lastID = -294446
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 13:44:18 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 13:44:17 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:43:42 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-27 00:43:41 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 18:48:36 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:48:35 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY

A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY

A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY
Abstract
The following paper is a comparison of an organic media biofilter and a synthetic media biofilter for the treatment of residual odors emanating from the operation of a biosolids dewatering and truck loading system at the City of Toronto's Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant.The system compared was an in-ground, header/lateral system operated in a forced draft, up flow, open top configuration. The biofilter system consists of a 72,000 m3/hr four cell arrangement, consisting of a pre-humidification system, supplementary moisture addition through a surface irrigation system and variable frequency controlled ventilation fans. The odor control system was constructed with a chemical scrubber system using sodium hypochlorite and sodium hydroxide, followed by the biofilter. Odor testing revealed that the biofilter was sufficient to treat the odors without pre-treatment from the scrubber system. The scrubber system was removed from operation, and the biofilter maintained its exceptional performance. The scrubbers have yet to be re-commissioned.Biosolids dewatering facilities are typically characterized by persistent residual nuisance odors that are composed of organics and reduced sulphur compounds such as dimethyl sulphide (DMS), dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), and methyl mercaptan (MM). These compounds, with low water solubility and high molecular weights are difficult to degrade biologically to meet stringent Ministry of the Environment (MOE) odor emission guidelines.This paper describes the dewatering process, the generation and characterization of odors, and compares the odor removal characteristics of softwood bark organic media against a mineral based, permanent inorganic media. Practical operating experiences are discussed in detail and performance under a variety of conditions is examined using theoretical models. These kinetic models are used to describe the degradation characteristics of the process and can be used to predict the performance of the systems under a variety of operating conditions.
The following paper is a comparison of an organic media biofilter and a synthetic media biofilter for the treatment of residual odors emanating from the operation of a biosolids dewatering and truck loading system at the City of Toronto's Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant.The system compared was an in-ground, header/lateral system operated in a forced draft, up flow, open top configuration. The...
Author(s)
Daryl LettoDerek WebbMark RupkeBrian Herner
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12: Odor I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:3L.709;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787975615
Volume / Issue2007 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)709 - 725
Copyright2007
Word count308

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-294446
Get access
-294446
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY
Abstract
The following paper is a comparison of an organic media biofilter and a synthetic media biofilter for the treatment of residual odors emanating from the operation of a biosolids dewatering and truck loading system at the City of Toronto's Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant.The system compared was an in-ground, header/lateral system operated in a forced draft, up flow, open top configuration. The biofilter system consists of a 72,000 m3/hr four cell arrangement, consisting of a pre-humidification system, supplementary moisture addition through a surface irrigation system and variable frequency controlled ventilation fans. The odor control system was constructed with a chemical scrubber system using sodium hypochlorite and sodium hydroxide, followed by the biofilter. Odor testing revealed that the biofilter was sufficient to treat the odors without pre-treatment from the scrubber system. The scrubber system was removed from operation, and the biofilter maintained its exceptional performance. The scrubbers have yet to be re-commissioned.Biosolids dewatering facilities are typically characterized by persistent residual nuisance odors that are composed of organics and reduced sulphur compounds such as dimethyl sulphide (DMS), dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), and methyl mercaptan (MM). These compounds, with low water solubility and high molecular weights are difficult to degrade biologically to meet stringent Ministry of the Environment (MOE) odor emission guidelines.This paper describes the dewatering process, the generation and characterization of odors, and compares the odor removal characteristics of softwood bark organic media against a mineral based, permanent inorganic media. Practical operating experiences are discussed in detail and performance under a variety of conditions is examined using theoretical models. These kinetic models are used to describe the degradation characteristics of the process and can be used to predict the performance of the systems under a variety of operating conditions.
The following paper is a comparison of an organic media biofilter and a synthetic media biofilter for the treatment of residual odors emanating from the operation of a biosolids dewatering and truck loading system at the City of Toronto's Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant.The system compared was an in-ground, header/lateral system operated in a forced draft, up flow, open top configuration. The...
Author(s)
Daryl LettoDerek WebbMark RupkeBrian Herner
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 12: Odor I
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20070101)2007:3L.709;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787975615
Volume / Issue2007 / 3
Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids Conference
First / last page(s)709 - 725
Copyright2007
Word count308

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Daryl Letto# Derek Webb# Mark Rupke# Brian Herner. A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 6 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-294446CITANCHOR>.
Daryl Letto# Derek Webb# Mark Rupke# Brian Herner. A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294446CITANCHOR.
Daryl Letto# Derek Webb# Mark Rupke# Brian Herner
A COMPARISON OF AN ORGANIC BIOFILTER AND AN INORGANIC BIOFILTER FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL ODORS EMANATING FROM A BIOSOLIDS DE-WATERING FACILITY
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 6, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294446CITANCHOR