lastID = -293486
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:39:54 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:39:53 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:44:30 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:44:29 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment

Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment

Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment
Abstract
The allowable nutrient discharge loading for a publicly owned industrial treatment works (POITW) with high industrial loading treating approximately 27 million gallons per day (mgd) is being capped based on the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries nutrient control regulations adopted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Based on an analysis of historical data, the facility has experienced an increase in effluent total nitrogen between 2000 and 2004 such that it cannot meet its proposed waste load allocation (WLA) at current flow conditions, without implementing source controls or in-plant nitrogen removal. Approximately one-half of this increase is the result of an increase in influent organic-N loading to the plant from both domestic and industrial sources. The other one-half is attributed to expected variability in the amount of TKN (organic-N and ammonia-N) that the treatment facility removed. To explain this variability and to identify plant practices or in-plant sources that may contribute to periodic lower nitrogen removal, the POITW initiated development of an optimization study for TKN removal. The objectives of the study were to determine fate of nitrogen species through the plant, and identify in-plant sources of nitrogen or possible operational practices that could be addressed to reduce effluent nitrogen. The study developed historical mass balances to track the fate of nitrogen within the plant by combining historical data with more detailed results from a short-term intense sampling effort. Tracking internal nitrogen sources, such as high-TKN solids recycle streams, provided a clearer picture of the uncontrollable variability in TKN removal that was observed in the plant's past performance. Understanding the causes of this variability will enable the facility to optimize TKN removal such that the plant removes the maximum amount of nitrogen possible for the system without nitrification, which may help the POITW to meet its proposed WLA at current flow conditions.
The allowable nutrient discharge loading for a publicly owned industrial treatment works (POITW) with high industrial loading treating approximately 27 million gallons per day (mgd) is being capped based on the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries nutrient control regulations adopted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Based on an analysis of historical data, the facility has...
Author(s)
K. LinaresM. HaleyJ. GrandstaffH. WalkerE. BaileyW. M'Coy
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 54: Facility Operations Including Lab Practices: BNR and Activated Sludge Plant Operations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:8L.4267;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783779221
Volume / Issue2006 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4267 - 4290
Copyright2006
Word count319

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-293486
Get access
-293486
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment
Abstract
The allowable nutrient discharge loading for a publicly owned industrial treatment works (POITW) with high industrial loading treating approximately 27 million gallons per day (mgd) is being capped based on the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries nutrient control regulations adopted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Based on an analysis of historical data, the facility has experienced an increase in effluent total nitrogen between 2000 and 2004 such that it cannot meet its proposed waste load allocation (WLA) at current flow conditions, without implementing source controls or in-plant nitrogen removal. Approximately one-half of this increase is the result of an increase in influent organic-N loading to the plant from both domestic and industrial sources. The other one-half is attributed to expected variability in the amount of TKN (organic-N and ammonia-N) that the treatment facility removed. To explain this variability and to identify plant practices or in-plant sources that may contribute to periodic lower nitrogen removal, the POITW initiated development of an optimization study for TKN removal. The objectives of the study were to determine fate of nitrogen species through the plant, and identify in-plant sources of nitrogen or possible operational practices that could be addressed to reduce effluent nitrogen. The study developed historical mass balances to track the fate of nitrogen within the plant by combining historical data with more detailed results from a short-term intense sampling effort. Tracking internal nitrogen sources, such as high-TKN solids recycle streams, provided a clearer picture of the uncontrollable variability in TKN removal that was observed in the plant's past performance. Understanding the causes of this variability will enable the facility to optimize TKN removal such that the plant removes the maximum amount of nitrogen possible for the system without nitrification, which may help the POITW to meet its proposed WLA at current flow conditions.
The allowable nutrient discharge loading for a publicly owned industrial treatment works (POITW) with high industrial loading treating approximately 27 million gallons per day (mgd) is being capped based on the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries nutrient control regulations adopted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Based on an analysis of historical data, the facility has...
Author(s)
K. LinaresM. HaleyJ. GrandstaffH. WalkerE. BaileyW. M'Coy
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 54: Facility Operations Including Lab Practices: BNR and Activated Sludge Plant Operations
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:8L.4267;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783779221
Volume / Issue2006 / 8
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)4267 - 4290
Copyright2006
Word count319

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
K. Linares# M. Haley# J. Grandstaff# H. Walker# E. Bailey# W. M'Coy. Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 5 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-293486CITANCHOR>.
K. Linares# M. Haley# J. Grandstaff# H. Walker# E. Bailey# W. M'Coy. Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 5, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293486CITANCHOR.
K. Linares# M. Haley# J. Grandstaff# H. Walker# E. Bailey# W. M'Coy
Can we Avoid Nitrification? Tracking the In-Plant Fate of Nitrogen at the Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 5, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293486CITANCHOR