lastID = -293586
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 18:32:44 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-02-01 01:02:50 Administrator
  • 2020-02-01 01:02:49 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process

Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process

Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process
Abstract
TMDL allocation is central to the overall TMDL process because it creates a technically feasible and reasonably fair division of the allowable load among sources. An innovative approach for TMDL allocation and implementation is the watershed-based pollutant trading. Given the inherent scientific uncertainty for the tradeoffs between point and nonpoint sources, setting of trading ratios can be a contentious issue and was already listed as an obstacle by several pollutant trading programs. One of the fundamental reasons that a trading ratio is often set higher (e.g. greater than 2) is to allow for uncertainty in the level of control needed to attain water quality standards, and to provide a buffer in case traded reductions are less effective than expected. Another reason is to account for differences in the impact of a pollutant in different locations. However, most of available studies did not provide an approach to explicitly address the determination of trading ratio. Instead, subjective selection based on project need and previous literature is often employed in selecting trading ratio within a pre-specified range. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis has rarely been linked to determination of trading ratio.This paper presents a practical methodology in estimating “equivalent trading ratio” and links uncertainty analysis with trading ratio determination from TMDL allocation process. Determination of ETR can provide a preliminary evaluation of “tradeoffs” between various combination of point and nonpoint source control strategies on ambient water quality improvement. Furthermore, there may be many combinations of point and nonpoint source load allocations that can meet the water quality standard. Greater portion of NPS load reduction in overall TMDL load reduction generally correlates with greater uncertainty and thus requires greater trading ratio. By further incorporating economic consideration (e.g. marginal cost for treatment), it will enhance the scientific basis and thus public perception with the determination of trading ratio for more informed decision in overall TMDL-based pollutant trading program.
TMDL allocation is central to the overall TMDL process because it creates a technically feasible and reasonably fair division of the allowable load among sources. An innovative approach for TMDL allocation and implementation is the watershed-based pollutant trading. Given the inherent scientific uncertainty for the tradeoffs between point and nonpoint sources, setting of trading ratios can be a...
Author(s)
Harry X. ZhangShaw L. Yu
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 50: Surface Water Quality and Ecology: Water Quality Modeling: Looking Outside of the Box
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:9L.3971;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783751528
Volume / Issue2006 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3971 - 3980
Copyright2006
Word count323

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-293586
Get access
-293586
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process
Abstract
TMDL allocation is central to the overall TMDL process because it creates a technically feasible and reasonably fair division of the allowable load among sources. An innovative approach for TMDL allocation and implementation is the watershed-based pollutant trading. Given the inherent scientific uncertainty for the tradeoffs between point and nonpoint sources, setting of trading ratios can be a contentious issue and was already listed as an obstacle by several pollutant trading programs. One of the fundamental reasons that a trading ratio is often set higher (e.g. greater than 2) is to allow for uncertainty in the level of control needed to attain water quality standards, and to provide a buffer in case traded reductions are less effective than expected. Another reason is to account for differences in the impact of a pollutant in different locations. However, most of available studies did not provide an approach to explicitly address the determination of trading ratio. Instead, subjective selection based on project need and previous literature is often employed in selecting trading ratio within a pre-specified range. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis has rarely been linked to determination of trading ratio.This paper presents a practical methodology in estimating “equivalent trading ratio” and links uncertainty analysis with trading ratio determination from TMDL allocation process. Determination of ETR can provide a preliminary evaluation of “tradeoffs” between various combination of point and nonpoint source control strategies on ambient water quality improvement. Furthermore, there may be many combinations of point and nonpoint source load allocations that can meet the water quality standard. Greater portion of NPS load reduction in overall TMDL load reduction generally correlates with greater uncertainty and thus requires greater trading ratio. By further incorporating economic consideration (e.g. marginal cost for treatment), it will enhance the scientific basis and thus public perception with the determination of trading ratio for more informed decision in overall TMDL-based pollutant trading program.
TMDL allocation is central to the overall TMDL process because it creates a technically feasible and reasonably fair division of the allowable load among sources. An innovative approach for TMDL allocation and implementation is the watershed-based pollutant trading. Given the inherent scientific uncertainty for the tradeoffs between point and nonpoint sources, setting of trading ratios can be a...
Author(s)
Harry X. ZhangShaw L. Yu
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 50: Surface Water Quality and Ecology: Water Quality Modeling: Looking Outside of the Box
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2006
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20060101)2006:9L.3971;1-
DOI10.2175/193864706783751528
Volume / Issue2006 / 9
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3971 - 3980
Copyright2006
Word count323

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Harry X. Zhang# Shaw L. Yu. Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 5 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-293586CITANCHOR>.
Harry X. Zhang# Shaw L. Yu. Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 5, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293586CITANCHOR.
Harry X. Zhang# Shaw L. Yu
Linking Uncertainty Analysis with Trading Ratio Determination from TMDL Allocation Process
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 5, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293586CITANCHOR