lastID = -292931
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-02-01 01:06:50 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:06:49 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)

Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)

Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)
Abstract
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) of Frederikshavn, Denmark, was extended in the early nineties to increase its average daily flow to 4,5 MGD (16,500 m3/d) and meet new requirements for nutrient removal (8 mg/l TN, 1,5 mg TP/l). A parallel biological aerated filter (BAF) was the selected as the most economical upgrade of the existing activated sludge plant (AS), and started up in 1995. Running two full scale processes in parallel on the same wastewater and treatment objectives for over ten years enabled a direct comparison in relation to operating performance, costs and experience.After screening, a combined grit and grease chamber and 3 primary settlers, the effluent is pumped to the bio-treatment, consisting of AS with recirculation (Modified Lutzack-Ettinger – MLE) and an upflow BAF with floating media. The wastewater is a mixture of industrial and domestic wastewater, with a dominant discharge of fish processing effluent which can amount to 50% of the flow. The maximum hydraulic load on the pretreatment section as a whole is 10 MGD (1,530 m3/h).Approx. 60% of the sewer system is combined with a total of 32 overflow structures. To avoid the direct discharge of combined sewer overflows into the receiving waters, the total hydraulic capacity of the plant is increased during rain to 27 mgd (4,330 m3/hour) or 6 times average flow. During rain, this is achieved by directing some of the raw sewage through a stormwater bypass to the BAF and switching all six BAF to full nitrification. After final biotreatment, the wastewater is conveyed through a 500 m sea outfall.The operation of the BAF can be modified to accommodate various treatment needs:either using simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in all filters with recirculationbottom aeration with full nitrification in all filters for stormwater treatmentor post-denitrification in 1 filter.On-line measurements for the parameters NO3, NO2, NH4 and PO4 as well as dissolved oxygen (DO) are used for control of aeration and for addition of flocculants for P-removal and external carbon source (methanol). The BAF backwash sludge, approx. 0.5 MGD (1.900 m3/d) once every 24 h in dry weather, is redirected to the AS plant. Sludge from primary settlers and the combined biosolids from the AS plant are anaerobically digested, with methane gas being used for generation of heat and power.This paper discusses the experience gained from the plant operation during the last ten years, compiling comparative performance and cost data of the two processes.
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) of Frederikshavn, Denmark, was extended in the early nineties to increase its average daily flow to 4,5 MGD (16,500 m3/d) and meet new requirements for nutrient removal (8 mg/l TN, 1,5 mg TP/l). A parallel biological aerated filter (BAF) was the selected as the most economical upgrade of the existing activated sludge plant (AS), and started up in 1995. Running...
Author(s)
Rene HansenTorben ThøgersenFrank Rogalla
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Hydrodynamic Cavitation Pilot Study for Controlling Cooling Water Quality
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:13L.162;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783710776
Volume / Issue2006 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)162 - 174
Copyright2006
Word count414

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-292931
Get access
-292931
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)
Abstract
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) of Frederikshavn, Denmark, was extended in the early nineties to increase its average daily flow to 4,5 MGD (16,500 m3/d) and meet new requirements for nutrient removal (8 mg/l TN, 1,5 mg TP/l). A parallel biological aerated filter (BAF) was the selected as the most economical upgrade of the existing activated sludge plant (AS), and started up in 1995. Running two full scale processes in parallel on the same wastewater and treatment objectives for over ten years enabled a direct comparison in relation to operating performance, costs and experience.After screening, a combined grit and grease chamber and 3 primary settlers, the effluent is pumped to the bio-treatment, consisting of AS with recirculation (Modified Lutzack-Ettinger – MLE) and an upflow BAF with floating media. The wastewater is a mixture of industrial and domestic wastewater, with a dominant discharge of fish processing effluent which can amount to 50% of the flow. The maximum hydraulic load on the pretreatment section as a whole is 10 MGD (1,530 m3/h).Approx. 60% of the sewer system is combined with a total of 32 overflow structures. To avoid the direct discharge of combined sewer overflows into the receiving waters, the total hydraulic capacity of the plant is increased during rain to 27 mgd (4,330 m3/hour) or 6 times average flow. During rain, this is achieved by directing some of the raw sewage through a stormwater bypass to the BAF and switching all six BAF to full nitrification. After final biotreatment, the wastewater is conveyed through a 500 m sea outfall.The operation of the BAF can be modified to accommodate various treatment needs:either using simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in all filters with recirculationbottom aeration with full nitrification in all filters for stormwater treatmentor post-denitrification in 1 filter.On-line measurements for the parameters NO3, NO2, NH4 and PO4 as well as dissolved oxygen (DO) are used for control of aeration and for addition of flocculants for P-removal and external carbon source (methanol). The BAF backwash sludge, approx. 0.5 MGD (1.900 m3/d) once every 24 h in dry weather, is redirected to the AS plant. Sludge from primary settlers and the combined biosolids from the AS plant are anaerobically digested, with methane gas being used for generation of heat and power.This paper discusses the experience gained from the plant operation during the last ten years, compiling comparative performance and cost data of the two processes.
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) of Frederikshavn, Denmark, was extended in the early nineties to increase its average daily flow to 4,5 MGD (16,500 m3/d) and meet new requirements for nutrient removal (8 mg/l TN, 1,5 mg TP/l). A parallel biological aerated filter (BAF) was the selected as the most economical upgrade of the existing activated sludge plant (AS), and started up in 1995. Running...
Author(s)
Rene HansenTorben ThøgersenFrank Rogalla
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 4: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes: Hydrodynamic Cavitation Pilot Study for Controlling Cooling Water Quality
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:13L.162;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783710776
Volume / Issue2006 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)162 - 174
Copyright2006
Word count414

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Rene Hansen# Torben Thøgersen# Frank Rogalla. Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF). Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 31 Aug. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-292931CITANCHOR>.
Rene Hansen# Torben Thøgersen# Frank Rogalla. Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF). Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed August 31, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292931CITANCHOR.
Rene Hansen# Torben Thøgersen# Frank Rogalla
Long Term Full Scale Comparison of Activated Sludge (AS) with Biological Aerated Filter (BAF)
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
August 31, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-292931CITANCHOR