lastID = -295025
Skip to main content Skip to top navigation Skip to site search
Top of page
  • My citations options
    Web Back (from Web)
    Chicago Back (from Chicago)
    MLA Back (from MLA)
Close action menu

You need to login to use this feature.

Please wait a moment…
Please wait while we update your results...
Please wait a moment...
Description: Access Water
Context Menu
Description: Book cover
A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method
  • Browse
  • Compilations
    • Compilations list
  • Subscriptions
Tools

Related contents

Loading related content

Workflow

No linked records yet

X
  • Current: 2022-05-04 18:33:52 Adam Phillips
  • 2022-05-04 18:33:51 Adam Phillips
  • 2020-01-31 18:51:24 Administrator
  • 2020-01-31 18:51:23 Administrator
Description: Access Water
  • Browse
  • Compilations
  • Subscriptions
Log in
0
Accessibility Options

Base text size -

This is a sample piece of body text
Larger
Smaller
  • Shopping basket (0)
  • Accessibility options
  • Return to previous
Description: Book cover
A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method

A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method

A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method

  • New
  • View
  • Details
  • Reader
  • Default
  • Share
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • New
  • View
  • Default view
  • Reader view
  • Data view
  • Details

This page cannot be printed from here

Please use the dedicated print option from the 'view' drop down menu located in the blue ribbon in the top, right section of the publication.

screenshot of print menu option

Description: Book cover
A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method
Abstract
The nitrifier maximum specific growth rate (mmax) is arguably the most important parameter for estimating reactor size in a biological nutrient removal (BNR) system. The authors used three methods to establish the design mmax value for the enhanced nutrient removal (ENR) upgrade at the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (LPWRP) in Howard County, Maryland. Statistical analysis of the high F/M data set indicated a high degree of correlation between seed size and the nitrifier maximum specific growth rate estimate. This is contrary to the premise under which the test was developed but is consistent with the author's observations for other studies conducted by several reputable laboratories on similar projects. This study concluded the low F/M method is superior to the high F/M test for the reasons cited.
The nitrifier maximum specific growth rate (mmax) is arguably the most important parameter for estimating reactor size in a biological nutrient removal (BNR) system. The authors used three methods to establish the design mmax value for the enhanced nutrient removal (ENR) upgrade at the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (LPWRP) in Howard County, Maryland. Statistical analysis of the high F/M...
Author(s)
Robert A. SimmB. ReedL. Hentz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 43: Nitrogen Removal
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:13L.3228;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788733279
Volume / Issue2008 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3228 - 3239
Copyright2008
Word count150

Purchase price $11.50

Get access
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: Book cover
A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method
Pricing
Non-member price: $11.50
Member price:
-295025
Get access
-295025
Log in Purchase content Purchase subscription
You may already have access to this content if you have previously purchased this content or have a subscription.
Need to create an account?

You can purchase access to this content but you might want to consider a subscription for a wide variety of items at a substantial discount!

Purchase access to 'A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method'

Add to cart
Purchase a subscription to gain access to 18,000+ Proceeding Papers, 25+ Fact Sheets, 20+ Technical Reports, 50+ magazine articles and select Technical Publications' chapters.

Details

Description: Book cover
A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method
Abstract
The nitrifier maximum specific growth rate (mmax) is arguably the most important parameter for estimating reactor size in a biological nutrient removal (BNR) system. The authors used three methods to establish the design mmax value for the enhanced nutrient removal (ENR) upgrade at the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (LPWRP) in Howard County, Maryland. Statistical analysis of the high F/M data set indicated a high degree of correlation between seed size and the nitrifier maximum specific growth rate estimate. This is contrary to the premise under which the test was developed but is consistent with the author's observations for other studies conducted by several reputable laboratories on similar projects. This study concluded the low F/M method is superior to the high F/M test for the reasons cited.
The nitrifier maximum specific growth rate (mmax) is arguably the most important parameter for estimating reactor size in a biological nutrient removal (BNR) system. The authors used three methods to establish the design mmax value for the enhanced nutrient removal (ENR) upgrade at the Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant (LPWRP) in Howard County, Maryland. Statistical analysis of the high F/M...
Author(s)
Robert A. SimmB. ReedL. Hentz
SourceProceedings of the Water Environment Federation
SubjectSession 43: Nitrogen Removal
Document typeConference Paper
PublisherWater Environment Federation
Print publication date Jan, 2008
ISSN1938-6478
SICI1938-6478(20080101)2008:13L.3228;1-
DOI10.2175/193864708788733279
Volume / Issue2008 / 13
Content sourceWEFTEC
First / last page(s)3228 - 3239
Copyright2008
Word count150

Actions, changes & tasks

Outstanding Actions

Add action for paragraph

Current Changes

Add signficant change

Current Tasks

Add risk task

Connect with us

Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Connect to us on LinkedIn
Subscribe on YouTube
Powered by Librios Ltd
Powered by Librios Ltd
Authors
Terms of Use
Policies
Help
Accessibility
Contact us
Copyright © 2024 by the Water Environment Federation
Loading items
There are no items to display at the moment.
Something went wrong trying to load these items.
Description: WWTF Digital Boot 180x150
WWTF Digital (180x150)
Created on Jul 02
Websitehttps:/­/­www.wef.org/­wwtf?utm_medium=WWTF&utm_source=AccessWater&utm_campaign=WWTF
180x150
Robert A. Simm# B. Reed# L. Hentz. A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Web. 29 Jun. 2025. <https://www.accesswater.org?id=-295025CITANCHOR>.
Robert A. Simm# B. Reed# L. Hentz. A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method. Alexandria, VA 22314-1994, USA: Water Environment Federation, 2018. Accessed June 29, 2025. https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295025CITANCHOR.
Robert A. Simm# B. Reed# L. Hentz
A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method
Access Water
Water Environment Federation
December 22, 2018
June 29, 2025
https://www.accesswater.org/?id=-295025CITANCHOR