lastID = -293799
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2020-01-31 21:58:46 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 21:58:45 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples

Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples

Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples
Abstract
Ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 pure cultures, primary clarifier, secondary activated, secondary trickling filter effluent, and creek water samples successfully inhibited qPCR amplification of the uidA and fliC gene targets from injured or dead E. coli. In viable pure cultures, it was determined that 7.5 μg/ml of EMA reduced qPCR detection of the 18 hr and 40 hr cultures by approximately 1 log, but a continuous culture showed no difference between treated and untreated qPCR copy numbers at high cell concentration. Amplification of heat killed bacteria decreased from 3 to 6 logs depending on EMA concentration and culture age, while the greatest inhibition was observed in the 5 hr culture using 7.5 μg/ml EMA. Treatment exposure times had little effect on culturable numbers or qPCR copy numbers regardless of culture age and sample type. Media type (LB or mTEC) had no effect on the recovery of treated culturable cells from all culture ages and sample types examined, however all samples, both treated and untreated, were sensitive to incubation temperature (data not shown). In environmental water samples, EMA treatment had little to no effect on the recovery of bacteria on media, however qPCR results were lower in the EMA treated samples indicating a small population of non-viable bacteria that were being amplified in the untreated controls. Viability of E. coli in wastewater samples using qPCR was similar to pure culture results suggesting that the addition of EMA treatment to the pre-extraction procedure could easily be incorporated into qPCR assays for bacteria. The drawbacks of this compound are the high cost, the short shelf life and the impact of culture or cell density in environmental samples; however the benefits of rapid and accurate measurement of pathogenic bacteria as well as the potential to optimize biological treatment of wastewaters offset these disadvantages.
Ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 pure cultures, primary clarifier, secondary activated, secondary trickling filter effluent, and creek water samples successfully inhibited qPCR amplification of the uidA and fliC gene targets from injured or dead E. coli. In viable pure cultures, it was determined that 7.5 μg/ml of EMA reduced qPCR detection of the 18 hr...
Author(s)
Phillip B. GedalangaBetty H. Olson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 64: Practice-Based Application of Molecular Tools
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:13L.5064;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787969496
Volume / Issue2007 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)5064 - 5078
Copyright2007
Word count320

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-293799
Get access
-293799
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples
Abstract
Ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 pure cultures, primary clarifier, secondary activated, secondary trickling filter effluent, and creek water samples successfully inhibited qPCR amplification of the uidA and fliC gene targets from injured or dead E. coli. In viable pure cultures, it was determined that 7.5 μg/ml of EMA reduced qPCR detection of the 18 hr and 40 hr cultures by approximately 1 log, but a continuous culture showed no difference between treated and untreated qPCR copy numbers at high cell concentration. Amplification of heat killed bacteria decreased from 3 to 6 logs depending on EMA concentration and culture age, while the greatest inhibition was observed in the 5 hr culture using 7.5 μg/ml EMA. Treatment exposure times had little effect on culturable numbers or qPCR copy numbers regardless of culture age and sample type. Media type (LB or mTEC) had no effect on the recovery of treated culturable cells from all culture ages and sample types examined, however all samples, both treated and untreated, were sensitive to incubation temperature (data not shown). In environmental water samples, EMA treatment had little to no effect on the recovery of bacteria on media, however qPCR results were lower in the EMA treated samples indicating a small population of non-viable bacteria that were being amplified in the untreated controls. Viability of E. coli in wastewater samples using qPCR was similar to pure culture results suggesting that the addition of EMA treatment to the pre-extraction procedure could easily be incorporated into qPCR assays for bacteria. The drawbacks of this compound are the high cost, the short shelf life and the impact of culture or cell density in environmental samples; however the benefits of rapid and accurate measurement of pathogenic bacteria as well as the potential to optimize biological treatment of wastewaters offset these disadvantages.
Ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 pure cultures, primary clarifier, secondary activated, secondary trickling filter effluent, and creek water samples successfully inhibited qPCR amplification of the uidA and fliC gene targets from injured or dead E. coli. In viable pure cultures, it was determined that 7.5 μg/ml of EMA reduced qPCR detection of the 18 hr...
Author(s)
Phillip B. GedalangaBetty H. Olson
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 64: Practice-Based Application of Molecular Tools
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:13L.5064;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787969496
Volume / Issue2007 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)5064 - 5078
Copyright2007
Word count320

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Phillip B. Gedalanga# Betty H. Olson. Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Sep. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-293799CITANCHOR>.
Phillip B. Gedalanga# Betty H. Olson. Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed September 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293799CITANCHOR.
Phillip B. Gedalanga# Betty H. Olson
Development of a Quantitative PCR Method to Differentiate Between Viable and Non-Viable Bacteria in Environmental Water Samples
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
September 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-293799CITANCHOR