy conversion at wastewater treatment plants were examined. Data were compiled from survey results, literature data and industry professionals. The efficiencies of various gas pretreatment technologies and a gas treatment train schematic are presented. The energy conversion efficiencies, maximum contamination limits, and the minimum biogas required to use each energy conversion technology are also presented.The potential energy recovered is a function of the efficiencies of the energy conversion technology(s), natural gas supplementation (if applicable), biogas production rate and distribution of fuel (biogas and natural gas) to the energy conversion technologies, which may vary seasonally. Model plants were used to predict energy recovery potential with respect to plant energy consumption, for different plant sizes. Plant size was found to have little impact on energy consumption and biogas production on a flow basis. A medium sized (100,000 m3/day) model plant was selected for close examination of energy recovery potential. All cogeneration technologies were predicted to produce at least one-third of the plant electricity demands. Using gas engines for mechanical direct drive versus electricity production resulted in higher energy efficiency but there may be trade-offs of practicality. All technologies except steam turbines and molten carbonate fuel cells were predicted to produce enough heat for summer digester heating. Plants using cogeneration technologies likely require a boiler fueled with natural gas to supplement winter heating.
In this study, technical aspects of biogas pretreatment and energy conversion at wastewater treatment plants were examined. Data were compiled from survey results, literature data and industry professionals. The efficiencies of various gas pretreatment technologies and a gas treatment train schematic are presented. The energy conversion efficiencies, maximum contamination limits, and the minimum...
Author(s)
Vicky WongDavid M. BagleyHeather L. MacLeanHugh Monteith
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 79: Residuals & Biosolids Management: Biogas Utilization/Co-Digestion
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:9L.6480;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783815311
Volume / Issue2005 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)6480 - 6494
Copyright2005
Word count237

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292716
Get access
-292716
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES
Abstract
In this study, technical aspects of biogas pretreatment and energy conversion at wastewater treatment plants were examined. Data were compiled from survey results, literature data and industry professionals. The efficiencies of various gas pretreatment technologies and a gas treatment train schematic are presented. The energy conversion efficiencies, maximum contamination limits, and the minimum biogas required to use each energy conversion technology are also presented.The potential energy recovered is a function of the efficiencies of the energy conversion technology(s), natural gas supplementation (if applicable), biogas production rate and distribution of fuel (biogas and natural gas) to the energy conversion technologies, which may vary seasonally. Model plants were used to predict energy recovery potential with respect to plant energy consumption, for different plant sizes. Plant size was found to have little impact on energy consumption and biogas production on a flow basis. A medium sized (100,000 m3/day) model plant was selected for close examination of energy recovery potential. All cogeneration technologies were predicted to produce at least one-third of the plant electricity demands. Using gas engines for mechanical direct drive versus electricity production resulted in higher energy efficiency but there may be trade-offs of practicality. All technologies except steam turbines and molten carbonate fuel cells were predicted to produce enough heat for summer digester heating. Plants using cogeneration technologies likely require a boiler fueled with natural gas to supplement winter heating.
In this study, technical aspects of biogas pretreatment and energy conversion at wastewater treatment plants were examined. Data were compiled from survey results, literature data and industry professionals. The efficiencies of various gas pretreatment technologies and a gas treatment train schematic are presented. The energy conversion efficiencies, maximum contamination limits, and the minimum...
Author(s)
Vicky WongDavid M. BagleyHeather L. MacLeanHugh Monteith
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 79: Residuals & Biosolids Management: Biogas Utilization/Co-Digestion
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2005
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20050101)2005:9L.6480;1-
DOI10.2175/193864705783815311
Volume / Issue2005 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)6480 - 6494
Copyright2005
Word count237

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Vicky Wong# David M. Bagley# Heather L. MacLean# Hugh Monteith. WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 2 Jul. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292716CITANCHOR>.
Vicky Wong# David M. Bagley# Heather L. MacLean# Hugh Monteith. WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292716CITANCHOR.
Vicky Wong# David M. Bagley# Heather L. MacLean# Hugh Monteith
WERF: COMPARISON OF FULL-SCALE BIOGAS ENERGY RECOVERY ALTERNATIVES
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
July 2, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292716CITANCHOR