lastID = -294697
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-06 14:54:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-06 14:54:50 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-03-26 23:20:29 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 20:24:04 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 20:24:03 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs

Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs

Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs
Abstract
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are increasingly facing more restrictive effluent nutrient limits as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are being applied to receiving waters that are impaired due to the presence of excessive nutrients. This is causing an increasing number of POTWs to upgrade to provide total nitrogen control (denitrification and nitrification) and total phosphorus control. The cost of iron addition and subsequent excess sludge handling and disposal are causing more POTWs to upgrade to biological phosphorus removal. The readily biodegradable chemical oxygen demand (CODrb) naturally present in domestic sewage is inadequate for the denitrification and total phosphorus removal needs of these facilities. Historically, these facilities have added methanol as their additional source of CODrb. The cost of methanol had increased 380 percent through the 5 year period ending in January 2007. Additionally, the safety and security risks of handling methanol have posed concerns. These concerns have caused many of these facilities to turn to 56 percent by weight acetic acid as the current low cost source of CODrb. The cost of this material has increased by 35 percent during this same 5-year period. In either case, the cost of this type of supplemental CODrb is only expected to increase for POTWs making the operating costs of denitrification and biological phosphorus removal only increase with time while continuing to be influenced by market conditions. In addition, POTWs are facing rising energy costs (greater than 26 percent increase over the last 5 years). This has caused an increasing number of POTWs to implement energy recovery with anaerobic digestion facilities. This practice will only expand as energy costs continue to increase. Within 200 miles of nearly all POTWs, there are fluid milk plants that supply our nation's steady demand. These plants dispose of a small quantity of benign wastes generated from return products and off-spec products (approximately 0.5 percent of production). This concentrated waste has historically been transported at the industry's expense and utilized as animal feed or applied to agricultural lands. As more and more livestock operations consolidate and the distances to suitable agricultural lands increase, the disposal costs will continue to increase. These concentrated wastes offer a source of CODrb. There is a "win-win" solution for POTWs and the dairy industry with a combined savings projected at $15 million per year. One needs a low cost source of CODrb; the other provides this source and needs a low cost disposal option. This paper presents greater details of this synergy and concludes with case histories of those who have benefited from implementing this solution.
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are increasingly facing more restrictive effluent nutrient limits as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are being applied to receiving waters that are impaired due to the presence of excessive nutrients. This is causing an increasing number of POTWs to upgrade to provide total nitrogen control (denitrification and nitrification) and total phosphorus control....
Author(s)
Houston FlippinDennis Busch Dean
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectArticles
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20071001)2007:7L.431;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787781151
Volume / Issue2007 / 7
Content sourceIndustrial Wastes (IW) Conference
First / last page(s)431 - 442
Copyright2007
Word count432
Subject keywordsPUBLIC/PRIVATE COOPERATIONBENEFICIAL USECHEMICAL/ENERGY SAVINGS

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-294697
Get access
-294697
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs
Abstract
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are increasingly facing more restrictive effluent nutrient limits as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are being applied to receiving waters that are impaired due to the presence of excessive nutrients. This is causing an increasing number of POTWs to upgrade to provide total nitrogen control (denitrification and nitrification) and total phosphorus control. The cost of iron addition and subsequent excess sludge handling and disposal are causing more POTWs to upgrade to biological phosphorus removal. The readily biodegradable chemical oxygen demand (CODrb) naturally present in domestic sewage is inadequate for the denitrification and total phosphorus removal needs of these facilities. Historically, these facilities have added methanol as their additional source of CODrb. The cost of methanol had increased 380 percent through the 5 year period ending in January 2007. Additionally, the safety and security risks of handling methanol have posed concerns. These concerns have caused many of these facilities to turn to 56 percent by weight acetic acid as the current low cost source of CODrb. The cost of this material has increased by 35 percent during this same 5-year period. In either case, the cost of this type of supplemental CODrb is only expected to increase for POTWs making the operating costs of denitrification and biological phosphorus removal only increase with time while continuing to be influenced by market conditions. In addition, POTWs are facing rising energy costs (greater than 26 percent increase over the last 5 years). This has caused an increasing number of POTWs to implement energy recovery with anaerobic digestion facilities. This practice will only expand as energy costs continue to increase. Within 200 miles of nearly all POTWs, there are fluid milk plants that supply our nation's steady demand. These plants dispose of a small quantity of benign wastes generated from return products and off-spec products (approximately 0.5 percent of production). This concentrated waste has historically been transported at the industry's expense and utilized as animal feed or applied to agricultural lands. As more and more livestock operations consolidate and the distances to suitable agricultural lands increase, the disposal costs will continue to increase. These concentrated wastes offer a source of CODrb. There is a "win-win" solution for POTWs and the dairy industry with a combined savings projected at $15 million per year. One needs a low cost source of CODrb; the other provides this source and needs a low cost disposal option. This paper presents greater details of this synergy and concludes with case histories of those who have benefited from implementing this solution.
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are increasingly facing more restrictive effluent nutrient limits as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are being applied to receiving waters that are impaired due to the presence of excessive nutrients. This is causing an increasing number of POTWs to upgrade to provide total nitrogen control (denitrification and nitrification) and total phosphorus control....
Author(s)
Houston FlippinDennis Busch Dean
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectArticles
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Oct, 2007
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20071001)2007:7L.431;1-
DOI10.2175/193864707787781151
Volume / Issue2007 / 7
Content sourceIndustrial Wastes (IW) Conference
First / last page(s)431 - 442
Copyright2007
Word count432
Subject keywordsPUBLIC/PRIVATE COOPERATIONBENEFICIAL USECHEMICAL/ENERGY SAVINGS

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Houston Flippin# Dennis Busch Dean. Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs. Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 12 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-294697CITANCHOR>.
Houston Flippin# Dennis Busch Dean. Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs. Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 12, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294697CITANCHOR.
Houston Flippin# Dennis Busch Dean
Beneficial Use of Dairy Wastes in POTWs
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 12, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-294697CITANCHOR